Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont., Canada.
Accid Anal Prev. 2013 Dec;61:288-95. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.03.030. Epub 2013 Mar 30.
The objective of the present study was to examine the relationship between cognitive performance, driver perceptions and self-reported driving restrictions. A cross-sectional analysis was conducted on baseline data from Candrive II, a five-year prospective cohort study of 928 older drivers aged 70-94 years from seven cities. Cognitive performance was assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) as well as the Trail Making Test, parts A and B. Driver perceptions were assessed using the Day and Night Driving Comfort Scales and the Perceived Driving Abilities scale, while driving practices were captured by the Situational Driving Frequency and Avoidance scales, as well as the Driving Habits and Intentions Questionnaire. The baseline data indicates this cohort is largely a cognitively intact group. Univariate regression analysis showed that longer Trails A and B completion times were significantly, but only modestly associated with reduced driving frequency and perceived driving abilities and comfort, as well as a significant tendency to avoid more difficult driving situations (all p<.05). Most of these associations persisted after adjusting for age and sex, as well as indicators of health, vision, mood and physical functioning. Exceptions were Trails A and B completion times and situational driving frequency, as well as time to complete Trails B and current driving restrictions. After adjusting for the confounding factors, the total MoCA score was not associated with any of the driving measure scores while the number of errors on Trails A was significantly associated only with situational driving frequency and number of errors on Trails B was significantly associated only with situational driving avoidance. Prospective follow-up will permit examination of whether baseline cognition or changes in cognition are associated with changes in driver perceptions, actual driving restrictions and on-road driving outcomes (e.g., crashes, violations) over time.
本研究旨在探讨认知表现、驾驶员认知与自我报告驾驶限制之间的关系。这是一项针对 Candrive II 研究的基线数据的横断面分析,该研究是一项为期五年的前瞻性队列研究,共纳入来自七个城市的 928 名 70-94 岁的老年驾驶员。认知表现使用蒙特利尔认知评估量表(MoCA)以及连线测试 A 和 B 进行评估。驾驶员认知使用日间和夜间驾驶舒适度量表以及感知驾驶能力量表进行评估,而驾驶行为则通过情境驾驶频率和回避量表以及驾驶习惯和意图问卷进行评估。基线数据表明,该队列主要是一个认知完整的群体。单变量回归分析显示,连线测试 A 和 B 的完成时间延长与驾驶频率降低、感知驾驶能力和舒适度降低以及回避更困难驾驶情况的趋势显著相关(均 P<.05)。这些关联在调整年龄、性别以及健康、视力、情绪和身体功能指标后仍然存在。例外的是连线测试 A 和 B 的完成时间以及情境驾驶频率,以及完成连线测试 B 的时间和当前的驾驶限制。在调整混杂因素后,MoCA 总分与任何驾驶测量评分均无关,而连线测试 A 的错误数仅与情境驾驶频率显著相关,连线测试 B 的错误数仅与情境驾驶回避显著相关。前瞻性随访将允许检查基线认知或认知变化是否与驾驶员认知、实际驾驶限制以及随时间推移的道路驾驶结果(例如,事故、违规)的变化相关。