• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

邮寄自我筛查工具评估法国老年人衰弱的灵敏度、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值。

Sensitivity, Specificity, Positive and Negative Predictive Values of a Postal Mail Self-Screening Tool for Frailty in French Older Adults.

机构信息

Jason Shourick, Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Public Health, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France, 11 rue Jean Mermoz, Faculté de Médecine, 37 allées Jules Guesde, 31 062 Toulouse Cedex 9, E-mail address:

出版信息

J Frailty Aging. 2023;12(3):175-181. doi: 10.14283/jfa.2023.11.

DOI:10.14283/jfa.2023.11
PMID:37493377
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9923634/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Frailty has emerged as one of the major risk factors of loss of autonomy and it can be reverted through early and appropriate interventions. A wide range of available frailty screening tools are administered, mainly in clinical settings. However, few frailty instruments are self-administered.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic test accuracy of a modified self-administered questionnaire derived from the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures (SOF) index against the Fried frailty phenotype in identifying frailty.

DESIGN

Observational, multicenter, diagnostic test accuracy study.

PARTICIPANTS

Participants aged 70 and over, living at home or in community-dwelling (n=5134) in two centers in France were contacted.

MEASUREMENTS

Participants were mailed self-administered questionnaires derived from the SOF index. Responders who accepted the home evaluation were assessed by trained nurses, blinded to results of the questionnaire, using the Fried frailty phenotype as the reference method.

RESULTS

The questionnaire was sent to 5134 participants, of which 1878 (36.6%) met inclusion criteria and returned the questionnaire. Fried frailty assessments were obtained in 691 (35.4%) participants. A total of 639 subjects had a complete evaluation on both the self-administered questionnaire and the Fried phenotype. Mean age was 78.9 (standard deviation [SD]: 5.95) years and 359 (56.2%) participants were women. According to the questionnaire, 159 (24.9%) subjects were considered frail, 172 (26.9%) pre-frail, and 308 (48.2) robust. With the home evaluation, Fried frailty phenotype results were respectively, 114 (17.8%), 295 (46.2%) and 230 (36%). The self-administered questionnaire presented a sensitivity of 66.6% (95% CI: 57.2-75.2) and a specificity of 84.2% (95% CI: 80.8-87.2).

CONCLUSIONS

A self-administered questionnaire can be used in elders and represents an opportunity for empowering them in the management of their health in the context of frailty.

摘要

背景

衰弱已成为丧失自主性的主要危险因素之一,通过早期和适当的干预可以逆转衰弱。目前有多种可用的衰弱筛查工具,主要在临床环境中使用。然而,很少有衰弱工具是自我管理的。

目的

本研究旨在确定源自骨质疏松性骨折研究(SOF)指数的改良自我管理问卷在识别衰弱方面对 Fried 衰弱表型的诊断测试准确性。

设计

观察性、多中心、诊断测试准确性研究。

参与者

联系了法国两个中心的 70 岁及以上、居住在家或社区的参与者(n=5134)。

测量

参与者通过邮寄收到源自 SOF 指数的自我管理问卷。接受家庭评估的应答者由经过培训的护士进行评估,评估人员对问卷结果不知情,使用 Fried 衰弱表型作为参考方法。

结果

问卷发送给了 5134 名参与者,其中 1878 名(36.6%)符合纳入标准并返回了问卷。在 691 名(35.4%)参与者中进行了 Fried 衰弱评估。共有 639 名参与者在自我管理问卷和 Fried 表型上都完成了完整评估。平均年龄为 78.9(标准差 [SD]:5.95)岁,359 名(56.2%)参与者为女性。根据问卷,159 名(24.9%)参与者被认为虚弱,172 名(26.9%)为虚弱前期,308 名(48.2%)为健壮。在家中进行评估时,Fried 衰弱表型的结果分别为 114 名(17.8%)、295 名(46.2%)和 230 名(36%)。自我管理问卷的敏感性为 66.6%(95% CI:57.2-75.2),特异性为 84.2%(95% CI:80.8-87.2)。

结论

自我管理问卷可用于老年人,为他们在衰弱管理中赋权提供了机会。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/760c/9923634/f04fc8eb3434/42415_2023_11_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/760c/9923634/f04fc8eb3434/42415_2023_11_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/760c/9923634/f04fc8eb3434/42415_2023_11_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Sensitivity, Specificity, Positive and Negative Predictive Values of a Postal Mail Self-Screening Tool for Frailty in French Older Adults.邮寄自我筛查工具评估法国老年人衰弱的灵敏度、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值。
J Frailty Aging. 2023;12(3):175-181. doi: 10.14283/jfa.2023.11.
2
A self-reported screening tool for detecting community-dwelling older persons with frailty syndrome in the absence of mobility disability: the FiND questionnaire.一种用于在无行动障碍情况下检测社区居住的患有衰弱综合征的老年人的自我报告筛查工具:FiND问卷。
PLoS One. 2014 Jul 7;9(7):e101745. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0101745. eCollection 2014.
3
Screening for frailty in older adults using a postal questionnaire: rationale, methods, and instruments validation of the INTER-FRAIL study.使用邮政问卷对老年人进行衰弱筛查:INTER-FRAIL研究的原理、方法及工具验证
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2014 Oct;62(10):1933-7. doi: 10.1111/jgs.13029. Epub 2014 Oct 3.
4
Feasibility, acceptability and diagnostic test accuracy of frailty screening instruments in community-dwelling older people within the Australian general practice setting: a study protocol for a cross-sectional study.澳大利亚全科医疗环境中社区居住老年人衰弱筛查工具的可行性、可接受性及诊断测试准确性:一项横断面研究的研究方案
BMJ Open. 2017 Aug 3;7(8):e016663. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016663.
5
Predicting risk and outcomes for frail older adults: an umbrella review of frailty screening tools.预测体弱老年人的风险和结局:衰弱筛查工具的综合评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2017 Apr;15(4):1154-1208. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-003018.
6
How to Manage Frail Older Adults in the Community? Proposal of a Health Promotion Program Experienced in a City of 16,638 Inhabitants in France.如何在社区管理体弱的老年人?法国一个拥有16638名居民的城市所实施的健康促进项目提案。
J Frailty Aging. 2018;7(2):120-126. doi: 10.14283/jfa.2017.47.
7
Postal screening can identify frailty and predict poor outcomes in older adults: longitudinal data from INTER-FRAIL study.邮政筛查可识别老年人的衰弱状况并预测不良结局:来自INTER-FRAIL研究的纵向数据
Age Ageing. 2016 Jul;45(4):469-74. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afw048. Epub 2016 Mar 23.
8
Development of a Fried Frailty Phenotype Questionnaire for Use in Screening Community-Dwelling Older Adults.中文译文:用于社区居住的老年人筛查的 Fried 衰弱表型问卷的开发。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020 Feb;21(2):272-276.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2019.07.015. Epub 2019 Sep 12.
9
Frailty Screening Tools for Elderly Patients Incident to Dialysis.老年透析患者衰弱筛查工具。
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017 Sep 7;12(9):1480-1488. doi: 10.2215/CJN.11801116. Epub 2017 Jul 17.
10
Feasibility and acceptability of commonly used screening instruments to identify frailty among community-dwelling older people: a mixed methods study.社区居住老年人中常用筛查工具识别虚弱的可行性和可接受性:一项混合方法研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2020 Apr 22;20(1):152. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-01551-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Post-Anesthesia Recovery: A Comprehensive Review of Sampe, Modified Aldrete, and White Scoring Systems.麻醉后恢复:对桑普、改良Aldrete和怀特评分系统的全面综述。
Cureus. 2024 Oct 6;16(10):e70935. doi: 10.7759/cureus.70935. eCollection 2024 Oct.
2
Global frailty screening tools: Review and application of frailty screening tools from 2001 to 2023.全球衰弱筛查工具:2001年至2023年衰弱筛查工具的综述与应用
Intractable Rare Dis Res. 2024 Feb;13(1):1-11. doi: 10.5582/irdr.2023.01113.
3
Implementation and Core Components of a Multimodal Program including Exercise and Nutrition in Prevention and Treatment of Frailty in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Narrative Review.

本文引用的文献

1
Screening for and Managing the Person with Frailty in Primary Care: ICFSR Consensus Guidelines.基层医疗中衰弱患者的筛查与管理:ICFSR 共识指南
J Nutr Health Aging. 2020;24(9):920-927. doi: 10.1007/s12603-020-1492-3.
2
Association of frailty with mortality in older inpatients with Covid-19: a cohort study.衰弱与 COVID-19 老年住院患者死亡率的关联:一项队列研究。
Age Ageing. 2020 Oct 23;49(6):915-922. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afaa184.
3
Diagnostic test accuracy of self-reported screening instruments in identifying frailty in community-dwelling older people: A systematic review.
多模式方案的实施和核心组成部分,包括运动和营养,用于预防和治疗社区居住的老年人虚弱:叙述性综述。
Nutrients. 2023 Sep 22;15(19):4100. doi: 10.3390/nu15194100.
社区居住老年人中自我报告的筛查工具在识别虚弱方面的诊断测试准确性:系统评价。
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2020 Jan;20(1):14-24. doi: 10.1111/ggi.13810. Epub 2019 Nov 14.
4
Physical Frailty: ICFSR International Clinical Practice Guidelines for Identification and Management.身体虚弱:ICFSR 国际临床实践指南,用于识别和管理。
J Nutr Health Aging. 2019;23(9):771-787. doi: 10.1007/s12603-019-1273-z.
5
Global Incidence of Frailty and Prefrailty Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.全球社区居住的老年人群中衰弱和衰弱前期的发病率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Aug 2;2(8):e198398. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.8398.
6
Increased healthcare costs associated with frailty among community-dwelling older people: A systematic review and meta-analysis.社区居住的老年人虚弱与医疗保健费用增加的关系:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2019 Sep-Oct;84:103898. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2019.06.003. Epub 2019 Jun 5.
7
Frailty index as a predictor of mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis.衰弱指数作为死亡率的预测指标:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Age Ageing. 2018 Mar 1;47(2):193-200. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afx162.
8
German translation, cross-cultural adaptation and diagnostic test accuracy of three frailty screening tools : PRISMA-7, FRAIL scale and Groningen Frailty Indicator.三种衰弱筛查工具的德语翻译、跨文化调适及诊断测试准确性:PRISMA-7、衰弱量表和格罗宁根衰弱指标
Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2018 Apr;51(3):282-292. doi: 10.1007/s00391-017-1295-2. Epub 2017 Aug 9.
9
Interventions to prevent or reduce the level of frailty in community-dwelling older adults: a scoping review of the literature and international policies.干预措施预防或降低社区居住的老年人衰弱水平:文献和国际政策的范围综述。
Age Ageing. 2017 May 1;46(3):383-392. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afw247.
10
Frailty and the Prediction of Negative Health Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis.衰弱与不良健康结局的预测:一项荟萃分析
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2016 Dec 1;17(12):1163.e1-1163.e17. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2016.09.010.