Elliott Tessa Lillis Poirier, Marshall Kyra Stanise, Lake David Allen, Wofford Nancy Henderson, Davies George James
Armstrong State University, Savannah, GA.
Dekalb Medical, Atlanta, GA.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016 Sep 15;41(18):E1074-E1080. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001576.
Experimental randomized crossover.
The aim of the study was to determine whether sitting on a ball for 90 min/d instead of a chair has an effect on low back pain (LBP), low back disability, and/or core muscle endurance.
LBP may result from prolonged sitting. It has been proposed that replacing chairs with stability balls can diminish LBP in those who sit for prolonged periods. Research on the topic is sparse and inconclusive.
A total of 90 subjects (university students, staff, and faculty, ages 18-65, who sit ≥4 hr/d) were randomly assigned to the intervention or control group for the first part of the study. Baseline data were collected: Oswestry Disability Index, a numerical pain rating scale for LBP, and four core muscle endurance tests. For 8 weeks, the control group sat on their usual chair. The intervention group sat on stability balls 5 d/wk, increasing up to 90 min/d. Baseline measurements were repeated postintervention. After a washout period, subjects switched groups, and the procedures were repeated-70 completed participation in control group and 76 in intervention group.
There were no statistically significant differences for pain or disability in either group (P > 0.05). Changes in isometric trunk flexion (P = 0.001), nondominant side plank (P = 0.008), and Sorensen (P = 0.006) endurance scores were significant within the intervention group but not the control group. Between-group comparisons revealed a significant difference for isometric trunk flexion (P = 0.005) and Sorensen endurance times (P = 0.010). Analysis also showed that ball-sitting did not prevent an increase in LBP over the 8-week period.
Ball-sitting had no significant effects on LBP or associated disability, but did improve core endurance in the sagittal plane. Although ball-sitting may be useful as an adjunct treatment for LBP when core muscles are involved, clinicians should rely on other, evidence-based treatments for LBP.
实验性随机交叉试验。
本研究旨在确定每天坐健身球90分钟而非坐椅子是否会对腰痛(LBP)、腰部功能障碍和/或核心肌肉耐力产生影响。
长时间坐着可能导致腰痛。有人提出用稳定球取代椅子可以减轻长时间坐着的人的腰痛。关于这一主题的研究稀少且尚无定论。
在研究的第一部分,共有90名受试者(年龄在18 - 65岁之间,每天坐着≥4小时的大学生、工作人员和教师)被随机分配到干预组或对照组。收集基线数据:奥斯威斯利功能障碍指数、腰痛数字疼痛评分量表以及四项核心肌肉耐力测试。在8周时间里,对照组坐在他们常用的椅子上。干预组每周5天坐在稳定球上,每天时长逐渐增加至90分钟。干预后重复进行基线测量。经过洗脱期后,受试者更换组别,重复上述程序,70人完成了对照组的参与,76人完成了干预组的参与。
两组在疼痛或功能障碍方面均无统计学显著差异(P>0.05)。干预组等长躯干前屈(P = 0.001)、非优势侧平板支撑(P = 0.008)和索伦森(P = 0.006)耐力得分有显著变化,而对照组没有。组间比较显示等长躯干前屈(P = 0.005)和索伦森耐力时间(P = 0.010)存在显著差异。分析还表明,在8周期间坐健身球并不能防止腰痛增加。
坐健身球对腰痛或相关功能障碍没有显著影响,但确实改善了矢状面的核心耐力。虽然当涉及核心肌肉时,坐健身球可能作为腰痛的辅助治疗方法有用,但临床医生应依赖其他基于证据的腰痛治疗方法。