Comparison of two MR grading systems for correlation between grade of cervical neural foraminal stenosis and clinical manifestations.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the reliability of two recently reported MR grading systems of cervical neural foraminal stenosis (CNFS) and their correlation with clinical manifestations.

METHODS

We evaluated 188 patients (male : female = 80 : 108; mean age of 41 years) who visited our institution and underwent oblique sagittal MRI of the cervical spine. Two radiologists evaluated the MRI findings for the presence and grade of CNFS at the narrowest point, with the grading systems (Park, Kim and mKim systems) suggested by Park et al and Kim et al. More than one positive neurologic sign and more than one neurologic clinical symptom was considered a positive neurologic manifestation of each foraminal stenosis. Interobserver agreement between the two readers was analyzed using kappa statistics. Non-parametric correlation analysis (Spearman's correlation) was used to evaluate the correlation coefficients (R) to assess the relationship between CNFS grade and clinical manifestations.

RESULTS

Both the Park and mKim systems demonstrated a relatively high correlation (R = 0.714-0.764) between the CNFS grade and clinical manifestation, while the Kim system yielded a moderate correlation (by Reader 2). The Park and mKim systems demonstrated higher correlation values at the level of C6-7 than C4-5, while the Kim system showed no difference in correlation at the cervical spine level.

CONCLUSION

Both the Park and mKim systems provide a reliable, reproducible CNFS diagnosis, while the Kim system has a slightly inferior reliability. The Park and mKim systems had a similar, relatively high clinical correlation.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

Grades 2 and 3 of the Park system and Grade 2 in the Kim and mKim systems exhibited a similar clinical significance. Patients with a grade of 0 (using each system) consistently exhibit negative neurologic manifestation.