Rueggeberg F A, Caughman W F, Gao F, Kovarik R E
Int J Prosthodont. 1989 Jul-Aug;2(4):371-5.
The tensile bond strengths of Comspan (a conventional resin used with composite-bonded prostheses) and Panavia EX (a newer adhesive bonding material) to different types of amalgam were determined. The results were compared with the tensile bond strengths of these resins to etched bovine enamel and properly prepared Rexillium III. The results showed that all of the resin-amalgam bond strengths were statistically less than those of bonding resin to etched bovine enamel or Rexillium III. Coverage of existing amalgam restorations by the metal framework with etched-metal resin-bonded retainers is contraindicated when using either the conventional bonding agent or the new adhesive bonding material, Panavia EX.
测定了Comspan（一种用于复合粘结修复体的传统树脂）和Panavia EX（一种新型粘结材料）与不同类型汞合金的拉伸粘结强度。将结果与这些树脂与酸蚀牛牙釉质及经过适当制备的Rexillium III的拉伸粘结强度进行了比较。结果表明，所有树脂与汞合金的粘结强度在统计学上均低于粘结树脂与酸蚀牛牙釉质或Rexillium III的粘结强度。当使用传统粘结剂或新型粘结材料Panavia EX时，禁忌使用带有酸蚀金属树脂粘结固位体的金属支架覆盖现有的汞合金修复体。
