• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肺栓塞患者全身溶栓与导管溶栓的比较。

Comparison between systemic and catheter thrombolysis in patients with pulmonary embolism.

作者信息

Yoo Jung-Wan, Choi Ho Cheol, Lee Seung Jun, Cho Yu Ji, Lee Jong Deog, Kim Ho Cheol

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Jinju, Gyeonsangnam-do, Republic of Korea.

Department of Radiology, College of Medicine, Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Jinju, Gyeongsangnam-do, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Am J Emerg Med. 2016 Jun;34(6):985-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2016.02.037. Epub 2016 Feb 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajem.2016.02.037
PMID:27033736
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although systemic thrombolysis (ST) or catheter-directed therapy (CDT) is performed in patients with acute massive or submassive pulmonary embolism (PE), clinical data comparing between both therapies remain limited. We compared clinical outcomes between ST and CDT in patients with acute massive and submassive PE.

METHODS

From January 2005 to June 2015, clinical outcomes of patients with acute massive or submassive PE receiving ST or CDT were evaluated and compared retrospectively.

RESULTS

Of 72 patients, 44 were treated with ST; and 28, with CDT. The mean age was 63.9 ± 17 years old. The proportion of male sex was higher in patients receiving CDT compared to that with ST (46.4% vs 20.5%; P = .02). Half of patients presented with massive PE, and cardiac arrest occurred in 11 patients (15.3%). No difference was observed between the 2 groups with respect to 7-day mortality (13.6% in ST vs 10.7% in CDT), inhospital mortality (13.6% in ST vs 14.3% in CDT), and major bleeding complication (16.7% in ST vs 16.7% in CDT). Cardiac arrest (odds ratio, 6.286; 95% confidence interval, 1.081-36.555; P = .041) was associated with 14-day mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Similar clinical outcomes were shown between ST and CDT in patients with acute massive or submassive PE.

摘要

背景

尽管急性大面积或次大面积肺栓塞(PE)患者会接受全身溶栓治疗(ST)或导管定向治疗(CDT),但比较这两种治疗方法的临床数据仍然有限。我们比较了急性大面积和次大面积PE患者接受ST和CDT后的临床结局。

方法

回顾性评估并比较2005年1月至2015年6月接受ST或CDT治疗的急性大面积或次大面积PE患者的临床结局。

结果

72例患者中,44例接受ST治疗,28例接受CDT治疗。平均年龄为63.9±17岁。接受CDT治疗的患者中男性比例高于接受ST治疗的患者(46.4%对20.5%;P = 0.02)。一半的患者表现为大面积PE,11例患者(15.3%)发生心脏骤停。两组在7天死亡率(ST组为13.6%,CDT组为10.7%)、住院死亡率(ST组为13.6%,CDT组为14.3%)和严重出血并发症(ST组为16.7%,CDT组为16.7%)方面未观察到差异。心脏骤停(优势比,6.286;95%置信区间,1.081 - 36.555;P = 0.041)与第14天死亡率相关。

结论

急性大面积或次大面积PE患者接受ST和CDT后的临床结局相似。

相似文献

1
Comparison between systemic and catheter thrombolysis in patients with pulmonary embolism.肺栓塞患者全身溶栓与导管溶栓的比较。
Am J Emerg Med. 2016 Jun;34(6):985-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2016.02.037. Epub 2016 Feb 15.
2
Catheter-directed thrombolysis versus suction thrombectomy in the management of acute pulmonary embolism.经导管溶栓与血栓抽吸治疗急性肺栓塞的比较。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2019 Sep;7(5):623-628. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2018.10.025. Epub 2019 Mar 20.
3
Comparative Outcomes of Ultrasound-Assisted Thrombolysis and Standard Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis in the Treatment of Acute Pulmonary Embolism.超声辅助溶栓与标准导管定向溶栓治疗急性肺栓塞的比较结果
Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2016 Aug;50(6):405-10. doi: 10.1177/1538574416666228.
4
Utilization of catheter-directed thrombolysis in pulmonary embolism and outcome difference between systemic thrombolysis and catheter-directed thrombolysis.导管定向溶栓在肺栓塞中的应用以及全身溶栓与导管定向溶栓之间的疗效差异。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Dec 1;86(7):1219-27. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26108. Epub 2015 Aug 26.
5
Comparison of percutaneous ultrasound-accelerated thrombolysis versus catheter-directed thrombolysis in patients with acute massive pulmonary embolism.急性大面积肺栓塞患者经皮超声加速溶栓与导管直接溶栓的比较
Vascular. 2009 Nov-Dec;17 Suppl 3:S137-47. doi: 10.2310/6670.2009.00063.
6
Ultrasound-Assisted Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis for Submassive Pulmonary Embolism.超声辅助导管定向溶栓治疗亚大面积肺栓塞
Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2018 Apr;52(3):195-201. doi: 10.1177/1538574418757400. Epub 2018 Feb 13.
7
A meta-analysis of outcomes of catheter-directed thrombolysis for high- and intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism.高、中危肺栓塞导管溶栓治疗结局的荟萃分析。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2018 Jul;6(4):530-540. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2018.03.010.
8
Short Duration Catheter-directed Thrombolysis for Acute Pulmonary Embolism Rapidly Improves Acute Cardiac Function.急性肺栓塞短时间导管溶栓迅速改善急性心功能。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2021 Apr;72:373-382. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2020.09.064. Epub 2020 Nov 21.
9
Outcomes of catheter-directed versus systemic thrombolysis for the treatment of pulmonary embolism: A real-world analysis of national administrative claims.导管定向溶栓与全身溶栓治疗肺栓塞的结局比较:国家行政索赔的真实世界分析。
Vasc Med. 2020 Aug;25(4):334-340. doi: 10.1177/1358863X20903371. Epub 2020 Apr 27.
10
Systemic Thrombolysis, Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis, and Anticoagulation for Intermediate-risk Pulmonary Embolism: A Simulation Modeling Analysis.全身溶栓、导管定向溶栓及抗凝治疗中危肺栓塞:一项模拟建模分析
Acad Emerg Med. 2017 Oct;24(10):1235-1243. doi: 10.1111/acem.13242. Epub 2017 Sep 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Outcomes of catheter-directed thrombolysis versus systemic thrombolysis in the treatment of pulmonary embolism: a meta-analysis.导管定向溶栓与全身溶栓治疗肺栓塞的疗效比较:一项荟萃分析。
J Geriatr Cardiol. 2023 Jun 28;20(6):459-468. doi: 10.26599/1671-5411.2023.06.005.
2
Catheter-directed thrombolysis compared with systemic thrombolysis and anticoagulation in patients with intermediate- or high-risk pulmonary embolism: systematic review and network meta-analysis.经导管溶栓治疗与全身溶栓治疗和抗凝治疗中高危肺栓塞患者的比较:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
CMAJ. 2023 Jun 19;195(24):E833-E843. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.220960.
3
An Update on the Management of Acute High-Risk Pulmonary Embolism.
急性高危肺栓塞管理的最新进展
J Clin Med. 2022 Aug 17;11(16):4807. doi: 10.3390/jcm11164807.
4
Catheter-Based Therapies Decrease Mortality in Patients With Intermediate and High-Risk Pulmonary Embolism: Evidence From Meta-Analysis of 65,589 Patients.基于导管的治疗可降低中高危肺栓塞患者的死亡率:来自对65589例患者的荟萃分析证据
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Jun 16;9:861307. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.861307. eCollection 2022.
5
Catheter directed compared to systemically delivered thrombolysis for pulmonary embolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis.导管定向溶栓与全身溶栓治疗肺栓塞的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2022 Feb;53(2):454-466. doi: 10.1007/s11239-021-02556-7. Epub 2021 Aug 31.
6
Role of Pulmonary Embolism Response Team in patients with intermediate- and high-risk pulmonary embolism: a concise review and preliminary experience from China.肺栓塞反应小组在中高危肺栓塞患者中的作用:中国的简要综述与初步经验
J Geriatr Cardiol. 2020 Aug;17(8):510-518. doi: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2020.08.005.
7
Catheter-directed therapy for acute pulmonary embolism: navigating gaps in the evidence.急性肺栓塞的导管定向治疗:探寻证据空白
Eur Heart J Suppl. 2019 Nov;21(Suppl I):I23-I30. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/suz224. Epub 2019 Nov 21.
8
Immediate and late impact of reperfusion therapies in acute pulmonary embolism.再灌注治疗对急性肺栓塞的即刻和晚期影响
Eur Heart J Suppl. 2019 Nov;21(Suppl I):I1-I13. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/suz222. Epub 2019 Nov 21.
9
Is there an optimal "door to cath time" in the treatment of acute pulmonary embolism with catheter-directed thrombolysis?在导管直接溶栓治疗急性肺栓塞中是否存在最佳的“入院至导管溶栓时间”?
Ann Transl Med. 2019 Sep;7(17):419. doi: 10.21037/atm.2019.07.89.
10
Thrombosis.血栓形成
Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2017 Dec;7(Suppl 3):S131-S133. doi: 10.21037/cdt.2017.11.08.