• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胜任力建模中拟议的核心胜任力及实证验证程序:确认与分类

Proposed Core Competencies and Empirical Validation Procedure in Competency Modeling: Confirmation and Classification.

作者信息

Baczyńska Anna K, Rowiński Tomasz, Cybis Natalia

机构信息

Management Department, Kozminski University Warsaw, Poland.

Institute of Psychology, Cardinal Stefan Wyszynski University in Warsaw Warsaw, Poland.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2016 Mar 8;7:273. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00273. eCollection 2016.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00273
PMID:27014111
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4781851/
Abstract

Competency models provide insight into key skills which are common to many positions in an organization. Moreover, there is a range of competencies that is used by many companies. Researchers have developed core competency terminology to underline their cross-organizational value. The article presents a theoretical model of core competencies consisting of two main higher-order competencies called performance and entrepreneurship. Each of them consists of three elements: the performance competency includes cooperation, organization of work and goal orientation, while entrepreneurship includes innovativeness, calculated risk-taking and pro-activeness. However, there is lack of empirical validation of competency concepts in organizations and this would seem crucial for obtaining reliable results from organizational research. We propose a two-step empirical validation procedure: (1) confirmation factor analysis, and (2) classification of employees. The sample consisted of 636 respondents (M = 44.5; SD = 15.1). Participants were administered a questionnaire developed for the study purpose. The reliability, measured by Cronbach's alpha, ranged from 0.60 to 0.83 for six scales. Next, we tested the model using a confirmatory factor analysis. The two separate, single models of performance and entrepreneurial orientations fit quite well to the data, while a complex model based on the two single concepts needs further research. In the classification of employees based on the two higher order competencies we obtained four main groups of employees. Their profiles relate to those found in the literature, including so-called niche finders and top performers. Some proposal for organizations is discussed.

摘要

能力模型有助于洞察一个组织中许多职位共有的关键技能。此外,还有一系列能力被许多公司所采用。研究人员已经开发出核心能力术语来强调其跨组织价值。本文提出了一个核心能力的理论模型,该模型由两个主要的高阶能力组成,即绩效和创业精神。其中每一个都由三个要素组成:绩效能力包括合作、工作组织和目标导向,而创业精神包括创新性、审慎冒险和主动性。然而,能力概念在组织中缺乏实证验证,而这对于从组织研究中获得可靠结果似乎至关重要。我们提出了一个两步实证验证程序:(1)验证性因素分析,以及(2)员工分类。样本由636名受访者组成(M = 44.5;SD = 15.1)。参与者接受了一份为该研究目的而编制的问卷。通过克朗巴哈系数测量的六个量表的信度范围为0.60至0.83。接下来,我们使用验证性因素分析对模型进行了测试。绩效和创业导向这两个单独的单一模型与数据拟合得相当好,而基于这两个单一概念的复杂模型则需要进一步研究。在基于这两个高阶能力对员工进行分类时,我们得到了四类主要员工。他们的概况与文献中发现的概况相关,包括所谓的利基发现者和顶尖表现者。文中还讨论了对组织的一些建议。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c68/4781851/92c50b1a9f5d/fpsyg-07-00273-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c68/4781851/f1b7a557a71e/fpsyg-07-00273-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c68/4781851/4d1cef05fcf8/fpsyg-07-00273-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c68/4781851/885b9c6d1399/fpsyg-07-00273-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c68/4781851/bfd96a314657/fpsyg-07-00273-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c68/4781851/573122847398/fpsyg-07-00273-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c68/4781851/c552952a26dd/fpsyg-07-00273-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c68/4781851/92c50b1a9f5d/fpsyg-07-00273-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c68/4781851/f1b7a557a71e/fpsyg-07-00273-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c68/4781851/4d1cef05fcf8/fpsyg-07-00273-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c68/4781851/885b9c6d1399/fpsyg-07-00273-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c68/4781851/bfd96a314657/fpsyg-07-00273-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c68/4781851/573122847398/fpsyg-07-00273-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c68/4781851/c552952a26dd/fpsyg-07-00273-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c68/4781851/92c50b1a9f5d/fpsyg-07-00273-g007.jpg

相似文献

1
Proposed Core Competencies and Empirical Validation Procedure in Competency Modeling: Confirmation and Classification.胜任力建模中拟议的核心胜任力及实证验证程序:确认与分类
Front Psychol. 2016 Mar 8;7:273. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00273. eCollection 2016.
2
Core competencies of the entrepreneurial leader in health care organizations.医疗保健组织中创业型领导者的核心能力。
Health Care Manag (Frederick). 2009 Jan-Mar;28(1):19-29. doi: 10.1097/HCM.0b013e318196de5c.
3
[Competency requirements for executives in healthcare and social services organizations: Results of a Delphi study].[医疗保健和社会服务组织管理人员的能力要求:德尔菲研究结果]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2018 Jul;134:35-41. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2018.01.007. Epub 2018 Feb 8.
4
Development and validation of health service management competencies.卫生服务管理能力的发展与验证
J Health Organ Manag. 2018 Apr 9;32(2):157-175. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-06-2017-0120. Epub 2018 Feb 8.
5
Construct validation of judgement-based assessments of medical trainees' competency in the workplace using a "Kanesian" approach to validation.采用“凯恩式”验证方法对基于判断的医学实习生职场能力评估进行结构效度验证。
BMC Med Educ. 2015 Dec 30;15:237. doi: 10.1186/s12909-015-0520-1.
6
Toward a Validated Competence Framework for Sustainable Entrepreneurship.迈向可持续创业的有效能力框架。
Organ Environ. 2018 Jun;31(2):113-132. doi: 10.1177/1086026617697039. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
7
Which competencies do health information managers working in public hospitals perceive to be important for effective performance?在公立医院工作的健康信息管理人员认为哪些能力对于有效履行职责很重要?
Health Inf Manag. 2002;30(1):20-39.
8
A Competency Model for Clinical Physicians in China: A Cross-Sectional Survey.中国临床医师胜任力模型:一项横断面调查
PLoS One. 2016 Dec 9;11(12):e0166252. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166252. eCollection 2016.
9
Paramedic Disaster Health Management Competencies: A Scoping Review.急救灾难卫生管理能力:范围综述。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2019 Jun;34(3):322-329. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X19004357. Epub 2019 May 28.
10
Core competency requirements among extension workers in peninsular Malaysia: Use of Borich's needs assessment model.马来西亚半岛推广人员的核心能力要求:使用博里奇需求评估模型。
Eval Program Plann. 2017 Jun;62:9-14. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2017.02.001. Epub 2017 Feb 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Developing the Workforce of the Digital Future: mHealth Competency and Fidelity Measurement in Community-Based Care.培养数字未来的劳动力:社区护理中的移动健康能力与保真度测量。
J Technol Behav Sci. 2024;9(1):35-45. doi: 10.1007/s41347-024-00385-y. Epub 2024 Jan 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Testing for multigroup equivalence of a measuring instrument: a walk through the process.测量工具的多组等效性检验:流程详解
Psicothema. 2008 Nov;20(4):872-82.
2
Strategy as simple rules.作为简单规则的策略。
Harv Bus Rev. 2001 Jan;79(1):106-16, 176.
3
Testing for competence rather than for "intelligence".测试能力而非“智力”。
Am Psychol. 1973 Jan;28(1):1-14. doi: 10.1037/h0034092.
4
Comparative fit indexes in structural models.结构模型中的比较拟合指数。
Psychol Bull. 1990 Mar;107(2):238-46. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238.
5
A reconsideration of testing for competence rather than for intelligence.
Am Psychol. 1991 Oct;46(10):1012-24. doi: 10.1037//0003-066x.46.10.1012.