Britt Frisk Pados is an Assistant Professor, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Nursing, Chapel Hill, NC.Jinhee Park is an Assistant Professor, Boston College School of Nursing, Boston, MA.Suzanne M. Thoyre is a Francis Hill Fox Distinguished Term Professor, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Nursing, Chapel Hill, NC.Hayley Estrem is Postdoctoral Associate, Duke University School of Nursing, Durham, NC.W. Brant Nix is a Medical Laboratory Technologist & Lab Manager, Biobehavioral Laboratory, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Nursing, Chapel Hill, NC.
MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 2016 Jul/Aug;41(4):237-243. doi: 10.1097/NMC.0000000000000244.
To test the milk flow rates and variability in flow rates of bottle nipples used after hospital discharge.
Twenty-six nipple types that represented 15 common brands as well as variety in price per nipple and store location sold (e.g., Babies R' Us, Walmart, Dollar Store) were chosen for testing. Ten of each nipple type (n = 260 total) were tested by measuring the amount of infant formula expressed in 1 minute using a breast pump. Mean milk flow rate (mL/min) and coefficient of variation (CV) were calculated. Flow rates of nipples within brand were compared statistically.
Milk flow rates varied from 1.68 mL/min for the Avent Natural Newborn Flow to 85.34 mL/min for the Dr. Brown's Standard Y-cut. Variability between nipple types also varied widely, from .03 for the Dr. Brown's Standard Level 3 to .37 for MAM Nipple 1 Slow Flow.
The extreme range of milk flow rates found may be significant for medically fragile infants being discharged home who are continuing to develop oral feeding skills. The name of the nipple does not provide clear information about the flow rate to guide parents in decision making. Variability in flow rates within nipples of the same type may complicate oral feeding for the medically fragile infant who may not be able to adapt easily to change in flow rates. Both flow rate and variability should be considered when guiding parents to a nipple choice.
测试出院后使用的奶瓶奶嘴的奶液流速及其流速变化。
选择了 26 种奶嘴类型,代表了 15 个常见品牌,价格和销售地点各不相同(例如,婴儿反斗城、沃尔玛、一元店)。用吸奶器测量 1 分钟内挤出的婴儿配方奶粉量,对每种奶嘴类型的 10 个样本(共 260 个)进行测试。计算平均奶液流速(mL/min)和变异系数(CV)。统计比较品牌内奶嘴的流速。
奶液流速从 Avent Natural Newborn Flow 的 1.68 mL/min 到 Dr. Brown's Standard Y-cut 的 85.34 mL/min 不等。奶嘴类型之间的流速变化也差异很大,从 Dr. Brown's Standard Level 3 的 0.03 到 MAM Nipple 1 Slow Flow 的 0.37。
发现的极端奶液流速范围可能对出院回家、正在继续发展口腔进食技能的医学脆弱婴儿具有重要意义。奶嘴的名称并不能提供关于流速的明确信息,无法指导父母做出决策。同一类型的奶嘴内部流速变化可能会使医学脆弱婴儿的口腔喂养复杂化,因为他们可能无法轻易适应流速变化。在指导父母选择奶嘴时,应同时考虑流速和流速变化。