van Vugt Marieke K, Beulen Marijke A, Taatgen Niels A
Cognitive Modeling Group, Institute of Artificial Intelligence and Cognitive Engineering, University of Groningen Groningen, Netherlands.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 Mar 8;10:93. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00093. eCollection 2016.
Models of evidence accumulation have been very successful at describing human decision making behavior. Recent years have also seen the first reports of neural correlates of this accumulation process. However, these studies have mostly focused on perceptual decision making tasks, ignoring the role of additional cognitive processes like memory retrieval that are crucial in real-world decisions. In this study, we tried to find a neural signature of evidence accumulation during a recognition memory task. To do this, we applied a method we have successfully used to localize evidence accumulation in scalp EEG during a perceptual decision making task. This time, however, we applied it to intracranial EEG recordings, which provide a much higher spatial resolution. We identified several brain areas where activity ramps up over time, but these neural patterns do not appear to be modulated by behavioral variables such as the amount of available evidence or response time. This casts doubt on the idea of evidence accumulation as a general decision-making mechanism underlying different types of decisions.
证据积累模型在描述人类决策行为方面非常成功。近年来也首次出现了关于这一积累过程的神经关联的报道。然而,这些研究大多集中在感知决策任务上,忽略了诸如记忆检索等额外认知过程在现实世界决策中至关重要的作用。在本研究中,我们试图在识别记忆任务中找到证据积累的神经特征。为此,我们应用了一种我们已成功用于在感知决策任务中定位头皮脑电图中证据积累的方法。然而,这次我们将其应用于颅内脑电图记录,其提供了更高的空间分辨率。我们识别出了几个随着时间推移活动增强的脑区,但这些神经模式似乎并未受到诸如可用证据量或反应时间等行为变量的调节。这对证据积累作为不同类型决策背后的一般决策机制这一观点提出了质疑。