Chin Samantha M, Jansen Silvia, Goode Bruce L
Department of Biology, Rosenstiel Basic Medical Science Research Center, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA 02454, USA.
Department of Biology, Rosenstiel Basic Medical Science Research Center, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA 02454, USA.
J Mol Biol. 2016 Apr 24;428(8):1604-16. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2016.03.006. Epub 2016 Mar 17.
Dynamic remodeling and turnover of cellular actin networks requires actin filament severing by actin-depolymerizing factor (ADF)/Cofilin proteins. Mammals express three different ADF/Cofilins (Cof1, Cof2, and ADF), and genetic studies suggest that in vivo they perform both overlapping and unique functions. To gain mechanistic insights into their different roles, we directly compared their G-actin and F-actin binding affinities, and quantified the actin filament severing activities of human Cof1, Cof2, and ADF using in vitro total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy. All three ADF/Cofilins had similar affinities for G-actin and F-actin. However, Cof2 and ADF severed filaments much more efficiently than Cof1 at both lower and higher concentrations and using either muscle or platelet actin. Furthermore, Cof2 and ADF were more effective than Cof1 in promoting "enhanced disassembly" when combined with actin disassembly co-factors Coronin-1B and actin-interacting protein 1 (AIP1), and these differences were observed on both preformed and actively growing filaments. To probe the mechanism underlying these differences, we used multi-wavelength total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy to directly observe Cy3-Cof1 and Cy3-Cof2 interacting with actin filaments in real time during severing. Cof1 and Cof2 each bound to filaments with similar kinetics, yet Cof2 induced severing much more rapidly than Cof1, decreasing the time interval between initial binding on a filament and severing at the same location. These differences in ADF/Cofilin activities and mechanisms may be used in cells to tune filament turnover rates, which can vary widely for different actin structures.
细胞肌动蛋白网络的动态重塑和周转需要肌动蛋白解聚因子(ADF)/丝切蛋白(Cofilin)家族蛋白切断肌动蛋白丝。哺乳动物表达三种不同的ADF/丝切蛋白(Cof1、Cof2和ADF),遗传学研究表明,它们在体内发挥重叠和独特的功能。为了深入了解它们不同的作用机制,我们直接比较了它们与G-肌动蛋白和F-肌动蛋白的结合亲和力,并使用体外全内反射荧光显微镜对人Cof1、Cof2和ADF的肌动蛋白丝切断活性进行了定量。所有三种ADF/丝切蛋白对G-肌动蛋白和F-肌动蛋白的亲和力相似。然而,在较低和较高浓度下,以及使用肌肉或血小板肌动蛋白时,Cof2和ADF切断肌动蛋白丝的效率都比Cof1高得多。此外,当与肌动蛋白解聚辅助因子冠状蛋白-1B和肌动蛋白相互作用蛋白1(AIP1)结合时,Cof2和ADF在促进“增强解聚”方面比Cof1更有效,并且在预形成的和正在生长的肌动蛋白丝上都观察到了这些差异。为了探究这些差异背后的机制,我们使用多波长全内反射荧光显微镜直接观察在切断过程中Cy3-Cof1和Cy3-Cof2与肌动蛋白丝实时相互作用的情况。Cof1和Cof2与肌动蛋白丝结合的动力学相似,但Cof2诱导切断的速度比Cof1快得多,缩短了在同一位置初始结合到肌动蛋白丝上与切断之间的时间间隔。ADF/丝切蛋白活性和机制的这些差异可能在细胞中用于调节肌动蛋白丝的周转速率,不同的肌动蛋白结构其周转速率差异很大。