• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用髌腱与腘绳肌腱对隧道进行解剖定位的前交叉韧带重建的比较研究。

COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ACL RECONSTRUCTION WITH ANATOMICAL POSITIONING OF THE TUNNELS USING THE PATELLAR TENDON VERSUS HAMSTRING TENDON.

作者信息

de Pádua Vitor Barion Castro, Maldonado Hilário, Vilela Júlio César Rodrigues, Provenza Alexandre Ribeira, Monteiro Cleverson, de Oliveira Neto Heleno Cavalcante

机构信息

Lecturer in Orthopedics at the School of Medicine, University of Marília (UNIMAR), Marília, SP, Brazil.

Titular Professor of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Marília Medical School (FAMEMA), Marília, SP, Brazil.

出版信息

Rev Bras Ortop. 2015 Nov 16;47(1):50-6. doi: 10.1016/S2255-4971(15)30345-1. eCollection 2012 Jan-Feb.

DOI:10.1016/S2255-4971(15)30345-1
PMID:27027082
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4799339/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare ACL reconstruction with anatomical positioning of the tunnels using the hamstring or patellar tendons.

METHODS

We prospectively evaluated 52 patients who underwent ACL reconstruction using the Chambat's technique, with anatomical positioning of the tunnels drilled outside in. They were divided into group A, with 27 patients, using the patellar tendon as a graft, and group B, with 25 patients, using the hamstring.

RESULTS

In group A 26 patients were very satisfied or satisfied and 1 unhappy, in group B. 25 patients were very satisfied or satisfied with the procedure (p = 0.990). According to the Lysholm scale, group A had a mean score of 96.11 and group B, 95.32 (p=0.594). In relation to preoperative IKDC, 100% of the patients in group A and 92% of those in group B were IKDC C or D (p = 0.221); in the assessment with a minimum of two-year follow-up, 96% of group A and 92% of group B were IKDC A or B (p = 0.256). The Lachman test, pivot shift, return to sports activities, and the comparative difference in anterior translation (Rolimeter(TM)) also showed no statistically significant difference. In group A, 5 patients (18.5%) were unable to kneel on a hard surface, whereas no patient in group B had this complaint.

CONCLUSION

The anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction presents similar results using the hamstring or patellar tendon with anatomical positioning of the tunnels. Drilling the femoral tunnel outside in is a reproducible and accurate option in the correct placement the femoral tunnel.

摘要

目的

比较使用腘绳肌腱或髌腱进行隧道解剖定位的前交叉韧带重建术。

方法

我们前瞻性评估了52例行前交叉韧带重建术的患者,采用Chambat技术,从外向内进行隧道的解剖定位。他们被分为A组,共27例患者,使用髌腱作为移植物;B组,共25例患者,使用腘绳肌腱。

结果

A组中26例患者非常满意或满意,1例不满意;B组中25例患者对手术非常满意或满意(p = 0.990)。根据Lysholm评分,A组平均得分为96.11,B组为95.32(p = 0.594)。关于术前国际膝关节文献委员会(IKDC)评分,A组100%的患者和B组92%的患者为IKDC C或D级(p = 0.221);在至少两年随访的评估中,A组96%的患者和B组92%的患者为IKDC A或B级(p = 0.256)。Lachman试验、轴移试验、恢复体育活动情况以及前向平移的比较差异(Rolimeter™)也均无统计学显著差异。A组中有5例患者(18.5%)无法在硬地面上跪,而B组中无患者有此主诉。

结论

采用腘绳肌腱或髌腱并进行隧道解剖定位的前交叉韧带重建术结果相似。从外向内钻股骨隧道在正确放置股骨隧道方面是一种可重复且准确的选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0fc/4799339/c73584e8977b/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0fc/4799339/db5346506d17/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0fc/4799339/9b35ade9ef3c/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0fc/4799339/12db2db19a65/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0fc/4799339/c73584e8977b/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0fc/4799339/db5346506d17/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0fc/4799339/9b35ade9ef3c/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0fc/4799339/12db2db19a65/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0fc/4799339/c73584e8977b/gr4.jpg

相似文献

1
COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ACL RECONSTRUCTION WITH ANATOMICAL POSITIONING OF THE TUNNELS USING THE PATELLAR TENDON VERSUS HAMSTRING TENDON.使用髌腱与腘绳肌腱对隧道进行解剖定位的前交叉韧带重建的比较研究。
Rev Bras Ortop. 2015 Nov 16;47(1):50-6. doi: 10.1016/S2255-4971(15)30345-1. eCollection 2012 Jan-Feb.
2
[Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: comparison of patellar bone-tendon-bone and hamstring tendon graft methods. Part 2. Short-term evaluation of the hamstring tendon graft technique with use of the Rigidfix system].[前交叉韧带重建:髌腱-骨和腘绳肌腱移植方法的比较。第2部分。使用Rigidfix系统对腘绳肌腱移植技术的短期评估]
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2005;72(4):239-45.
3
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Outcomes for Quadriceps Tendon Autograft Versus Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone and Hamstring-Tendon Autografts.前交叉韧带重建:股四头肌肌腱自体移植物与骨-髌腱-骨和腘绳肌腱自体移植物的结果的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Sports Med. 2019 Dec;47(14):3531-3540. doi: 10.1177/0363546518825340. Epub 2019 Feb 21.
4
Graft selection in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction for smoking patients.前交叉韧带重建术中对吸烟患者移植物的选择。
Am J Sports Med. 2014 Jan;42(1):166-72. doi: 10.1177/0363546513505191. Epub 2013 Oct 10.
5
A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Patellar Tendon, Hamstring Tendon, and Double-Bundle ACL Reconstructions: Patient-Reported and Clinical Outcomes at 5-Year Follow-up.随机对照临床试验比较髌腱、腘绳肌腱和双束 ACL 重建:5 年随访时的患者报告和临床结果。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019 Jun 5;101(11):949-960. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.18.01322.
6
Hamstring Autograft versus Patellar Tendon Autograft for ACL Reconstruction: Is There a Difference in Graft Failure Rate? A Meta-analysis of 47,613 Patients.用于前交叉韧带重建的腘绳肌自体移植与髌腱自体移植:移植物失败率有差异吗?对47613例患者的荟萃分析
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Oct;475(10):2459-2468. doi: 10.1007/s11999-017-5278-9.
7
Hamstring tendon versus patellar tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using biodegradable interference fit fixation: a prospective matched-group analysis.使用可生物降解的干涉配合固定进行腘绳肌腱与髌腱前交叉韧带重建:一项前瞻性配对组分析。
Am J Sports Med. 2005 Sep;33(9):1327-36. doi: 10.1177/0363546504273488. Epub 2005 Jul 7.
8
Bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft could be recommended as a superior graft to hamstring autograft for ACL reconstruction in patients with generalized joint laxity: 2- and 5-year follow-up study.骨-髌腱-骨自体移植物可作为一种优于腘绳肌自体移植物的移植物,用于治疗全身性关节松弛患者的 ACL 重建:2 年和 5 年随访研究。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018 Sep;26(9):2568-2579. doi: 10.1007/s00167-018-4881-y. Epub 2018 Mar 3.
9
A meta-analysis of bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft versus four-strand hamstring tendon autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.髌腱骨自体移植与四股绳肌肌腱自体移植用于前交叉韧带重建的荟萃分析。
Knee. 2015 Mar;22(2):100-10. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2014.11.014. Epub 2014 Dec 11.
10
Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament in females: A comparison of hamstring versus patellar tendon autograft.女性前交叉韧带重建:腘绳肌自体移植与髌腱自体移植的比较
Arthroscopy. 2002 Jan;18(1):46-54. doi: 10.1053/jars.2002.25974.

引用本文的文献

1
Incidence of Meniscal Ramp Lesion in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstructions.前交叉韧带重建术中半月板斜裂损伤的发生率
Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo). 2022 Jan 20;57(3):422-428. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1735942. eCollection 2022 Jun.
2
Passive anterior tibia translation in anterior cruciate ligament-injured, anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed and healthy knees: a systematic review.前交叉韧带损伤、前交叉韧带重建及健康膝关节的被动胫骨前移:一项系统评价
Musculoskelet Surg. 2019 Aug;103(2):121-130. doi: 10.1007/s12306-018-0572-6. Epub 2018 Oct 16.
3
Saphenous nerve injury during harvesting of one or two hamstring tendons for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

本文引用的文献

1
Anatomic single-bundle ACL reconstruction.解剖单束前交叉韧带重建术。
Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 2009 Dec;17(4):247-51. doi: 10.1097/JSA.0b013e3181c0ccf8.
2
Anatomical and nonanatomical double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: importance of femoral tunnel location on knee kinematics.解剖学和非解剖学双束前交叉韧带重建:股骨隧道位置对膝关节运动学的重要性。
Am J Sports Med. 2008 Apr;36(4):678-85. doi: 10.1177/0363546508314414. Epub 2008 Feb 22.
3
Osseous landmarks of the femoral attachment of the anterior cruciate ligament: an anatomic study.
在获取一条或两条腘绳肌腱用于前交叉韧带重建过程中隐神经损伤。
Rev Bras Ortop. 2015 Aug 29;50(5):546-9. doi: 10.1016/j.rboe.2015.08.007. eCollection 2015 Sep-Oct.
前交叉韧带股骨附着点的骨性标志:一项解剖学研究。
Arthroscopy. 2007 Nov;23(11):1218-25. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2007.09.008.
4
Current techniques in anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.解剖学前交叉韧带重建的当前技术
Arthroscopy. 2007 Sep;23(9):938-47. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2007.04.009.
5
Overlapping systematic reviews of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction comparing hamstring autograft with bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft: why are they different?比较腘绳肌自体移植物与髌腱-骨自体移植物的前交叉韧带重建的重叠系统评价:为何它们有所不同?
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Jul;89(7):1542-52. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.01292.
6
A 10-year comparison of anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions with hamstring tendon and patellar tendon autograft: a controlled, prospective trial.腘绳肌腱与髌腱自体移植重建前交叉韧带的10年对照前瞻性试验比较
Am J Sports Med. 2007 Apr;35(4):564-74. doi: 10.1177/0363546506296042. Epub 2007 Jan 29.
7
Anatomic double bundle: a new concept in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the quadriceps tendon.解剖双束:使用股四头肌腱进行前交叉韧带重建的新概念。
Arthroscopy. 2006 Nov;22(11):1249.e1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2006.07.042.
8
A prospective comparison of bone-patellar tendon-bone and hamstring tendon grafts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in male patients.男性患者前交叉韧带重建中骨-髌腱-骨与腘绳肌腱移植的前瞻性比较
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2007 Feb;15(2):115-25. doi: 10.1007/s00167-006-0165-z. Epub 2006 Sep 9.
9
Comparison between different femoral fixation devices for ACL reconstruction with doubled hamstring tendon graft: a biomechanical analysis.双股绳肌腱移植重建前交叉韧带时不同股骨固定装置的比较:生物力学分析
Arthroscopy. 2006 Jun;22(6):660-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2006.04.082.
10
Bone-patellar tendon-bone autografts versus hamstring autografts for reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligament: meta-analysis.用于前交叉韧带重建的骨-髌腱-骨自体移植物与腘绳肌自体移植物对比:荟萃分析
BMJ. 2006 Apr 29;332(7548):995-1001. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38784.384109.2F. Epub 2006 Apr 7.