Population Services International, Washington, DC, USA.
Independent consultant, London, UK.
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2016 Mar 25;4(1):141-54. doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-15-00384. Print 2016 Mar.
Social franchising programs in low- and middle-income countries have tried using the standard wealth index, based on the Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) questionnaire, in client exit interviews to assess clients' relative wealth compared with the national wealth distribution to ensure equity in service delivery. The large number of survey questions required to capture the wealth index variables have proved cumbersome for programs.
Using an adaptation of the Delphi method, we developed shortened wealth indices and in February 2015 consulted 15 stakeholders in equity measurement. Together, we selected the best of 5 alternative indices, accompanied by 2 measures of agreement (percent agreement and Cohen's kappa statistic) comparing wealth quintile assignment in the new indices to the full DHS index. The panel agreed that reducing the number of assets was more important than standardization across countries because a short index would provide strong indication of client wealth and be easier to collect and use in the field. Additionally, the panel agreed that the simplified index should be highly correlated with the DHS for each country (kappa ≥ 0.75) for both national and urban-specific samples. We then revised indices for 16 countries and selected the minimum number of questions and question options required to achieve a kappa statistic ≥ 0.75 for both national and urban populations.
After combining the 5 wealth quintiles into 3 groups, which the expert panel deemed more programmatically meaningful, reliability between the standard DHS wealth index and each of 3 simplified indices was high (median kappa = 0.81, 086, and 0.77, respectively, for index B that included only the common questions from the DHS VI questionnaire, index D that included the common questions plus country-specific questions, and index E that found the shortest list of common and country-specific questions that met the minimum reliability criteria of kappa ≥ 0.75). Index E was the simplified index of choice because it was reliable in national and urban contexts while requiring the fewest number of survey questions-6 to 18 per country compared with 25 to 47 in the original DHS wealth index (a 66% average reduction).
Social franchise clinics and other types of service delivery programs that want to assess client wealth in relation to a national or urban population can do so with high reliability using a short questionnaire. Future uses of the simplified asset questionnaire include a mobile application for rapid data collection and analysis.
在中低收入国家,社会特许经营项目曾尝试在客户退出访谈中使用基于人口与健康调查(DHS)问卷的标准财富指数,以评估客户相对于国家财富分布的相对财富,从而确保服务提供的公平性。然而,为了捕获财富指数变量,需要大量的调查问题,这对于项目来说非常繁琐。
我们使用德尔菲法的改编版,开发了简化的财富指数,并于 2015 年 2 月咨询了 15 位公平性测量利益相关者。我们共同选择了 5 种替代指数中的最佳方案,并附有 2 种衡量协议的指标(百分比协议和 Cohen's kappa 统计量),用于比较新指数中财富五分位数的分配与完整 DHS 指数。专家组一致认为,减少资产数量比国家间的标准化更为重要,因为一个简短的指数将能够强有力地指示客户的财富状况,并且更易于在实地收集和使用。此外,专家组还一致认为,对于每个国家(kappa≥0.75),简化指数应与 DHS 高度相关,包括国家和城市特定样本。然后,我们为 16 个国家修订了指数,并选择了实现 kappa 统计量≥0.75 的国家和城市人口所需的最少问题数量和问题选项。
将 5 个财富五分位数合并为 3 组后,专家组认为这更具项目意义。标准 DHS 财富指数与 3 个简化指数之间的可靠性很高(分别为标准指数 B、包含 DHS VI 问卷中常见问题的指数 D 和满足最小可靠性标准的最短共同和国家特定问题列表的指数 E 的kappa 值分别为 0.81、0.86 和 0.77)。指数 E 是简化指数的首选,因为它在国家和城市背景下具有可靠性,同时所需的调查问题数量最少-每个国家 6 到 18 个问题,而原始 DHS 财富指数为 25 到 47 个问题(平均减少 66%)。
希望根据国家或城市人口评估客户财富的社会特许经营诊所和其他类型的服务提供项目可以使用简短的问卷进行评估,并且具有很高的可靠性。简化资产问卷的未来用途包括用于快速数据收集和分析的移动应用程序。