Brander Gustaf, Pérez-Vigil Ana, Larsson Henrik, Mataix-Cols David
Centre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Centre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016 Jun;65:36-62. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.03.011. Epub 2016 Mar 21.
To synthesize the current knowledge on possible environmental risk factors for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD).
We conducted a systematic review following PRISMA guidelines. The Embase, PubMed and Scopus databases were searched up until October 6, 2015, employing relevant keywords and MeSH terms.
128 studies met inclusion criteria. Potential environmental risk factors for OCD have been identified in the broad areas of perinatal complications, reproductive cycle, and stressful life events. There is limited evidence regarding other potential risk factors, such as parental age, season of birth, socioeconomic status, parental rearing practices, infections, traumatic brain injury, substance use or vitamin deficiency. In general, studies were of limited methodological quality.
At present, no environmental risk factors have convincingly been associated with OCD. We propose a roadmap for future studies, consisting of longitudinal, population-based research, employing quasi-experimental family and twin designs to identify risk factors that are not only associated with the disorder but also contribute to its causation either directly or moderating the effect of genes.
综合当前关于强迫症(OCD)可能的环境危险因素的知识。
我们按照PRISMA指南进行了系统评价。截至2015年10月6日,使用相关关键词和医学主题词(MeSH)检索了Embase、PubMed和Scopus数据库。
128项研究符合纳入标准。已在围产期并发症、生殖周期和生活应激事件等广泛领域确定了强迫症的潜在环境危险因素。关于其他潜在危险因素,如父母年龄、出生季节、社会经济地位、父母养育方式、感染、创伤性脑损伤、物质使用或维生素缺乏,证据有限。总体而言,研究的方法学质量有限。
目前,尚无环境危险因素被令人信服地证明与强迫症相关。我们提出了未来研究的路线图,包括基于人群的纵向研究,采用准实验性家庭和双生子设计,以识别不仅与该疾病相关,而且直接或通过调节基因效应导致其发病的危险因素。