Suppr超能文献

便携式眼压计:压平式与压陷式眼压计的临床比较

Portable tonometers: a clinical comparison of applanation and indentation devices.

作者信息

Chiara G F, Semes L P, Potter J W, Cutter G R, Tucker W R

机构信息

Optometry Service, Veterans Administration Outpatient Clinic, Las Vegas, NV 89102.

出版信息

J Am Optom Assoc. 1989 Feb;60(2):105-10.

PMID:2703651
Abstract

Optometric services to outpatient clinics, nursing homes and hospitals require portable equipment for ocular assessment. Of the various tonometric methods available, Goldmann applanation tonometry remains the standard. We present a clinical comparison of the hand-held version of Goldmann's instrument (Perkins tonometer) and the less expensive Schiotz tonometer. In a clinical comparison, we measured the intraocular pressure (IOP) of 51 inpatient and outpatient veterans (100 eyes) during routine examination. In each case the Perkins applanation tonometer was used first. This measurement was followed by IOP measurements using the Schiotz indentation tonometer with the 7.5 g and 5.5 g plunger loads. Plunger loads were alternated so that each was used, initially, 50% of the time. Good correlations, ranging from +.85 to +.68, were achieved between the applanation and indentation modes. Compact portability, lower cost and comparable reliability make the Schiotz tonometer a viable option for IOP screening.

摘要

为门诊诊所、疗养院和医院提供验光服务需要用于眼部评估的便携式设备。在现有的各种眼压测量方法中,Goldmann压平眼压测量法仍然是标准方法。我们对Goldmann仪器的手持式版本(Perkins眼压计)和价格较低的Schiotz眼压计进行了临床比较。在一项临床比较中,我们在常规检查期间测量了51名住院和门诊退伍军人(100只眼睛)的眼压(IOP)。在每种情况下,首先使用Perkins压平眼压计进行测量。随后使用Schiotz压陷眼压计,分别采用7.5g和5.5g的砝码负载测量眼压。砝码负载交替使用,使得每种负载最初使用的时间占总时间的50%。压平式和压陷式测量模式之间的相关性良好,范围从 +.85 到 +.68。Schiotz眼压计因其紧凑便携、成本较低且可靠性相当,成为眼压筛查的一个可行选择。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验