Hobeika Lucie, Diard-Detoeuf Capucine, Garcin Béatrice, Levy Richard, Volle Emmanuelle
Inserm, U 1127, Paris, 75013, France.
CNRS UMR 7225, Paris, 75013, France.
Hum Brain Mapp. 2016 May;37(5):1953-69. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23149. Epub 2016 Mar 25.
Reasoning by analogy allows us to link distinct domains of knowledge and to transfer solutions from one domain to another. Analogical reasoning has been studied using various tasks that have generally required the consideration of the relationships between objects and their integration to infer an analogy schema. However, these tasks varied in terms of the level and the nature of the relationships to consider (e.g., semantic, visuospatial). The aim of this study was to identify the cerebral network involved in analogical reasoning and its specialization based on the domains of information and task specificity. We conducted a coordinate-based meta-analysis of 27 experiments that used analogical reasoning tasks. The left rostrolateral prefrontal cortex was one of the regions most consistently activated across the studies. A comparison between semantic and visuospatial analogy tasks showed both domain-oriented regions in the inferior and middle frontal gyri and a domain-general region, the left rostrolateral prefrontal cortex, which was specialized for analogy tasks. A comparison of visuospatial analogy to matrix problem tasks revealed that these two relational reasoning tasks engage, at least in part, distinct right and left cerebral networks, particularly separate areas within the left rostrolateral prefrontal cortex. These findings highlight several cognitive and cerebral differences between relational reasoning tasks that can allow us to make predictions about the respective roles of distinct brain regions or networks. These results also provide new, testable anatomical hypotheses about reasoning disorders that are induced by brain damage. Hum Brain Mapp 37:1953-1969, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
类比推理使我们能够将不同的知识领域联系起来,并将解决方案从一个领域转移到另一个领域。人们使用各种任务对类比推理进行了研究,这些任务通常需要考虑对象之间的关系及其整合,以推断出类比模式。然而,这些任务在要考虑的关系的层次和性质方面(例如语义、视觉空间)各不相同。本研究的目的是确定参与类比推理的大脑网络及其基于信息领域和任务特异性的专业化。我们对27项使用类比推理任务的实验进行了基于坐标的元分析。左侧额前外侧皮层是各项研究中最一致被激活的区域之一。语义类比任务和视觉空间类比任务之间的比较显示,额下回和额中回中既有面向领域的区域,也有一个领域通用区域,即专门用于类比任务的左侧额前外侧皮层。视觉空间类比任务与矩阵问题任务的比较表明,这两种关系推理任务至少部分涉及不同的左右脑网络,特别是左侧额前外侧皮层内的不同区域。这些发现突出了关系推理任务之间的几个认知和大脑差异,这使我们能够对不同脑区或网络的各自作用做出预测。这些结果还为脑损伤引起的推理障碍提供了新的、可检验的解剖学假设。《人类大脑图谱》37:1953 - 1969, 2016。© 2016威利期刊公司。