• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用审核工具评估治疗总结和生存护理计划的准确性。

Utilization of an audit tool to evaluate accuracy of treatment summary and survivorship care plans.

机构信息

Cancer Support Services, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center-The James Cancer Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA.

College of Nursing, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.

出版信息

J Cancer Surviv. 2019 Dec;13(6):890-898. doi: 10.1007/s11764-019-00804-7. Epub 2019 Aug 31.

DOI:10.1007/s11764-019-00804-7
PMID:31473902
Abstract

PURPOSE

A quality review process was implemented to determine compliance with the requirement from the Commission on Cancer to use the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) template as the minimum data set for Treatment Summary and Survivorship Care Plans (TS/SCP) provided to cancer survivors.

METHODS

TS/SCPs generated during 2017 (N = 1257) were audited for concordance with each of the 66 TS/SCP line items on ASCO's template. Descriptive statistics and chi-square statistics were used to examine line item concordance, overall and by services groups (survivorship vs. other oncology service). Mixed-effects logistic regression was used to estimate the effects of service delivery group on the concordance.

RESULTS

Institutional compliance with the ASCO template was very high; 76% of the 66 line items were present in at least 75% of the delivered TS/SCPs. There was a significantly higher rate of concordance for TS/SCPs provided by the survivorship service (83% vs. 66%, P = 0.006). TS/SCPs provided by the survivorship service were nearly twice as likely to be concordant with ASCO template (OR = 1.88, 95% CI = 1.77-2.00) compared to those by other service groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of the electronic medical record to auto-populate information was instrumental in achieving a high rate of concordance. Institutions should consider providing training to improve or maintain quality of these documents.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS

Ensuring that the information contained on the TS/SCP is consistently present is necessary for a high-quality survivorship visit between the clinician, PCP, and survivor and as a record of care for future health care encounters.

摘要

目的

实施质量审查流程,以确定是否符合癌症委员会的要求,即使用美国临床肿瘤学会 (ASCO) 模板作为提供给癌症幸存者的治疗总结和生存护理计划 (TS/SCP) 的最小数据集。

方法

对 2017 年生成的 TS/SCP(N=1257)进行审核,以检查其与 ASCO 模板的 66 个 TS/SCP 项目中的每一个的一致性。使用描述性统计和卡方检验来检查项目一致性,以及按服务组(生存组与其他肿瘤服务组)进行的一致性。采用混合效应逻辑回归来估计服务提供组对一致性的影响。

结果

机构对 ASCO 模板的遵从度非常高;66 个项目中有 76%至少出现在 75%的交付 TS/SCP 中。生存服务提供的 TS/SCP 一致性率明显更高(83%与 66%,P=0.006)。与其他服务组相比,生存服务提供的 TS/SCP 更有可能与 ASCO 模板一致(OR=1.88,95%CI=1.77-2.00)。

结论

使用电子病历自动填充信息是实现高一致性率的重要手段。各机构应考虑提供培训,以提高或保持这些文件的质量。

对癌症幸存者的影响

确保 TS/SCP 中包含的信息始终存在,对于临床医生、初级保健医生和幸存者之间的高质量生存随访以及作为未来医疗保健接触记录的护理记录都是必要的。

相似文献

1
Utilization of an audit tool to evaluate accuracy of treatment summary and survivorship care plans.利用审核工具评估治疗总结和生存护理计划的准确性。
J Cancer Surviv. 2019 Dec;13(6):890-898. doi: 10.1007/s11764-019-00804-7. Epub 2019 Aug 31.
2
Impact of Survivorship Care Plans and Planning on Breast, Colon, and Prostate Cancer Survivors in a Community Oncology Practice.社区肿瘤医疗实践中生存护理计划及规划对乳腺癌、结肠癌和前列腺癌幸存者的影响
J Cancer Educ. 2020 Apr;35(2):249-255. doi: 10.1007/s13187-018-1457-y.
3
Metrics to evaluate treatment summaries and survivorship care plans: a scorecard.评估治疗总结和生存护理计划的指标:评分卡。
Support Care Cancer. 2014 Jun;22(6):1475-83. doi: 10.1007/s00520-013-2107-x. Epub 2014 Jan 12.
4
Use of survivorship care plans in the United States: associations with survivorship care.美国生存护理计划的使用:与生存护理的关联。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013 Oct 16;105(20):1579-87. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djt258. Epub 2013 Oct 4.
5
The Impact of a Primary Care Education Program Regarding Cancer Survivorship Care Plans: Results from an Engineering, Primary Care, and Oncology Collaborative for Survivorship Health.一项关于癌症幸存者护理计划的初级保健教育项目的影响:一项针对幸存者健康的工程、初级保健和肿瘤学协作研究的结果。
J Cancer Educ. 2019 Feb;34(1):154-160. doi: 10.1007/s13187-017-1281-9.
6
Survivorship care planning in skin cancer: An unbiased statistical approach to identifying patterns of care-plan use.皮肤癌的生存护理计划:一种识别护理计划使用模式的无偏统计方法。
Cancer. 2018 Jan 1;124(1):183-191. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30985. Epub 2017 Sep 8.
7
Identifying barriers to cancer survivors sharing their survivorship care plans with their healthcare provider.确定癌症幸存者与医疗服务提供者分享生存护理计划的障碍。
J Cancer Surviv. 2018 Oct;12(5):632-638. doi: 10.1007/s11764-018-0699-3. Epub 2018 Jul 3.
8
Development and evaluation of a bladder Cancer specific survivorship care plan by patients and clinical care providers: a multi-methods approach.患者和临床护理提供者共同制定和评估膀胱癌特定生存护理计划:一种多方法研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Jul 24;20(1):686. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05533-7.
9
Barriers and facilitators to implementing cancer survivorship care plans.实施癌症幸存者护理计划的障碍与促进因素。
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2013 Nov;40(6):575-80. doi: 10.1188/13.ONF.575-580.
10
American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical expert statement on cancer survivorship care planning.美国临床肿瘤学会关于癌症生存护理计划的临床专家声明。
J Oncol Pract. 2014 Nov;10(6):345-51. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2014.001321. Epub 2014 Oct 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Health information technology to support cancer survivorship care planning: A systematic review.健康信息技术支持癌症生存者照护计划:系统评价。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Sep 18;28(10):2277-2286. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocab134.

本文引用的文献

1
Strategies for Successful Survivorship Care Plan Implementation: Results From a Qualitative Study.成功实施生存护理计划的策略:一项定性研究的结果。
J Oncol Pract. 2018 Aug;14(8):e462-e483. doi: 10.1200/JOP.17.00054. Epub 2018 Jul 13.
2
Survivorship Care Plan Implementation in US Cancer Programs: a National Survey of Cancer Care Providers.美国癌症项目中的幸存者护理计划实施情况:癌症护理提供者的全国性调查。
J Cancer Educ. 2019 Jun;34(3):614-622. doi: 10.1007/s13187-018-1374-0.
3
Systematic Review of the Impact of Cancer Survivorship Care Plans on Health Outcomes and Health Care Delivery.
癌症生存者照护计划对健康结局和医疗保健提供的影响的系统评价
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Jul 10;36(20):2088-2100. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2018.77.7482. Epub 2018 May 18.
4
Accuracy and Thoroughness of Treatment Summaries Provided as Part of Survivorship Care Plans Prepared by Two Cancer Centers.作为两个癌症中心制定的幸存者护理计划一部分所提供的治疗总结的准确性和全面性。
J Oncol Pract. 2017 May;13(5):e486-e495. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2016.018648. Epub 2017 Feb 21.
5
Feasibility Study of an Electronic Interface Between Internet-Based Survivorship Care Plans and Electronic Medical Records.基于互联网的幸存者护理计划与电子病历之间电子接口的可行性研究。
J Oncol Pract. 2016 Apr;12(4):e380-7. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2015.006841. Epub 2016 Mar 22.
6
Survivorship care plan preferences of cancer survivors and health care providers: a systematic review and quality appraisal of the evidence.癌症幸存者与医疗服务提供者的幸存者护理计划偏好:证据的系统评价与质量评估
J Cancer Surviv. 2016 Feb;10(1):71-86. doi: 10.1007/s11764-015-0452-0. Epub 2015 Apr 25.
7
The challenges of the integration of cancer survivorship care plans with electronic medical records.癌症生存者照护计划与电子病历整合的挑战。
Semin Oncol Nurs. 2015 Feb;31(1):73-8. doi: 10.1016/j.soncn.2014.12.001. Epub 2014 Dec 5.
8
American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical expert statement on cancer survivorship care planning.美国临床肿瘤学会关于癌症生存护理计划的临床专家声明。
J Oncol Pract. 2014 Nov;10(6):345-51. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2014.001321. Epub 2014 Oct 14.
9
Survivorship care plans in cancer: a systematic review of care plan outcomes.癌症幸存者护理计划:护理计划结果的系统评价
Br J Cancer. 2014 Nov 11;111(10):1899-908. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.505. Epub 2014 Oct 14.
10
Summing it up: an integrative review of studies of cancer survivorship care plans (2006-2013).总结:癌症生存护理计划研究的综合综述(2006 - 2013年)
Cancer. 2015 Apr 1;121(7):978-96. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28884. Epub 2014 Sep 23.