Monjezi Saeideh, Negahban Hossein, Tajali Shirin, Yadollahpour Nava, Majdinasab Nastaran
1 Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation Research Center, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.
2 Department of Physical Therapy, School of Paramedical Sciences, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Clin Rehabil. 2017 Feb;31(2):234-241. doi: 10.1177/0269215516639735. Epub 2016 Jul 10.
To investigate the effects of dual-task balance training on postural performance in patients with multiple sclerosis as compared with single-task balance training.
Double-blind, pretest-posttest, randomized controlled pilot trial.
Local Multiple Sclerosis Society.
A total of 47 patients were randomly assigned to two equal groups labeled as single-task training and dual-task training groups.
All patients received supervised balance training sessions, 3 times per week for 4 weeks. The patients in the single-task group performed balance activities, alone. However, patients in dual-task group practiced balance activities while simultaneously performing cognitive tasks.
The 10-Meter Walk Test and Timed Up-and-Go under single-task and dual-task conditions, in addition to Activities-specific Balance Confidence, Berg Balance Scale, and Functional Gait Assessment were assessed pre-, and post intervention and also 6-weeks after the end of intervention.
Only 38 patients completed the treatment plan. There was no difference in the amount of improvement seen between the two study groups. In both groups there was a significant effect of time for dual-10 Meter Walk Test (F=11.33, p=0.002) and dual-Timed Up-and-Go (F=14.27, p=0.001) but not for their single-tasks. Moreover, there was a significant effect of time for Activities-specific Balance Confidence, Berg Balance Scale, and Functional Gait Assessment ( P<0.01).
This pilot study did not show more benefits from undertaking dual-task training than single-task training. A power analysis showed 71 patients per group would be needed to determine whether there was a clinically relevant difference for dual-task gait speed between the groups.
与单任务平衡训练相比,研究双任务平衡训练对多发性硬化症患者姿势表现的影响。
双盲、前测-后测、随机对照试验。
当地多发性硬化症协会。
总共47名患者被随机分为两组,分别标记为单任务训练组和双任务训练组。
所有患者接受有监督的平衡训练课程,每周3次,共4周。单任务组的患者单独进行平衡活动。然而,双任务组的患者在进行平衡活动的同时还要执行认知任务。
在单任务和双任务条件下进行10米步行测试和计时起立行走测试,此外,在干预前、干预后以及干预结束后6周评估特定活动平衡信心、伯格平衡量表和功能性步态评估。
只有38名患者完成了治疗计划。两个研究组之间观察到的改善程度没有差异。两组在双任务10米步行测试(F = 11.33,p = 0.002)和双任务计时起立行走测试(F = 14.27,p = 0.001)中时间效应显著,但单任务测试中没有。此外,特定活动平衡信心、伯格平衡量表和功能性步态评估的时间效应显著(P < 0.01)。
这项初步研究没有显示出双任务训练比单任务训练有更多益处。功效分析表明,每组需要71名患者才能确定两组之间双任务步态速度是否存在临床相关差异。