Allen Michael Todd, Miller Daniel P
School of Psychological Sciences, University of Northern ColoradoGreeley, CO, USA; Stress and Motivated Behavior InstituteSyracuse, NY, USA.
Stress and Motivated Behavior InstituteSyracuse, NY, USA; Program in Neuroscience, Carthage CollegeKenosha, WI, USA.
Front Behav Neurosci. 2016 Mar 10;10:39. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2016.00039. eCollection 2016.
Anxiety vulnerable individuals exhibit enhanced acquisition of conditioned eyeblinks as well as enhanced proactive interference from conditioned stimulus (CS) or unconditioned stimulus (US) alone pre-exposures (Holloway et al., 2012). US alone pre-exposures disrupt subsequent conditioned response (CR) acquisition to CS-US paired trials as compared to context pre-exposure controls. While Holloway et al. (2012) reported enhanced acquisition in high trait anxiety individuals in the context condition, anxiety vulnerability effects were not reported for the US alone pre-exposure group. It appears from the published data that there were no differences between high and low anxiety individuals in the US alone condition. In the work reported here, we sought to extend the findings of enhanced proactive interference with US alone pre-exposures to determine if the enhanced conditioning was disrupted by proactive interference procedures. We also were interested in the spontaneous eyeblinks during the pre-exposure phase of training. We categorized individuals as anxiety vulnerability or non-vulnerable individuals based scores on the Adult Measure of Behavioral Inhibition (AMBI). Sixty-six participants received 60 trials consisting of 30 US alone or context alone pre-exposures followed by 30 CS-US trials. US alone pre-exposures not only disrupted CR acquisition overall, but behaviorally inhibited (BI) individuals exhibited enhanced proactive interference as compared to non-inhibited (NI) individuals. In addition, US alone pre-exposures disrupted the enhanced acquisition observed in BI individuals as compared to NI individuals following context alone pre-exposures. Differences were also found in rates of spontaneous eyeblinks between BI and NI individuals during context pre-exposure. Our findings will be discussed in the light of the neural substrates of eyeblink conditioning as well as possible factors such as hypervigilance in the amygdala and hippocampal systems, and possible learned helplessness. Applications of these findings of enhanced proactive interference in BI individuals to pre-exposure therapies to reduce anxiety disorders such as posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) will be discussed.
焦虑易感性个体表现出条件性眨眼习得增强,以及单独的条件刺激(CS)或无条件刺激(US)预暴露所产生的增强的前摄干扰(霍洛韦等人,2012年)。与情境预暴露对照组相比,单独的US预暴露会破坏随后对CS-US配对试验的条件反应(CR)习得。虽然霍洛韦等人(2012年)报告了在情境条件下高特质焦虑个体的习得增强,但单独的US预暴露组未报告焦虑易感性效应。从已发表的数据来看,在单独的US条件下,高焦虑和低焦虑个体之间没有差异。在本文所报告的研究中,我们试图扩展单独的US预暴露增强前摄干扰的研究结果,以确定增强的条件作用是否会被前摄干扰程序破坏。我们还对训练预暴露阶段的自发眨眼感兴趣。我们根据成人行为抑制量表(AMBI)的得分将个体分为焦虑易感性个体或非易感性个体。66名参与者接受了60次试验,包括30次单独的US或单独的情境预暴露,随后是30次CS-US试验。单独的US预暴露不仅总体上破坏了CR习得,而且行为抑制(BI)个体与非抑制(NI)个体相比表现出增强的前摄干扰。此外,与单独的情境预暴露后的NI个体相比,单独的US预暴露破坏了BI个体中观察到的增强习得。在情境预暴露期间,BI个体和NI个体之间的自发眨眼率也存在差异。我们将根据眨眼条件作用的神经基质以及诸如杏仁核和海马系统中的过度警觉等可能因素以及可能的习得性无助来讨论我们的研究结果。将讨论这些在BI个体中增强的前摄干扰的研究结果在预暴露疗法中用于减少创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)等焦虑症的应用。