• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

支持性决策:痴呆症患者的权利

Supported decision making: the rights of people with dementia.

作者信息

Keeling Amanda

机构信息

School of Law, University of Leeds, Leeds, England.

出版信息

Nurs Stand. 2016 Mar 23;30(30):38-44. doi: 10.7748/ns.30.30.38.s45.

DOI:10.7748/ns.30.30.38.s45
PMID:27008152
Abstract

The Mental Capacity Act 2005 is used to assess a person's decision-making ability and to make a best interests decision where the individual lacks the capacity to do so. The act was considered to have the potential to maximise the autonomy of individuals with mental or cognitive impairments, but this has not been fully realised. Since the act came into force, the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities has challenged many of the principles underpinning the act. That challenge and how existing provisions in the act can be implemented to increase autonomy and control for people with cognitive or mental impairments are discussed. The principles of the convention are described and potential future amendments to the law are identified.

摘要

《2005年精神能力法案》用于评估个人的决策能力,并在个人缺乏决策能力时做出符合其最大利益的决定。该法案被认为有潜力最大限度地提高有精神或认知障碍者的自主权,但这一点尚未完全实现。自该法案生效以来,《联合国残疾人权利公约》对该法案所依据的许多原则提出了挑战。本文将讨论这一挑战以及如何实施该法案的现有条款,以增强认知或精神障碍者的自主权和控制权。文中描述了该公约的原则,并确定了未来可能对该法律进行的修订。

相似文献

1
Supported decision making: the rights of people with dementia.支持性决策:痴呆症患者的权利
Nurs Stand. 2016 Mar 23;30(30):38-44. doi: 10.7748/ns.30.30.38.s45.
2
An international comparison of legal frameworks for supported and substitute decision-making in mental health services.精神卫生服务中支持性和替代性决策法律框架的国际比较。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2016 Jan-Feb;44:30-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2015.08.029. Epub 2015 Aug 28.
3
The impact of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) on Victorian guardianship practice.《联合国残疾人权利公约》对维多利亚州监护实践的影响。
Disabil Rehabil. 2022 Jun;44(12):2806-2814. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2020.1836680. Epub 2020 Oct 23.
4
A Fine Balance: Reconsidering Patient Autonomy in Light of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.微妙的平衡:根据《联合国残疾人权利公约》重新审视患者自主权
Bioethics. 2015 Jul;29(6):398-405. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12133. Epub 2014 Dec 10.
5
The United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: a new approach to decision-making in mental health law.《联合国残疾人权利公约》:精神卫生法决策的新方法。
Eur J Health Law. 2012 Dec;19(5):423-40. doi: 10.1163/15718093-12341237.
6
Supported decision-making and personal autonomy for persons with intellectual disabilities: article 12 of the UN convention on the rights of persons with disabilities.为智障人士提供支持性决策和个人自主:《联合国残疾人权利公约》第十二条
J Law Med Ethics. 2013 Winter;41(4):792-806, Table of Contents. doi: 10.1111/jlme.12090.
7
Deciding in dementia: The possibilities and limits of supported decision-making.痴呆症决策:支持决策的可能性和局限性。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2019 Sep-Oct;66:101466. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2019.101466. Epub 2019 Jul 17.
8
Best Interests in the Mental Capacity Act: Time to say Goodbye?《精神能力法案》中的最大利益原则:是时候说再见了吗?
Med Law Rev. 2016 Summer;24(3):318-332. doi: 10.1093/medlaw/fww030.
9
Situating dementia in the experience of old age: Reconstructing legal response.将痴呆置于老年体验中:重构法律应对。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2019 Sep-Oct;66:101468. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2019.101468. Epub 2019 Jul 17.
10
Getting the Balance Right: Conceptual Considerations Concerning Legal Capacity and Supported Decision-Making.把握正确平衡:关于法律行为能力与辅助决策的概念性思考
J Bioeth Inq. 2016 Sep;13(3):381-93. doi: 10.1007/s11673-016-9727-z. Epub 2016 Jun 21.

引用本文的文献

1
'Do I have the capacity to make capacity judgements?' Researcher reflections from a person-centred dementia support study.“我有能力做出能力判断吗?”一项以患者为中心的痴呆症支持研究中的研究人员反思。
Dementia (London). 2022 Apr;21(3):972-994. doi: 10.1177/14713012211067320. Epub 2022 Feb 11.
2
Dementia, Treatment Decisions, and the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons With Disabilities. A New Framework for Old Problems.痴呆症、治疗决策与《联合国残疾人权利公约》。解决老问题的新框架。
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Nov 9;11:571722. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.571722. eCollection 2020.
3
"A Real Bucket of Worms": Views of People Living with Dementia and Family Members on Supported Decision-Making.
“真是一堆麻烦事”:痴呆症患者及其家属对支持性决策的看法。
J Bioeth Inq. 2019 Dec;16(4):587-608. doi: 10.1007/s11673-019-09945-x. Epub 2019 Dec 12.
4
Planning Ahead for Dementia Research Participation: Insights from a Survey of Older Australians and Implications for Ethics, Law and Practice.为痴呆症研究参与提前规划:来自对澳大利亚老年人调查的见解及对伦理、法律和实践的影响。
J Bioeth Inq. 2019 Sep;16(3):415-429. doi: 10.1007/s11673-019-09929-x. Epub 2019 Jul 11.
5
Significance of advance care planning in nursing homes: views from patients with cognitive impairment, their next of kin, health personnel, and managers.养老院中预先护理计划的意义:认知障碍患者、其近亲属、卫生人员和管理人员的观点。
Clin Interv Aging. 2019 May 29;14:997-1005. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S203298. eCollection 2019.
6
Multimedia Aided Consent for Alzheimer's Disease Research.阿尔茨海默病研究的多媒体辅助同意书
Clin Gerontol. 2018 Jan-Feb;41(1):20-32. doi: 10.1080/07317115.2017.1373177. Epub 2017 Nov 28.