Colleran Heidi
Institute for Advanced Study in Toulouse, 21 allee de Brienne, Toulouse 30151, France
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2016 Apr 19;371(1692):20150152. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0152.
Cultural evolutionists have long been interested in the problem of why fertility declines as populations develop. By outlining plausible mechanistic links between individual decision-making, information flow in populations and competition between groups, models of cultural evolution offer a novel and powerful approach for integrating multiple levels of explanation of fertility transitions. However, only a modest number of models have been published. Their assumptions often differ from those in other evolutionary approaches to social behaviour, but their empirical predictions are often similar. Here I offer the first overview of cultural evolutionary research on demographic transition, critically compare it with approaches taken by other evolutionary researchers, identify gaps and overlaps, and highlight parallel debates in demography. I suggest that researchers divide their labour between three distinct phases of fertility decline--the origin, spread and maintenance of low fertility--each of which may be driven by different causal processes, at different scales, requiring different theoretical and empirical tools. A comparative, multi-level and mechanistic framework is essential for elucidating both the evolved aspects of our psychology that govern reproductive decision-making, and the social, ecological and cultural contingencies that precipitate and sustain fertility decline.
长期以来,文化进化学家一直对随着人口发展生育率下降这一问题很感兴趣。通过概述个体决策、群体中的信息流以及群体间竞争之间看似合理的机制联系,文化进化模型为整合生育率转变的多层次解释提供了一种新颖且强大的方法。然而,已发表的模型数量并不多。它们的假设往往与其他社会行为进化方法不同,但其实证预测往往相似。在此,我首次概述了关于人口转变的文化进化研究,批判性地将其与其他进化研究者采用的方法进行比较,识别差距与重叠之处,并突出人口学中的平行争论。我建议研究人员在生育率下降的三个不同阶段——低生育率的起源、传播和维持——之间进行分工,每个阶段可能由不同的因果过程驱动,在不同规模上,需要不同的理论和实证工具。一个比较、多层次且具有机制性的框架对于阐明我们心理中支配生殖决策的进化方面,以及促成并维持生育率下降的社会、生态和文化偶然性至关重要。