Schuler Andrée, Ferentzy Peter, Turner Nigel E, Skinner Wayne, McIsaac Kathryn E, Ziegler Carolyn P, Matheson Flora I
Centre for Research on Inner City Health, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
J Gambl Stud. 2016 Dec;32(4):1261-1278. doi: 10.1007/s10899-016-9596-8.
Given the preponderance of Gamblers Anonymous (GA), there has been relatively little effort to explore the existing evidence base on its effectiveness as a recovery approach for problem gambling. To remedy this gap in the literature we conducted a scoping review of the literature on mutual aid for individuals experiencing problem gambling published between 2002 and 2015. We searched 13 databases and reviewed reference lists and websites of relevant organizations. We reviewed records for eligibility and extracted relevant data from eligible articles. Three reviewers independently assessed the methodological quality of the included studies using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. We identified 17 studies in 25 publications that were eligible for inclusion. Most studies were conducted in the United States, were cross-sectional in design, and involved both male and female adult participants. Results indicate that the evidence for the effectiveness of GA either as a control condition or in conjunction with formal treatment or medication is inconsistent. An emphasis on patience, using the Serenity Prayer as a way to gain acceptance of financial matters and reality, and absolute assertion of identity as a "compulsive gambler" were identified as important aspects of GA's recovery culture. There is a need for large-scale randomized controlled trials to determine GA's effectiveness, as well as research exploring the mechanisms through which GA works, barriers to GA as a recovery approach, and the status of women in the fellowship.
鉴于匿名戒赌会(GA)的主导地位,相对而言,人们很少努力去探究关于其作为问题赌博康复方法有效性的现有证据基础。为弥补文献中的这一空白,我们对2002年至2015年间发表的关于为有问题赌博经历的个人提供互助的文献进行了范围综述。我们检索了13个数据库,并查阅了相关组织的参考文献列表和网站。我们审查记录的合格性,并从合格文章中提取相关数据。三位评审员使用混合方法评估工具独立评估纳入研究的方法学质量。我们在25篇出版物中确定了17项符合纳入条件的研究。大多数研究在美国进行,设计为横断面研究,涉及成年男性和女性参与者。结果表明,关于GA作为对照条件或与正式治疗或药物联合使用的有效性的证据并不一致。强调耐心、使用宁静祷文作为接受财务事项和现实的一种方式,以及绝对宣称自己是“强迫性赌徒”被确定为GA康复文化的重要方面。需要进行大规模随机对照试验来确定GA的有效性,以及探索GA起作用的机制、GA作为康复方法的障碍以及女性在该团体中的地位的研究。