Suppr超能文献

手机调查方法是否重要?在中低收入国家,计算机辅助电话访谈和交互式语音应答非传染性疾病风险因素调查的可靠性。

Does mobile phone survey method matter? Reliability of computer-assisted telephone interviews and interactive voice response non-communicable diseases risk factor surveys in low and middle income countries.

机构信息

Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.

Department of Population, Family and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2019 Apr 10;14(4):e0214450. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214450. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Increased mobile phone subscribership in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) provides novel opportunities to track population health. The objective of this study was to examine reliability of data in comparing participant responses collected using two mobile phone survey (MPS) delivery modalities, computer assisted telephone interviews (CATI) and interactive voice response (IVR) in Bangladesh (BGD) and Tanzania (TZA).

METHODS

Using a cross-over design, we used random digit dialing (RDD) to call randomly generated mobile phone numbers and recruit survey participants to receive either a CATI or IVR survey on non-communicable disease (NCD) risk factors, followed 7 days later by the survey mode not received during first contact; either IVR or CATI. Respondents who received the first survey were designated as first contact (FC) and those who consented to being called a second time and subsequently answered the call were designated as follow-up (FU). We used the same questionnaire for both contacts, with response options modified to suit the delivery mode. Reliability of responses was analyzed using the Cohen's kappa statistic for percent agreement between two modes.

RESULTS

Self-reported data on demographic characteristics and NCD behavioral risk factors were collected from 482 (CATI-FC) and 653 (IVR-FC) age-eligible and consenting respondents in BGD, and from 387 (CATI-FC) and 674 (IVR-FC) respondents in TZA respectively. Survey follow-up rates were 30.7% (n = 482) for IVR-FU and 53.8% (n = 653) for CATI-FU in BGD; and 42.4% (n = 387) for IVR-FU and 49.9% (n = 674) for CATI-FU in TZA respectively. Overall, there was high consistency between delivery modalities for alcohol consumption in the past 30 days in both countries (kappa = 0.64 for CATI→IVR (BGD), kappa = 0.54 for IVR→CATI (BGD); kappa = 0.66 for CATI→IVR (TZA), kappa = 0.76 for IVR→CATI (TZA)), and current smoking (kappa = 0.68 for CATI→IVR (BGD), kappa = 0.69 for IVR→CATI (BGD); kappa = 0.39 for CATI→IVR (TZA), kappa = 0.50 for IVR→CATI (TZA)). There was moderate to substantial consistency in both countries for history of checking for hypertension and diabetes with kappa statistics ranging from 0.43 to 0.67. There was generally lower consistency in both countries for physical activity (vigorous and moderate) with kappa statistics ranging from 0.10 to 0.41, weekly fruit and vegetable with kappa ranging from 0.08 to 0.45, consumption of foods high in salt and efforts to limit salt with kappa generally below 0.3.

CONCLUSIONS

The study found that when respondents are re-interviewed, the reliability of answers to most demographic and NCD variables is similar whether starting with CATI or IVR. The study underscores the need for caution when selecting questions for mobile phone surveys. Careful design can help ensure clarity of questions to minimize cognitive burden for respondents, many of whom may not have prior experience in taking automated surveys. Further research should explore possible differences and determinants of survey reliability between delivery modes and ideally compare both IVR and CATI surveys to in-person face-to-face interviews. In addition, research is needed to better understand factors that influence survey cooperation, completion, refusal and attrition rates across populations and contexts.

摘要

简介

在中低收入国家(LMICs),移动电话用户数量的增加为跟踪人口健康状况提供了新的机会。本研究的目的是比较两种移动电话调查(MPS)交付方式,即计算机辅助电话访谈(CATI)和交互式语音应答(IVR),在孟加拉国(BGD)和坦桑尼亚(TZA)收集的参与者应答数据的可靠性。

方法

采用交叉设计,我们使用随机数字拨号(RDD)拨打随机生成的手机号码,并招募调查参与者接受非传染性疾病(NCD)风险因素的 CATI 或 IVR 调查,随后在第一次接触后 7 天接受未收到的调查模式;要么是 IVR,要么是 CATI。接受第一次调查的受访者被指定为第一接触者(FC),同意再次被呼叫并随后接听电话的受访者被指定为随访者(FU)。我们对两种接触方式使用了相同的问卷,通过适合交付模式的方式修改了回答选项。使用 Cohen's kappa 统计量分析两种模式之间的应答百分比一致性来评估应答的可靠性。

结果

分别从孟加拉国 482 名(CATI-FC)和 653 名(IVR-FC)符合年龄要求且同意的受访者和坦桑尼亚 387 名(CATI-FC)和 674 名(IVR-FC)受访者中收集了人口统计学特征和 NCD 行为风险因素的自我报告数据。调查随访率分别为 IVR-FU 的 30.7%(n = 482)和 CATI-FU 的 53.8%(n = 653),BGD;IVR-FU 的 42.4%(n = 387)和 CATI-FU 的 49.9%(n = 674),TZA 分别为。总的来说,在两国,酒精消费在过去 30 天内的两种交付方式之间存在高度一致性(CATI→IVR 的kappa 值为 0.64(BGD),kappa 值为 0.54(BGD);IVR→CATI 的 kappa 值为 0.66(BGD),kappa 值为 0.76(TZA))和当前吸烟(CATI→IVR 的 kappa 值为 0.68(BGD),kappa 值为 0.69(BGD);IVR→CATI 的 kappa 值为 0.39(TZA),kappa 值为 0.50(TZA))。两国的高血压和糖尿病检查史均具有中度至高度一致性,kappa 值范围为 0.43 至 0.67。两国的体力活动(剧烈和适度)一致性通常较低,kappa 值范围为 0.10 至 0.41,每周水果和蔬菜的 kappa 值范围为 0.08 至 0.45,高盐食品的消费和限制盐摄入量的努力,kappa 值通常低于 0.3。

结论

研究发现,当受访者被重新访谈时,无论从 CATI 还是 IVR 开始,大多数人口统计学和 NCD 变量的答案可靠性相似。该研究强调在为移动电话调查选择问题时需要谨慎。精心设计可以帮助确保问题的清晰度,最大限度地减少受访者的认知负担,其中许多人可能以前没有参加过自动化调查的经验。应进一步研究以探讨两种交付模式之间的调查可靠性差异和决定因素,并理想情况下将 IVR 和 CATI 调查与面对面访谈进行比较。此外,需要研究更好地了解人口和背景对调查合作、完成、拒绝和失访率的影响因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05d0/6457489/c66d211e8410/pone.0214450.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验