• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于互联网的幸存者护理计划与电子病历之间电子接口的可行性研究。

Feasibility Study of an Electronic Interface Between Internet-Based Survivorship Care Plans and Electronic Medical Records.

作者信息

Hill-Kayser Christine E, Jacobs Linda A, Gabriel Peter, Palmer Steven C, Hampshire Margaret K, Vachani Carolyn, Edge Stephen B, Metz James M

机构信息

University of Pennsylvania Abramson Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and Baptist Memorial Cancer Center, Memphis, Tennessee

University of Pennsylvania Abramson Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and Baptist Memorial Cancer Center, Memphis, Tennessee.

出版信息

J Oncol Pract. 2016 Apr;12(4):e380-7. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2015.006841. Epub 2016 Mar 22.

DOI:10.1200/JOP.2015.006841
PMID:27006355
Abstract

PURPOSE

Survivorship care plans (SCPs) are recommended for all cancer survivors. Myriad barriers to implementation exist. This study was performed to evaluate the feasibility of interface development between an SCP and an electronic medical record (EMR).

METHODS

An information technology application was developed to extract data from the EMR in use at our center (Epic). Data were transferred to autopopulate an Internet-based tool for creation of SCPs (LIVESTRONG Care Plan) that had been previously used for the creation of more than 35,000 plans.

RESULTS

Data (demographic characteristics, surgeries, chemotherapy drugs, radiation site) were extracted from the EMR and transferred to the care plan platform, without transfer of protected health information. Care plans were created and transferred back to the EMR. During clinical testing, SCPs were created by nurse practitioners during scheduled clinic visits for 146 sequential, eligible patients (67% breast cancer, 33% colorectal cancer). All patients received completed care for a single cancer diagnosis at our institution. All data points that were automatically populated were reviewed by practitioners, and missing/blank data fields were populated manually when necessary. Data entered into generated care plans were accurate in 97% of audited cases, and the process of care plan generation could be completed in < 1 minute.

CONCLUSION

This is a feasible solution for the autopopulation of SCPs from the EMR. It represents a future methodology through which widespread implementation of SCPs may be undertaken. Future directions include further clinical testing, assessment of provider-perceived usefulness, and integration into routine clinical care.

摘要

目的

建议为所有癌症幸存者制定生存护理计划(SCP)。实施过程中存在诸多障碍。本研究旨在评估SCP与电子病历(EMR)之间接口开发的可行性。

方法

开发了一种信息技术应用程序,用于从我们中心使用的电子病历(Epic)中提取数据。数据被传输以自动填充一个基于互联网的SCP创建工具(LIVESTRONG护理计划),该工具此前已用于创建超过35000份计划。

结果

从电子病历中提取数据(人口统计学特征、手术、化疗药物、放疗部位)并传输到护理计划平台,同时不传输受保护的健康信息。创建护理计划并将其传输回电子病历。在临床测试期间,执业护士在预定的门诊就诊时为146例连续符合条件的患者(67%为乳腺癌,33%为结直肠癌)创建了SCP。所有患者均在我们机构接受了针对单一癌症诊断的完整护理。所有自动填充的数据点均由执业人员进行审核,必要时手动填充缺失/空白数据字段。在97%的审核病例中,输入生成的护理计划中的数据准确无误,护理计划生成过程可在不到1分钟内完成。

结论

这是一种从电子病历自动填充SCP的可行解决方案。它代表了一种未来的方法,通过该方法可以广泛实施SCP。未来的方向包括进一步临床测试、评估提供者感知的有用性以及整合到常规临床护理中。

相似文献

1
Feasibility Study of an Electronic Interface Between Internet-Based Survivorship Care Plans and Electronic Medical Records.基于互联网的幸存者护理计划与电子病历之间电子接口的可行性研究。
J Oncol Pract. 2016 Apr;12(4):e380-7. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2015.006841. Epub 2016 Mar 22.
2
Barriers and facilitators to implementing cancer survivorship care plans.实施癌症幸存者护理计划的障碍与促进因素。
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2013 Nov;40(6):575-80. doi: 10.1188/13.ONF.575-580.
3
Systematic approach to providing breast cancer survivors with survivorship care plans: a feasibility study.为乳腺癌幸存者提供生存护理计划的系统方法:一项可行性研究。
J Oncol Pract. 2015 Mar;11(2):e170-6. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2015.005173.
4
Impact of internet-based cancer survivorship care plans on health care and lifestyle behaviors.基于互联网的癌症生存者照护计划对医疗保健和生活方式行为的影响。
Cancer. 2013 Nov 1;119(21):3854-60. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28286. Epub 2013 Aug 6.
5
Use of Survivorship Care Plans and Analysis of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Multinational Patients With Lung Cancer.多国肺癌患者生存护理计划的使用及患者报告结局分析
J Oncol Pract. 2016 May;12(5):e527-35. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2015.008904. Epub 2016 Apr 5.
6
Development and evaluation of a bladder Cancer specific survivorship care plan by patients and clinical care providers: a multi-methods approach.患者和临床护理提供者共同制定和评估膀胱癌特定生存护理计划:一种多方法研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Jul 24;20(1):686. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05533-7.
7
The challenges of the integration of cancer survivorship care plans with electronic medical records.癌症生存者照护计划与电子病历整合的挑战。
Semin Oncol Nurs. 2015 Feb;31(1):73-8. doi: 10.1016/j.soncn.2014.12.001. Epub 2014 Dec 5.
8
Survivorship care plans: is there buy-in from community oncology providers?生存护理计划:社区肿瘤学提供者是否认同?
Cancer. 2014 Mar 1;120(5):722-30. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28472. Epub 2013 Dec 10.
9
Developing a survivorship care plan (SCP) delivery process for patients and primary care providers serving poor, rural, and minority patients with cancer.为服务贫困、农村和少数族裔癌症患者的患者和初级保健提供者制定生存护理计划(SCP)交付流程。
Support Care Cancer. 2021 Sep;29(9):5021-5028. doi: 10.1007/s00520-021-06043-w. Epub 2021 Feb 15.
10
Survivorship care planning in skin cancer: An unbiased statistical approach to identifying patterns of care-plan use.皮肤癌的生存护理计划:一种识别护理计划使用模式的无偏统计方法。
Cancer. 2018 Jan 1;124(1):183-191. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30985. Epub 2017 Sep 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Primary care providers and their needs caring for cancer survivors: a qualitative study.初级保健提供者及其对癌症幸存者的护理需求:一项定性研究。
J Cancer Surviv. 2025 Jun 23. doi: 10.1007/s11764-025-01852-y.
2
Exploring Motives Behind Ideal Melanoma Survivorship Care Plans With Multiple Stakeholders: A Cocreation Study.与多方利益相关者共同探讨理想黑色素瘤幸存者护理计划背后的动机:一项共创研究。
JMIR Cancer. 2025 Jan 2;11:e55746. doi: 10.2196/55746.
3
Healthcare providers' expected barriers and facilitators to the implementation of person-centered long-term follow-up care for childhood cancer survivors: A PanCareFollowUp study.
医疗保健提供者对实施以患者为中心的儿童癌症幸存者长期随访护理的预期障碍和促进因素:PanCareFollowUp 研究。
Cancer Med. 2024 Oct;13(20):e70225. doi: 10.1002/cam4.70225.
4
Use of Cancer Survivorship Care Guidelines by Primary Care Providers in the United States.美国初级保健提供者对癌症生存者照护指南的使用情况。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2023 Oct 11;36(5):789-802. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2023.230036R1. Epub 2023 Sep 29.
5
Childhood cancer survivorship care: A qualitative study of healthcare providers' professional preferences.儿童癌症幸存者护理:一项关于医疗服务提供者专业偏好的定性研究。
Front Oncol. 2022 Oct 4;12:945911. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.945911. eCollection 2022.
6
Which Electronic Health Record System Should We Use? A Systematic Review.我们应该使用哪种电子健康记录系统?系统评价。
Med Princ Pract. 2022;31(4):342-351. doi: 10.1159/000525135. Epub 2022 May 18.
7
Health information technology to support cancer survivorship care planning: A systematic review.健康信息技术支持癌症生存者照护计划:系统评价。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Sep 18;28(10):2277-2286. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocab134.
8
The Integration of Survivorship Care Planning at a Comprehensive Cancer Center.综合癌症中心的癌症生存护理计划整合
J Adv Pract Oncol. 2019 Jul;10(5):461-468. doi: 10.6004/jadpro.2019.10.5.4. Epub 2019 Jul 1.
9
A Comparative Analysis of Online Medical Record Utilization and Perception by Cancer Survivorship.癌症康复者在线病历利用和认知的对比分析
Med Care. 2020 Dec;58(12):1075-1081. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001413.
10
Utilization of an audit tool to evaluate accuracy of treatment summary and survivorship care plans.利用审核工具评估治疗总结和生存护理计划的准确性。
J Cancer Surviv. 2019 Dec;13(6):890-898. doi: 10.1007/s11764-019-00804-7. Epub 2019 Aug 31.