Suppr超能文献

测试预期行动和不作为遗憾对意图及行为的作用。

Testing the role of action and inaction anticipated regret on intentions and behaviour.

作者信息

Sandberg Tracy, Hutter Russell, Richetin Juliette, Conner Mark

机构信息

School of Psychology, University of Leeds, UK.

Department of Psychology, University of Milan-Bicocca, Italy.

出版信息

Br J Soc Psychol. 2016 Sep;55(3):407-25. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12141. Epub 2016 Mar 25.

Abstract

Anticipated regret (AR) has been suggested as a useful addition to the theory of planned behaviour (TPB) that captures affective influences. However, previous research has generally (1) assessed the impact of AR in relation to one behaviour (action or inaction) when considering TPB variables in relation to the alternative behaviour, (2) not controlled for affective attitudes or past behaviour, and (3) examined only one or two behaviours. In two studies across several behaviours, the present research showed that even when controlling for affective attitudes, past behaviour, and other TPB variables towards action, action and inaction AR each added to the prediction of intentions across multiple behaviours. The two studies also showed that inaction regret was generally the stronger predictor, although action regret was important for some types of behaviour. Implications and issues for further research are discussed.

摘要

预期后悔(AR)被认为是对计划行为理论(TPB)的有益补充,该理论能够捕捉情感影响。然而,以往的研究通常存在以下问题:(1)在考虑TPB变量与替代行为的关系时,仅评估了AR对一种行为(行动或不行动)的影响;(2)未控制情感态度或过去的行为;(3)仅研究了一两种行为。在两项针对多种行为的研究中,本研究表明,即使在控制了情感态度、过去的行为以及对行动的其他TPB变量之后,行动和不行动的AR均能增加对多种行为意图的预测。这两项研究还表明,尽管行动后悔对某些类型的行为很重要,但不行动后悔通常是更强的预测因素。本文讨论了研究的意义及进一步研究的问题。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验