• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

南部非洲的社区参与实践:对博茨瓦纳、津巴布韦和南非开展的研究的综述与主题综合分析

Community engagement practices in Southern Africa: Review and thematic synthesis of studies done in Botswana, Zimbabwe and South Africa.

作者信息

Musesengwa Rosemary, Chimbari Moses J

机构信息

College of Health Sciences, 1st Floor Desmond Clarence Building Howard College, University of KZN, Durban 4041, South Africa.

College of Health Sciences, 1st Floor Desmond Clarence Building Howard College, University of KZN, Durban 4041, South Africa.

出版信息

Acta Trop. 2017 Nov;175:20-30. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2016.03.021. Epub 2016 Mar 19.

DOI:10.1016/j.actatropica.2016.03.021
PMID:27005396
Abstract

Community Engagement (CE) is intended to enhance the participation of community stakeholders in research. CE is usually mentioned in publications as researchers discuss how they carried out community entry, consent and retained study participants but the actual CE activities are not always well documented. This paper reviews CE strategies employed in health research in Botswana, South Africa and Zimbabwe with reference to the development of a CE strategy for a multi-centre study to be conducted in these countries. The search was conducted using JANE (Journal/Author Name Estimator), Google Scholar and PubMed with known institutions and researchers providing context-specific material. The final synthesis includes 35 publications, 2 reports and 2 abstracts. There is evidence of CE being practiced in health research and eight closely related CE strategies were revealed. We conclude that since communities are heterogeneous and unique, CE activities will not have similar results in different settings. Even though there was insufficient evidence to determine which CE strategy is most effective, the review provides sufficient information to develop a CE strategy for a multi-centre study using the various strategies and activities described.

摘要

社区参与(CE)旨在提高社区利益相关者对研究的参与度。在研究人员讨论他们如何开展社区进入、同意和保留研究参与者的过程中,CE通常会在出版物中被提及,但实际的CE活动记录往往并不完善。本文回顾了博茨瓦纳、南非和津巴布韦在健康研究中采用的CE策略,并参考了一项将在这些国家开展的多中心研究的CE策略制定情况。搜索使用了JANE(期刊/作者名称估计器)、谷歌学术和PubMed,并结合已知机构和研究人员提供的特定背景材料。最终的综述包括35篇出版物、2份报告和2篇摘要。有证据表明CE在健康研究中得到了实践,并揭示了8种密切相关的CE策略。我们得出结论,由于社区是异质且独特的,CE活动在不同环境中不会产生相似的结果。尽管没有足够的证据来确定哪种CE策略最有效,但该综述提供了足够的信息,以便利用所描述的各种策略和活动为多中心研究制定CE策略。

相似文献

1
Community engagement practices in Southern Africa: Review and thematic synthesis of studies done in Botswana, Zimbabwe and South Africa.南部非洲的社区参与实践:对博茨瓦纳、津巴布韦和南非开展的研究的综述与主题综合分析
Acta Trop. 2017 Nov;175:20-30. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2016.03.021. Epub 2016 Mar 19.
2
Experiences of community members and researchers on community engagement in an Ecohealth project in South Africa and Zimbabwe.南非和津巴布韦社区成员及研究人员在一个生态健康项目中的社区参与经历。
BMC Med Ethics. 2017 Dec 13;18(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s12910-017-0236-3.
3
Community engagement strategies for genomic studies in Africa: a review of the literature.非洲基因组研究的社区参与策略:文献综述
BMC Med Ethics. 2015 Apr 12;16:24. doi: 10.1186/s12910-015-0014-z.
4
Rules of engagement: perspectives on stakeholder engagement for genomic biobanking research in South Africa.参与规则:南非基因组生物样本库研究中利益相关者参与的视角
BMC Med Ethics. 2018 Feb 27;19(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s12910-018-0252-y.
5
Initiating community engagement in an ecohealth research project in Southern Africa.在南部非洲的一个生态健康研究项目中启动社区参与。
Infect Dis Poverty. 2017 Mar 7;6(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s40249-016-0231-9.
6
Tygerberg Research Ubuntu-Inspired Community Engagement Model: Integrating Community Engagement into Genomic Biobanking.泰格堡研究受乌班图启发的社区参与模式:将社区参与融入基因组生物样本库
Biopreserv Biobank. 2019 Dec;17(6):613-624. doi: 10.1089/bio.2018.0136. Epub 2019 Nov 25.
7
2021 Community Engagement Studio Virtual Training Summit: Increasing the Diversity of Stakeholders Engaged in Research.2021 年社区参与工作室虚拟培训峰会:增加参与研究的利益相关者的多样性。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2024;18(2):277-285.
8
An unclosed loop: Perspectives of community engagement in infectious disease clinical trials in sub-Saharan Africa.未封闭的循环:撒哈拉以南非洲传染病临床试验中社区参与的观点。
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 2;19(8):e0308128. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308128. eCollection 2024.
9
What is community engagement and how can it drive malaria elimination? Case studies and stakeholder interviews.社区参与及其在疟疾消除中的作用:案例研究和利益相关者访谈
Malar J. 2019 Jul 17;18(1):245. doi: 10.1186/s12936-019-2878-8.
10
Managing community engagement in research in Uganda: insights from practices in HIV/AIDS research.管理乌干达的社区参与研究:来自艾滋病研究实践的见解。
BMC Med Ethics. 2022 Jun 14;23(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s12910-022-00797-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Toward an open access genomics database of South Africans: ethical considerations.迈向南非人开放获取基因组数据库:伦理考量
Front Genet. 2023 May 16;14:1166029. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2023.1166029. eCollection 2023.
2
What does equitable global health research and delivery look like? Tackling Infections to Benefit Africa (TIBA) partnership as a case study.公平的全球卫生研究和实施看起来是什么样的?以“抗击感染造福非洲”伙伴关系为例。
BMJ Glob Health. 2023 Mar;8(3). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-011028.
3
Community engagement in research in sub-Saharan Africa: current practices, barriers, facilitators, ethical considerations and the role of gender - a systematic review.
撒哈拉以南非洲的社区参与研究:当前的实践、障碍、促进因素、伦理考虑因素以及性别作用——系统评价。
Pan Afr Med J. 2022 Nov 23;43:152. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2022.43.152.36861. eCollection 2022.
4
Strengthening capacity for community and public engagement (CPE): a mixed-methods evaluation of the 'DELTAS Africa CPE seed fund' pilot.加强社区与公众参与能力(CPE):对“非洲DELTAS CPE种子基金”试点项目的混合方法评估
Wellcome Open Res. 2022 Mar 17;7:96. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.17665.1. eCollection 2022.
5
Community engagement in research in sub-Saharan Africa: approaches, barriers, facilitators, ethical considerations and the role of gender - a systematic review protocol.社区参与撒哈拉以南非洲地区研究:方法、障碍、促进因素、伦理考虑因素以及性别的作用——系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 May 11;12(5):e057922. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057922.
6
Challenges and solutions: surveying researchers on what type of community engagement and involvement activities are feasible in low and middle income countries during the COVID-19 pandemic.挑战与解决方案:调查研究人员在 COVID-19 大流行期间,低、中收入国家哪些类型的社区参与和活动是可行的。
BMJ Open. 2021 Oct 27;11(10):e052135. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052135.
7
Community-Based Health Planning and Services Plus programme in Ghana: A qualitative study with stakeholders in two Systems Learning Districts on improving the implementation of primary health care.加纳社区卫生规划和服务加强方案:在两个系统学习区与利益攸关方进行的一项定性研究,旨在改进初级卫生保健的实施。
PLoS One. 2020 Jan 8;15(1):e0226808. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226808. eCollection 2020.
8
Strengthening stakeholder engagement through ethics review in biomedical HIV prevention trials: opportunities and complexities.通过生物医学 HIV 预防试验中的伦理审查加强利益攸关方的参与:机会与复杂性。
J Int AIDS Soc. 2018 Oct;21 Suppl 7(Suppl Suppl 7):e25172. doi: 10.1002/jia2.25172.
9
Community involvement in biomedical research conducted in the global health context; what can be done to make it really matter?社区参与全球卫生背景下开展的生物医学研究;如何才能使其真正发挥作用?
BMC Med Ethics. 2018 Jun 15;19(Suppl 1):44. doi: 10.1186/s12910-018-0283-4.
10
Experiences of community members and researchers on community engagement in an Ecohealth project in South Africa and Zimbabwe.南非和津巴布韦社区成员及研究人员在一个生态健康项目中的社区参与经历。
BMC Med Ethics. 2017 Dec 13;18(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s12910-017-0236-3.