• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

神经科护理中的不平等:服务可及性、护理差距及其他障碍——一项系统综述

Inequities in neurological care: Access to services, care gaps, and other barriers-A systematic review.

作者信息

Fornari Arianna, Lanza Martina, Guastafierro Erika, Marcassoli Alessia, Sismondo Pietro, Curatoli Chiara, Raggi Alberto, Leonardi Matilde

机构信息

Neurology, Public Health, and Disability Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy.

Department of Neurosurgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Eur J Neurol. 2025 Jan;32(1):e16553. doi: 10.1111/ene.16553. Epub 2024 Nov 25.

DOI:10.1111/ene.16553
PMID:39582360
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11625953/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Health disparities and inequities are an important and too long overlooked public health concern worldwide. These differences in health and health care can affect people with any disease, including neurological disorders. The aim of this systematic review is to provide an updated overview of the main health inequities faced by neurological patients worldwide, to plan valuable interventions.

METHODS

Main databases were searched systematically. Quality was assessed with the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. This review followed the standard guidelines of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 1797 studies were obtained, of which 49 studies were included in the final round and subjected to quality appraisal. Quality assessment yielded scores ranging from 20% to 100%. The results were divided based on the nature of inequities: (i) socioeconomic disadvantage (n = 25); and (ii) access to care, treatment, and services inequities (n = 24). Most studies were conducted in high income counties (n = 46, 93.8%) and reported health inequities in persons with cerebrovascular diseases, especially stroke (n = 20, 40.8%), followed by multiple sclerosis (n = 8, 16.3%) and neurodegenerative disorders (n = 6, 12.2%).

CONCLUSIONS

Racial and ethnic discrimination, economic issues, differences in disease management, educational level, and place of residence are the main inequities reported by neurological patients. The USA dominates the research panorama (n = 36, 73.4%), highlighting the need for more studies that cover other geopolitical contexts. Improving population health means improving health for everyone; however, historically disadvantaged groups continue to trail dramatically behind, and actions are needed to reduce the inequities.

摘要

背景与目的

健康差异与不平等是全球范围内一个重要且长期被忽视的公共卫生问题。这些健康及医疗方面的差异会影响患有任何疾病的人群,包括神经系统疾病患者。本系统综述的目的是提供全球神经疾病患者所面临的主要健康不平等状况的最新概述,以便规划有价值的干预措施。

方法

对主要数据库进行了系统检索。使用混合方法评估工具对质量进行评估。本综述遵循系统评价与荟萃分析的首选报告项目的标准指南。

结果

共获得1797项研究,其中49项研究纳入最终轮次并进行质量评估。质量评估得分在20%至100%之间。结果根据不平等的性质进行划分:(i)社会经济劣势(n = 25);(ii)获得医疗、治疗和服务的不平等(n = 24)。大多数研究在高收入国家进行(n = 46,93.8%),报告了脑血管疾病患者的健康不平等情况,尤其是中风(n = 20,40.8%),其次是多发性硬化症(n = 8,16.3%)和神经退行性疾病(n = 6,12.2%)。

结论

种族和民族歧视、经济问题、疾病管理差异、教育水平和居住地点是神经疾病患者报告的主要不平等因素。美国在研究领域占主导地位(n = 36,73.4%),这凸显了需要开展更多涵盖其他地缘政治背景的研究。改善人群健康意味着改善每个人的健康;然而,历史上处于劣势的群体仍远远落后,需要采取行动减少不平等。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17ef/11625953/6e3044c58aff/ENE-32-e16553-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17ef/11625953/6e3044c58aff/ENE-32-e16553-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17ef/11625953/6e3044c58aff/ENE-32-e16553-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Inequities in neurological care: Access to services, care gaps, and other barriers-A systematic review.神经科护理中的不平等:服务可及性、护理差距及其他障碍——一项系统综述
Eur J Neurol. 2025 Jan;32(1):e16553. doi: 10.1111/ene.16553. Epub 2024 Nov 25.
2
Addressing Inequalities in Long Covid Healthcare: A Mixed-Methods Study on Building Inclusive Services.解决长期新冠医疗保健中的不平等问题:一项关于建立包容性服务的混合方法研究。
Health Expect. 2025 Aug;28(4):e70336. doi: 10.1111/hex.70336.
3
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
4
Antidepressants for pain management in adults with chronic pain: a network meta-analysis.抗抑郁药治疗成人慢性疼痛的疼痛管理:一项网络荟萃分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Oct;28(62):1-155. doi: 10.3310/MKRT2948.
5
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
6
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
7
The quantity, quality and findings of network meta-analyses evaluating the effectiveness of GLP-1 RAs for weight loss: a scoping review.评估胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP-1 RAs)减肥效果的网状Meta分析的数量、质量及结果:一项范围综述
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Jun 25:1-73. doi: 10.3310/SKHT8119.
8
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.拓扑替康治疗卵巢癌的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280.
9
Interventions for promoting habitual exercise in people living with and beyond cancer.促进癌症患者及康复者进行习惯性锻炼的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 19;9(9):CD010192. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010192.pub3.
10
Smoking cessation medicines and e-cigarettes: a systematic review, network meta-analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis.戒烟药物和电子烟:系统评价、网络荟萃分析和成本效益分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2021 Oct;25(59):1-224. doi: 10.3310/hta25590.

引用本文的文献

1
A Systematic Review of Attributes Influencing Preferences for Treatments and Interventions in People With Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS).肌萎缩侧索硬化症(ALS)患者对治疗和干预措施偏好的影响因素的系统评价
Muscle Nerve. 2025 Sep;72(3):359-382. doi: 10.1002/mus.28437. Epub 2025 May 23.
2
A systematic review of developments in mHealth smartphone applications for Transgender and Gender Diverse individuals.对适用于跨性别者和性别多样化个体的移动健康智能手机应用程序发展情况的系统评价。
NPJ Digit Med. 2025 May 21;8(1):298. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01668-1.
3
Race- and place-based disparities in multiple sclerosis care: A qualitative study of patient experiences.

本文引用的文献

1
Global incidence, prevalence, years lived with disability (YLDs), disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs), and healthy life expectancy (HALE) for 371 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories and 811 subnational locations, 1990-2021: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021.全球疾病、伤害和危险因素负担研究 2021 年,1990-2021 年全球 204 个国家和地区及 811 个次国家地区 371 种疾病和伤害的发病率、患病率、伤残损失生命年(YLDs)、伤残调整生命年(DALYs)以及健康期望寿命(HALE):系统分析
Lancet. 2024 May 18;403(10440):2133-2161. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)00757-8. Epub 2024 Apr 17.
2
Global, regional, and national burden of disorders affecting the nervous system, 1990-2021: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021.全球、区域和国家神经障碍疾病负担,1990-2021 年:2021 年全球疾病负担研究的系统分析。
Lancet Neurol. 2024 Apr;23(4):344-381. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(24)00038-3. Epub 2024 Mar 14.
3
多发性硬化症护理中基于种族和地域的差异:对患者经历的定性研究
Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin. 2025 May 8;11(2):20552173251336753. doi: 10.1177/20552173251336753. eCollection 2025 Apr-Jun.
4
Bridging the Gaps: Addressing Inequities in Neurological Care for Underserved Populations.弥合差距:解决弱势群体神经科护理中的不平等问题。
Eur J Neurol. 2025 Feb;32(2):e70073. doi: 10.1111/ene.70073.
Global age-sex-specific mortality, life expectancy, and population estimates in 204 countries and territories and 811 subnational locations, 1950-2021, and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic: a comprehensive demographic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021.204 个国家和地区及 811 个次国家级行政单位 1950 年至 2021 年的全球年龄、性别特异性死亡率、预期寿命和人口估计,以及 COVID-19 大流行的影响:2021 年全球疾病负担研究的综合人口分析。
Lancet. 2024 May 18;403(10440):1989-2056. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)00476-8. Epub 2024 Mar 11.
4
The World Health Organization Intersectoral Global Action Plan on Epilepsy and Other Neurological Disorders and the headache revolution: from headache burden to a global action plan for headache disorders.世界卫生组织部门间全球行动计划:癫痫和其他神经系统疾病以及头痛革命:从头痛负担到头痛疾病全球行动计划。
J Headache Pain. 2024 Jan 4;25(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s10194-023-01700-3.
5
Recommendations for the extraction, analysis, and presentation of results in scoping reviews.综述的提取、分析和结果呈现建议。
JBI Evid Synth. 2023 Mar 1;21(3):520-532. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-22-00123.
6
The impact of COVID-19 on patients with neurological disorders and their access to healthcare in Africa: A review of the literature.COVID-19 对非洲神经障碍患者及其获得医疗保健的影响:文献综述。
Brain Behav. 2022 Sep;12(9):e2742. doi: 10.1002/brb3.2742. Epub 2022 Aug 11.
7
Current management of acute ischemic stroke in Africa: A review of the literature.非洲急性缺血性中风的当前管理:文献综述
Eur J Neurol. 2022 Nov;29(11):3460-3465. doi: 10.1111/ene.15495. Epub 2022 Jul 26.
8
Letter: The World Health Organization's Intersectoral Global Action Plan on Epilepsy and Other Neurological Disorders 2022-2031.信函:世界卫生组织《2022-2031年癫痫和其他神经系统疾病部门间全球行动计划》
Neurosurgery. 2022 Jun 1;90(6):e201-e203. doi: 10.1227/neu.0000000000001976. Epub 2022 Apr 7.
9
Addressing racial and phenotypic bias in human neuroscience methods.解决人类神经科学方法中的种族和表型偏见。
Nat Neurosci. 2022 Apr;25(4):410-414. doi: 10.1038/s41593-022-01046-0. Epub 2022 Apr 5.
10
Exploring experiential elements, strategies and outcomes of quality participation for children with intellectual and developmental disabilities: A systematic scoping review.探索智力和发育障碍儿童高质量参与的体验要素、策略及结果:一项系统性综述。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2022 May;35(3):691-718. doi: 10.1111/jar.12982. Epub 2022 Feb 17.