NIHR School for Primary Care Research, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.
BMJ. 2013 Feb 26;346:f540. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f540.
To assess how initial severity of depression affects the benefit derived from low intensity interventions for depression.
Meta-analysis of individual patient data from 16 datasets comparing low intensity interventions with usual care.
Primary care and community settings.
2470 patients with depression.
Low intensity interventions for depression (such as guided self help by means of written materials and limited professional support, and internet delivered interventions).
Depression outcomes (measured with the Beck Depression Inventory or Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale), and the effect of initial depression severity on the effects of low intensity interventions.
Although patients were referred for low intensity interventions, many had moderate to severe depression at baseline. We found a significant interaction between baseline severity and treatment effect (coefficient -0.1 (95% CI -0.19 to -0.002)), suggesting that patients who are more severely depressed at baseline demonstrate larger treatment effects than those who are less severely depressed. However, the magnitude of the interaction (equivalent to an additional drop of around one point on the Beck Depression Inventory for a one standard deviation increase in initial severity) was small and may not be clinically significant.
The data suggest that patients with more severe depression at baseline show at least as much clinical benefit from low intensity interventions as less severely depressed patients and could usefully be offered these interventions as part of a stepped care model.
评估抑郁初始严重程度如何影响从低强度干预中获得的抑郁获益。
对 16 个数据集的个体患者数据进行荟萃分析,比较低强度干预与常规护理。
初级保健和社区环境。
2470 名抑郁症患者。
抑郁的低强度干预(如通过书面材料和有限的专业支持进行的指导自助,以及互联网提供的干预)。
抑郁结局(用贝克抑郁量表或流行病学研究中心抑郁量表测量),以及初始抑郁严重程度对低强度干预效果的影响。
尽管患者被转诊接受低强度干预,但许多患者在基线时有中度至重度抑郁。我们发现基线严重程度与治疗效果之间存在显著交互作用(系数为-0.1(95%置信区间-0.19 至-0.002)),这表明基线时抑郁程度越严重的患者,治疗效果越大。然而,交互作用的幅度(相当于初始严重程度增加一个标准差时贝克抑郁量表的额外下降约一个点)较小,可能没有临床意义。
数据表明,基线时抑郁程度更严重的患者从低强度干预中获得的临床获益至少与抑郁程度较轻的患者一样多,他们可以作为阶梯式护理模式的一部分,从中受益。