Patel Mitesh S, Patel Neha, Small Dylan S, Rosin Roy, Rohrbach Jeffrey I, Stromberg Nathaniel, Hanson C William, Asch David A
Penn Medicine Center for Health Care Innovation, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Aug;31(8):863-70. doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3673-7. Epub 2016 Mar 25.
Changes in the medium of communication from paging to mobile secure text messaging may change clinical care, but the effects of these changes on patient outcomes have not been well examined.
To evaluate the association between inpatient medicine service adoption of mobile secure text messaging and patient length of stay and readmissions.
Observational study.
Patients admitted to medicine services at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania (intervention site; n = 8995 admissions of 6484 patients) and Penn Presbyterian Medical Center (control site; n = 6799 admissions of 4977 patients) between May 1, 2012, and April 30, 2014.
Mobile secure text messaging.
Change in length of stay and 30-day readmissions, comparing patients at the intervention site to the control site before (May 1, 2012 to April 30, 2013) and after (May 1, 2013 to April 30, 2014) the intervention, adjusting for time trends and patient demographics, comorbidities, insurance, and disposition.
During the pre-intervention period, the mean length of stay ranged from 4.0 to 5.0 days at the control site and from 5.2 to 6.7 days at the intervention site, but trends were similar. In the first month after the intervention, the mean length of stay was unchanged at the control site (4.7 to 4.7 days) but declined at the intervention site (6.0 to 5.4 days). Trends were mostly similar during the rest of the post-intervention period, ranging from 4.4 to 5.6 days at the control site and from 5.4 to 6.5 days at the intervention site. Readmission rates varied significantly within sites before and after the intervention, but overall trends were similar. In adjusted analyses, there was a significant decrease in length of stay for the intervention site relative to the control site during the post-intervention period compared to the pre-intervention period (-0.77 days ; 95 % CI, -1.14, -0.40; P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the odds of readmission (OR, 0.97; 95 % CI: 0.81, 1.17; P = 0.77). These findings were supported by multiple sensitivity analyses.
Compared to a control group over time, hospitalized medical patients on inpatient services whose care providers and staff were offered mobile secure text messaging showed a relative decrease in length of stay and no change in readmissions.
通信方式从传呼机转变为移动安全短信可能会改变临床护理,但这些变化对患者预后的影响尚未得到充分研究。
评估住院内科服务采用移动安全短信与患者住院时间和再入院率之间的关联。
观察性研究。
2012年5月1日至2014年4月30日期间,宾夕法尼亚大学医院(干预地点;6484例患者的8995次入院)和宾夕法尼亚长老会医疗中心(对照地点;4977例患者的6799次入院)内科服务收治的患者。
移动安全短信。
比较干预地点和对照地点在干预前(2012年5月1日至2013年4月30日)和干预后(2013年5月1日至2014年4月30日)患者的住院时间变化和30天再入院率,并对时间趋势、患者人口统计学特征、合并症、保险和出院情况进行调整。
在干预前期,对照地点的平均住院时间为4.0至5.0天,干预地点为5.2至6.7天,但趋势相似。在干预后的第一个月,对照地点的平均住院时间未变(4.7至4.7天),而干预地点有所下降(6.0至5.4天)。在干预后的其余时间里,趋势大多相似,对照地点为4.4至5.6天,干预地点为5.4至6.5天。干预前后各地点的再入院率差异显著,但总体趋势相似。在调整分析中,与干预前期相比,干预地点在干预后期的住院时间相对于对照地点显著缩短(-0.77天;95%置信区间,-1.14,-0.40;P<0.001)。再入院几率无显著差异(比值比,0.97;95%置信区间:0.81,1.17;P=0.77)。这些发现得到了多项敏感性分析的支持。
随着时间的推移,与对照组相比,为其医护人员提供移动安全短信的住院内科患者住院时间相对缩短,再入院率无变化。