Samoudi Amine M, Vermeeren Gunter, Tanghe Emmeric, Van Holen Roel, Martens Luc, Josephs Wout
Department of Information Technology (INTEC), Ghent University/iMinds, iGent, Ghent, Belgium.
Electronics and Information Systems (ELIS), Ghent University/iMinds, Ghent, Belgium.
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2016 Nov;44(5):1360-1367. doi: 10.1002/jmri.25257. Epub 2016 Apr 4.
To determine exposure to gradient switching fields of adults and children in a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanner by evaluating internal electric fields within realistic models of adult male, adult female, and child inside transverse and longitudinal gradient coils, and to compare these results with compliance guidelines.
Patients inside x-, y-, and z-gradient coils were simulated using anatomically realistic models of adult male, adult female, and child. The induced electric fields were computed for 1 kHz sinusoidal current with a magnitude of 1 A in the gradient coils. Rheobase electric fields were then calculated and compared to the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) 2004 and International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) 2010 guidelines. The effect of the human body, coil type, and skin conductivity on the induced electric field was also investigated.
The internal electric fields are within the first level controlled operating mode of the guidelines and range from 2.7V m to 4.5V m , except for the adult male inside the y-gradient coil (induced field reaches 5.4V m ).The induced electric field is sensitive to the coil type (electric field in the skin of adult male: 4V m , 4.6V m , and 3.8V m for x-, y-, and z-gradient coils, respectively), the human body model (electric field in the skin inside y-gradient coil: 4.6V m , 4.2V m , and 3V m for adult male, adult female, and child, respectively), and the skin conductivity (electric field 2.35-4.29% higher for 0.1S m skin conductivity compared to 0.2S m ).
The y-gradient coil induced the largest fields in the patients. The highest levels of internal electric fields occurred for the adult male model. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2016;44:1360-1367.
通过评估横向和纵向梯度线圈内成年男性、成年女性和儿童的真实模型中的内部电场,确定磁共振成像(MRI)扫描仪中成人和儿童对梯度切换场的暴露情况,并将这些结果与合规指南进行比较。
使用成年男性、成年女性和儿童的解剖学真实模型模拟x、y和z梯度线圈内的患者。计算梯度线圈中1 kHz正弦电流幅值为1 A时的感应电场。然后计算基强度电场,并与国际非电离辐射防护委员会(ICNIRP)2004年和国际电工委员会(IEC)2010年指南进行比较。还研究了人体、线圈类型和皮肤电导率对感应电场的影响。
除y梯度线圈内的成年男性(感应场达到5.4V/m)外,内部电场在指南的一级受控操作模式范围内,范围为2.7V/m至4.5V/m。感应电场对线圈类型(成年男性皮肤中的电场:x、y和z梯度线圈分别为4V/m、4.6V/m和3.8V/m)、人体模型(y梯度线圈内皮肤中的电场:成年男性、成年女性和儿童分别为并与国际电工委员会(IEC)2010年指南进行比较。还研究了人体、线圈类型和皮肤电导率对感应电场的影响。
除y梯度线圈内的成年男性(感应场达到5.4V/m)外)、人体模型(y梯度线圈内皮肤中的电场:成年男性、成年女性和儿童分别为4.6V/m、4.2V/m和3V/m)和皮肤电导率(皮肤电导率为0.1S/m时的电场比0.2S/m时高2.35 - 4.29%)敏感。
y梯度线圈在患者体内感应出的场最大。成年男性模型的内部电场水平最高。《磁共振成像杂志》2016年;44:1360 - 1367。