Suppr超能文献

12 个月多中心、随机对照研究比较左炔诺孕酮宫内节育系统与依托孕烯皮下埋植剂。

A 12-month multicenter, randomized study comparing the levonorgestrel intrauterine system with the etonogestrel subdermal implant.

机构信息

VL-Medi Clinical Research Center, Helsinki, Finland.

May Logan Centre, Bootle, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Fertil Steril. 2016 Jul;106(1):151-157.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.02.036. Epub 2016 Mar 24.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the levonorgestrel intrauterine system (LNG-IUS 8), which has an average levonorgestrel release rate of ∼8 μg/24 hours during the first year (total levonorgestrel content 13.5 mg; Jaydess/Skyla), with the etonogestrel (ENG) subdermal implant (total content, 68 mg) with regard to the 12-month discontinuation rate (primary outcome).

DESIGN

Randomized, open-label, phase III study.

SETTING

Thirty-eight centers in six European countries.

PATIENT(S): Study population of 766 healthy nulliparous and parous women aged 18-35 years.

INTERVENTION(S): The LNG-IUS 8 or the ENG implant.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Discontinuation rate, by treatment group, at Month 12.

RESULT(S): The 12-month discontinuation rates were 19.6% and 26.8% in the LNG-IUS 8 and ENG implant groups, respectively. The -7.2% difference was statistically significant (95% confidence interval -13.2%, -1.2%). Fewer women in the LNG-IUS 8 group than in the ENG implant group discontinued because of increased bleeding (3.2% vs. 11.3%) or adverse events (14.3% vs. 21.8%). At 12 months, more women in the LNG-IUS 8 group than in the ENG implant group were "very/somewhat satisfied" with their bleeding pattern (60.9% vs. 33.6%) and reported a preference to use their study treatment after study completion (70.1% vs. 58.5%).

CONCLUSION(S): The LNG-IUS 8 was associated with a significantly lower 12-month discontinuation rate compared with the ENG implant; mainly because ENG implant users frequently discontinued due to increased bleeding. More LNG-IUS 8 users than ENG implant users reported being "very/somewhat satisfied" with their bleeding pattern, and reported a preference to continue using their study treatment after the study.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT01397097.

摘要

目的

比较左炔诺孕酮宫内节育系统(LNG-IUS 8)和依托孕烯皮下埋植剂(ENG 埋植剂)的 12 个月停药率(主要结局)。LNG-IUS 8 头 1 年的平均左炔诺孕酮释放率约为 8μg/24 小时(左炔诺孕酮总含量 13.5mg;杰依戴/Skyla),ENG 埋植剂总含量 68mg。

设计

随机、开放标签、III 期研究。

地点

欧洲六个国家的 38 个中心。

患者

纳入研究的 766 例健康未产妇和经产妇年龄 18-35 岁。

干预措施

LNG-IUS 8 或 ENG 埋植剂。

主要结局测量指标

治疗 12 个月时的停药率,按治疗组分析。

结果

LNG-IUS 8 组和 ENG 埋植剂组的 12 个月停药率分别为 19.6%和 26.8%。LNG-IUS 8 组比 ENG 埋植剂组的差异为-7.2%(95%置信区间为-13.2%,-1.2%),有统计学意义。LNG-IUS 8 组因出血增多(3.2% vs. 11.3%)或不良事件(14.3% vs. 21.8%)而停药的女性少于 ENG 埋植剂组。治疗 12 个月时,LNG-IUS 8 组比 ENG 埋植剂组更多的女性对其出血模式“非常/有些满意”(60.9% vs. 33.6%),并表示在研究结束后更愿意继续使用其研究治疗(70.1% vs. 58.5%)。

结论

LNG-IUS 8 的 12 个月停药率明显低于 ENG 埋植剂;主要原因是 ENG 埋植剂使用者常因出血增多而停药。与 ENG 埋植剂使用者相比,更多的 LNG-IUS 8 使用者报告对其出血模式“非常/有些满意”,并表示在研究结束后更愿意继续使用其研究治疗。

临床试验注册号

NCT01397097。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验