Prevention Strategies, LLC, Brown Summit, NC, United States.
LARS Research Institute, Scottsdale, AZ, United States.
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Jul 29;7(7):e14655. doi: 10.2196/14655.
The widespread adoption of smartphones provides researchers with expanded opportunities for developing, testing and implementing interventions. National Institutes of Health (NIH) funds competitive, investigator-initiated grant applications. Funded grants represent the state of the science and therefore are expected to anticipate the progression of research in the near future.
The objective of this paper is to provide an analysis of the kinds of smartphone-based intervention apps funded in NIH research grants during the five-year period between 2014 and 2018.
We queried NIH Reporter to identify candidate funded grants that addressed mHealth and the use of smartphones. From 1524 potential grants, we identified 397 that met the requisites of including an intervention app. Each grant's abstract was analyzed to understand the focus of intervention. The year of funding, type of activity (eg, R01, R34, and so on) and funding were noted.
We identified 13 categories of strategies employed in funded smartphone intervention apps. Most grants included either one (35.0%) or two (39.0%) intervention approaches. These included artificial intelligence (57 apps), bionic adaptation (33 apps), cognitive and behavioral therapies (68 apps), contingency management (24 apps), education and information (85 apps), enhanced motivation (50 apps), facilitating, reminding and referring (60 apps), gaming and gamification (52 apps), mindfulness training (18 apps), monitoring and feedback (192 apps), norm setting (7 apps), skills training (85 apps) and social support and social networking (59 apps). The most frequently observed grant types included Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) and Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR) grants (40.8%) and Research Project Grants (R01s) (26.2%). The number of grants funded increased through the five-year period from 60 in 2014 to 112 in 2018.
Smartphone intervention apps are increasingly competitive for NIH funding. They reflect a wide diversity of approaches that have significant potential for use in applied settings.
智能手机的广泛应用为研究人员开发、测试和实施干预措施提供了更多机会。美国国立卫生研究院 (NIH) 资助竞争性的、由研究员发起的资助申请。受资助的项目代表了科学的现状,因此预计能够预测未来不久的研究进展。
本文旨在分析 2014 年至 2018 年期间 NIH 资助的研究项目中基于智能手机的干预应用程序的种类。
我们查询了 NIH Reporter,以确定涉及移动健康和智能手机使用的候选资助项目。在 1524 个潜在的资助项目中,我们确定了 397 个符合包含干预应用程序要求的项目。分析每个项目的摘要,以了解干预的重点。记录项目的资助年份、活动类型(例如 R01、R34 等)和资助金额。
我们确定了资助的智能手机干预应用程序中使用的 13 种策略类别。大多数资助项目包含一种(35.0%)或两种(39.0%)干预方法。这些方法包括人工智能(57 个应用程序)、仿生适应(33 个应用程序)、认知和行为疗法(68 个应用程序)、条件管理(24 个应用程序)、教育和信息(85 个应用程序)、增强动机(50 个应用程序)、促进、提醒和推荐(60 个应用程序)、游戏和游戏化(52 个应用程序)、正念训练(18 个应用程序)、监测和反馈(192 个应用程序)、设定规范(7 个应用程序)、技能培训(85 个应用程序)和社会支持和社交网络(59 个应用程序)。最常见的资助项目类型包括小型企业创新研究(SBIR)和小型企业技术转让(STTR)项目(40.8%)和研究项目资助(R01)(26.2%)。在五年期间,资助的项目数量从 2014 年的 60 个增加到 2018 年的 112 个。
智能手机干预应用程序在 NIH 资助中越来越具有竞争力。它们反映了广泛的方法,具有在应用环境中广泛应用的潜力。