Suppr超能文献

用于筛选抗HIV-1药物的TZM-bl假病毒检测三种定量方法的比较

Comparison of three quantification methods for the TZM-bl pseudovirus assay for screening of anti-HIV-1 agents.

作者信息

Xing Liying, Wang Shunyi, Hu Qin, Li Jingtao, Zeng Yi

机构信息

College of Life Science and Bioengineering, Beijing University of Technology, No. 100 Pingleyuan, Beijing 100124, PR China.

College of Life Science and Bioengineering, Beijing University of Technology, No. 100 Pingleyuan, Beijing 100124, PR China.

出版信息

J Virol Methods. 2016 Jul;233:56-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2016.03.008. Epub 2016 Mar 23.

Abstract

The TZM-bl pseudovirus assay is commonly used to evaluate the efficacy of neutralizing antibodies and small molecular inhibitors in HIV-1 research. Here, to determine the optimal measurement method for screening anti-HIV-1 inhibitors, we compared three measurement methods based on firefly luciferase and β-galactosidase activities. The 50% tissue culture infective doses (TCID50) of the pseudoviruses were determined using the luciferase, β-galactosidase colorimetric, and 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-β-D-galactopyranoside (X-gal) staining assays. Three commercial reverse-transcriptase inhibitors (azidothymidine, nevirapine, and lamivudine) were tested as reference drugs to compare the reproducibility, linear correlation, and half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) values determined using these methods. In the TCID50 assay, the sensitivity of β-galactosidase colorimetric assay was almost 562 times lower than that of the other two methods. Reproducible dose-response curves were obtained for the inhibitors with all methods; the IC50 values of the inhibitors were not significantly different. Linear regression analysis showed linear correlation between methods. Compared to the β-galactosidase colorimetric assay, the other two methods have the advantage of high sensitivity and are less affected by interference. In conclusion, the luciferase and X-gal staining assays, which can be applied either alone or combined, are recommended for anti-HIV-1 inhibitor screening.

摘要

TZM-bl 假病毒检测法常用于评估 HIV-1 研究中中和抗体和小分子抑制剂的功效。在此,为确定筛选抗 HIV-1 抑制剂的最佳测量方法,我们比较了基于萤火虫荧光素酶和 β-半乳糖苷酶活性的三种测量方法。使用荧光素酶、β-半乳糖苷酶比色法和 5-溴-4-氯-3-吲哚基-β-D-吡喃半乳糖苷(X-gal)染色法测定假病毒的 50%组织培养感染剂量(TCID50)。测试了三种市售逆转录酶抑制剂(叠氮胸苷、奈韦拉平和拉米夫定)作为参考药物,以比较使用这些方法测定的重现性、线性相关性和半数最大抑制浓度(IC50)值。在 TCID50 检测中,β-半乳糖苷酶比色法的灵敏度比其他两种方法低近 562 倍。所有方法均获得了抑制剂的可重现剂量反应曲线;抑制剂的 IC50 值无显著差异。线性回归分析表明各方法之间存在线性相关性。与 β-半乳糖苷酶比色法相比,其他两种方法具有灵敏度高且受干扰影响较小的优点。总之,推荐单独或联合应用荧光素酶和 X-gal 染色法进行抗 HIV-1 抑制剂筛选。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验