Samaiya Atul
LN Medical College and JK Hospital, Bhopal, India ; Navodaya Cancer Hospital, Bhopal, MP India ; C-6, Dwarkadham, Karond Bypass Road, Badwai, Near Central Jail, Bhopal, 462038 India.
Indian J Surg. 2015 Dec;77(Suppl 3):1363-8. doi: 10.1007/s12262-015-1259-y. Epub 2015 May 14.
Prophylactic drainage of abdominal cavity after GI surgery has been widely practiced. The most important signal function of prophylactic drain is to detect early complications. But the same drains could be the cause of some of the complications. Although there is a considerable theoretical and practical evidences in favor of drainage, the dispute about "to drain or not to drain" the peritoneal cavity after elective colorectal surgery remains open. Unfortunately, the principle of drainage is not based on any scientific data. During the last three decades, surgeons have made efforts to investigate the value of prophylactic drainage after colorectal surgery. However, the results of trials are contradictory due to lack of quality and/or statistical power and therefore do not provide an answer to the clinical question. A systematic review of studies suggests that there is insufficient evidence for routine use of drain after colorectal surgery. Despite evidence-based data questioning prophylactic drainage of abdominal cavity in many instances, most surgeons around the world continue to use drains on a routine basis until now. There are strong evidences in literature in favor of no apparent benefit of drainage for supra-peritoneal anastomoses; however, there is still controversies regarding drainage of infra-peritoneal rectal anastomoses.
胃肠道手术后腹腔预防性引流已被广泛应用。预防性引流管最重要的信号功能是早期发现并发症。但同样的引流管也可能是一些并发症的起因。尽管有大量理论和实践证据支持引流,但关于择期结直肠手术后“是否进行腹腔引流”的争议仍然存在。不幸的是,引流原则并非基于任何科学数据。在过去三十年里,外科医生一直在努力研究结直肠手术后预防性引流的价值。然而,由于研究质量和/或统计效力不足,试验结果相互矛盾,因此无法回答临床问题。一项系统性研究回顾表明,没有足够证据支持结直肠手术后常规使用引流管。尽管在许多情况下有循证医学数据对腹腔预防性引流提出质疑,但直到现在,世界各地的大多数外科医生仍在常规使用引流管。文献中有充分证据表明,对于腹膜上吻合术,引流并无明显益处;然而,对于腹膜下直肠吻合术的引流仍存在争议。