Khammash Mustafa
Department of Biosystems Science and Engineering, ETH Zürich, Switzerland.
BMC Biol. 2016 Mar 23;14:22. doi: 10.1186/s12915-016-0241-x.
In his splendid article "Can a biologist fix a radio?--or, what I learned while studying apoptosis," Y. Lazebnik argues that when one uses the right tools, similarity between a biological system, like a signal transduction pathway, and an engineered system, like a radio, may not seem so superficial. Here I advance this idea by focusing on the notion of robustness as a unifying lens through which to view complexity in biological and engineered systems. I show that electronic amplifiers and gene expression circuits share remarkable similarities in their dynamics and robustness properties. I explore robustness features and limitations in biology and engineering and highlight the role of negative feedback in shaping both.
Y. 拉泽布尼克在其精彩的文章《生物学家能修理收音机吗?——或者,我在研究细胞凋亡时学到的东西》中指出,当使用正确的工具时,生物系统(如信号转导通路)与工程系统(如收音机)之间的相似性可能并不那么表面。在这里,我通过将稳健性这一概念作为一个统一的视角来审视生物和工程系统中的复杂性,推进了这一观点。我表明,电子放大器和基因表达电路在其动态特性和稳健性方面有着显著的相似之处。我探讨了生物学和工程学中的稳健性特征及局限性,并强调了负反馈在塑造两者中的作用。