DeLiema Marguerite, Homeier Diana C, Anglin Deirdre, Li Danielle, Wilber Kathleen H
Stanford Center on Longevity, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.
Ann Emerg Med. 2016 Sep;68(3):371-7. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2016.02.008. Epub 2016 Mar 18.
We present 2 case studies of older patients who were brought to the emergency department (ED) in severely debilitated states. Both presented with severe malnutrition, contractures, and decubitus ulcers, and were nonverbal, with histories of dementia and end-stage disease. Their primary caregivers, adult children, were uncooperative with Adult Protective Services and disregarded treatment recommendations. Although both elders had signs suspicious for neglect, a comprehensive review revealed many layers of complexity. We use these cases to illustrate an approach to the assessment of possible elder neglect in ED settings and how to intervene to ensure patient safety. We begin with a discussion of the differences between willful, unintentional, and unsubstantiated neglect by a caregiver and then describe when to suspect neglect by evaluating the elder, interviewing the caregiver and first responders, assessing the caregiver's ability to meet the elder's needs, and, if possible, obtaining medical history and information about the home care environment. These cases illustrate the importance of careful documentation in cases of suspected neglect to assist investigative agencies, reduce the risk of further harm, and improve patient outcomes.
我们展示了2例老年患者的案例研究,这些患者被送往急诊科时处于极度虚弱的状态。两人均表现出严重营养不良、挛缩和褥疮,无法言语,有痴呆和终末期疾病史。他们的主要照料者,即成年子女,不配合成人保护服务机构,也无视治疗建议。尽管这两位老人都有被忽视的可疑迹象,但全面审查发现情况非常复杂。我们用这些案例来说明在急诊科环境中评估可能存在的老年人忽视情况的方法,以及如何进行干预以确保患者安全。我们首先讨论照料者故意、非故意和无事实依据的忽视之间的区别,然后描述何时通过评估老人、询问照料者和急救人员、评估照料者满足老人需求的能力,以及在可能的情况下获取病史和家庭护理环境信息来怀疑存在忽视情况。这些案例说明了在疑似忽视案件中仔细记录的重要性,以协助调查机构、降低进一步伤害的风险并改善患者结局。