Koppel Sjaan, Charlton Judith L, Langford Jim, Di Stefano Marilyn, MacDonald Wendy, Vlahodimitrakou Zafiroula, Mazer Barbara L, Gelinas Isabelle, Vrkljan Brenda, Eliasz Kinga, Myers Anita, Tuokko Holly A, Marshall Shawn C
Monash University Accident Research Centre, Monash University.
La Trobe University.
Can J Aging. 2016 Jun;35 Suppl 1:15-31. doi: 10.1017/S0714980816000015. Epub 2016 Mar 29.
This study examined a cohort of 227 older drivers and investigated the relationship between performance on the electronic Driver Observation Schedule (eDOS) driving task and: (1) driver characteristics; (2) functional abilities; (3) perceptions of driving comfort and abilities; and (4) self-reported driving restrictions. Participants (male: 70%; age: M = 81.53 years, SD = 3.37 years) completed a series of functional ability measures and scales on perceived driving comfort, abilities, and driving restrictions from the Year 2 Candrive/Ozcandrive assessment protocol, along with an eDOS driving task. Observations of participants' driving behaviours during the driving task were recorded for intersection negotiation, lane-changing, merging, low-speed maneuvers, and maneuver-free driving. eDOS driving task scores were high (M = 94.74; SD = 5.70) and significantly related to participants' perceived driving abilities, reported frequency of driving in challenging situations, and number of driving restrictions. Future analyses will explore potential changes in driving task scores over time.
本研究对227名老年驾驶员进行了调查,探讨了电子驾驶员观察量表(eDOS)驾驶任务表现与以下因素之间的关系:(1)驾驶员特征;(2)功能能力;(3)对驾驶舒适度和能力的认知;(4)自我报告的驾驶限制。参与者(男性占70%;年龄:M = 81.53岁,标准差 = 3.37岁)完成了一系列功能能力测量以及来自第二年Candrive/Ozcandrive评估协议的关于驾驶舒适度、能力和驾驶限制的量表,同时还完成了一项eDOS驾驶任务。在驾驶任务期间,记录了参与者在交叉路口通行、变道、汇入车流、低速操控和无操控驾驶时的驾驶行为观察情况。eDOS驾驶任务得分较高(M = 94.74;标准差 = 5.70),且与参与者的自我感知驾驶能力、报告的在具有挑战性情况下的驾驶频率以及驾驶限制数量显著相关。未来的分析将探讨驾驶任务得分随时间的潜在变化。