Department of Neurology and Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, 3 West Gates Building, 3400 Spruce St., University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Neuroimage. 2012 Feb 1;59(3):2831-8. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.030. Epub 2011 Sep 29.
Our ability to reason by analogy facilitates problem solving and allows us to communicate ideas efficiently. In this study, we examined the neural correlates of analogical reasoning and, more specifically, the contribution of rostrolateral prefrontal cortex (RLPFC) to reasoning. This area of the brain has been hypothesized to integrate relational information, as in analogy, or the outcomes of subgoals, as in multi-tasking and complex problem solving. Using fMRI, we compared visuospatial analogical reasoning to a control task that was as complex and difficult as the analogies and required the coordination of subgoals but not the integration of relations. We found that analogical reasoning more strongly activated bilateral RLPFC, suggesting that anterior prefrontal cortex is preferentially recruited by the integration of relational knowledge. Consistent with the need for inhibition during analogy, bilateral, and particularly right, inferior frontal gyri were also more active during analogy. Finally, greater activity in bilateral inferior parietal cortex during the analogy task is consistent with recent evidence for the neural basis of spatial relation knowledge. Together, these findings indicate that a network of frontoparietal areas underlies analogical reasoning; we also suggest that hemispheric differences may emerge depending on the visuospatial or verbal/semantic nature of the analogies.
我们通过类比进行推理的能力有助于解决问题,并使我们能够高效地交流思想。在这项研究中,我们考察了类比推理的神经关联,更具体地说,考察了额侧前扣带回(RLPFC)对推理的贡献。该脑区被假设整合关系信息,如类比推理中,或者整合子目标的结果,如多任务处理和复杂问题解决中。我们使用 fMRI 比较了视空间类比推理和一个控制任务,该控制任务与类比推理一样复杂和困难,需要协调子目标,但不需要整合关系。我们发现类比推理更强烈地激活双侧 RLPFC,这表明前额皮质优先被关系知识的整合所招募。与类比推理中需要抑制一致,双侧、特别是右侧额下回也在类比推理中更活跃。最后,类比任务中双侧顶下小叶的活动增加与最近关于空间关系知识的神经基础的证据一致。总之,这些发现表明,额顶叶区域网络是类比推理的基础;我们还认为,根据类比推理的视空间或语言/语义性质,可能会出现半球差异。