• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在第三个参保期,医保市场扩大决策支持工具以帮助消费者。

For Third Enrollment Period, Marketplaces Expand Decision Support Tools To Assist Consumers.

作者信息

Wong Charlene A, Polsky Daniel E, Jones Arthur T, Weiner Janet, Town Robert J, Baker Tom

机构信息

Charlene A. Wong (

Daniel E. Polsky is a professor of medicine, the Robert D. Eilers Professor in Health Care Management, and executive director of the Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, all at the University of Pennsylvania.

出版信息

Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 Apr;35(4):680-7. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1637.

DOI:10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1637
PMID:27044969
Abstract

The design of the Affordable Care Act's online health insurance Marketplaces can improve how consumers make complex health plan choices. We examined the choice environment on the state-based Marketplaces and HealthCare.gov in the third open enrollment period. Compared to previous enrollment periods, we found greater adoption of some decision support tools, such as total cost estimators and integrated provider lookups. Total cost estimators differed in how they generated estimates: In some Marketplaces, consumers categorized their own utilization, while in others, consumers answered detailed questions and were assigned a utilization profile. The tools available before creating an account (in the window-shopping period) and afterward (in the real-shopping period) differed in several Marketplaces. For example, five Marketplaces provided total cost estimators to window shoppers, but only two provided them to real shoppers. Further research is needed on the impact of different choice environments and on which tools are most effective in helping consumers pick optimal plans.

摘要

《平价医疗法案》在线医疗保险市场的设计可以改善消费者做出复杂健康计划选择的方式。我们研究了第三个开放注册期基于州的市场和医保网站的选择环境。与之前的注册期相比,我们发现一些决策支持工具,如总成本估算器和综合提供商查找工具的采用率更高。总成本估算器生成估算的方式有所不同:在一些市场中,消费者对自己的使用情况进行分类,而在另一些市场中,消费者回答详细问题并被分配一个使用情况概况。在几个市场中,创建账户之前(在浏览期)和之后(在实际购物期)可用的工具有所不同。例如,五个市场向浏览者提供总成本估算器,但只有两个市场向实际购物者提供。需要进一步研究不同选择环境的影响以及哪些工具在帮助消费者选择最佳计划方面最有效。

相似文献

1
For Third Enrollment Period, Marketplaces Expand Decision Support Tools To Assist Consumers.在第三个参保期,医保市场扩大决策支持工具以帮助消费者。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 Apr;35(4):680-7. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1637.
2
Efforts to Support Consumer Enrollment Decisions Using Total Cost Estimators: Lessons from the Affordable Care Act’s Marketplaces.利用总成本估算器支持消费者参保决策的努力:来自《平价医疗法案》市场的经验教训。
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2017 Feb;3:1-12.
3
Shopping on the Public and Private Health Insurance Marketplaces: Consumer Decision Aids and Plan Presentation.在公共和私人医疗保险市场购物:消费者决策辅助工具和计划介绍。
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Aug;33(8):1400-1410. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4483-x. Epub 2018 May 29.
4
Factors Affecting Health Insurance Enrollment Through the State Marketplaces: Observations on the ACA's Third Open Enrollment Period.影响通过州医保市场进行医疗保险参保的因素:对《平价医疗法案》第三个开放参保期的观察
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2016 Jul;19:1-12.
5
What states are doing to simplify health plan choice in the insurance marketplaces.各州在保险市场中为简化健康计划选择所采取的措施。
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2013 Dec;34:1-13.
6
Shifting the open enrollment period for ACA Marketplaces could increase enrollment and improve plan choices.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2014 Jul;33(7):1286-93. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0007.
7
Are Americans finding affordable coverage in the health insurance marketplaces? Results from the Commonwealth Fund Affordable Care Act Tracking Survey.美国人在医疗保险市场上能找到负担得起的保险范围吗?联邦基金《平价医疗法案》跟踪调查结果。
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2014 Sep;25:1-15.
8
Secret Shoppers Find Access To Providers And Network Accuracy Lacking For Those In Marketplace And Commercial Plans.暗访人员发现,对于参加市场医保计划和商业医保计划的人群而言,在联系医疗服务提供者以及医保网络准确性方面存在不足。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 Jul 1;35(7):1160-6. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1554.
9
An Early Look At SHOP Marketplaces: Low Premiums, Adequate Plan Choice In Many, But Not All, States.早期观察SHOP市场:保费较低,在许多(但并非所有)州有足够的保险计划选择。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2015 May;34(5):732-40. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.1370.
10
Decision-Making Experiences Of Consumers Choosing Individual-Market Health Insurance Plans.消费者选择个体医疗保险计划的决策体验。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2019 Mar;38(3):464-472. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05036.

引用本文的文献

1
"Pick a Plan and Roll the Dice": A qualitative study of consumer experiences selecting a health plan in the non-group market.“选择一个方案并掷骰子”:一项关于非团体市场中消费者选择健康保险方案经历的定性研究
Health Policy Open. 2023 Dec 2;5:100112. doi: 10.1016/j.hpopen.2023.100112. eCollection 2023 Dec 15.
2
High Deductible Health Plans and Use of Free Preventive Services Under the Affordable Care Act.高免赔额健康计划与平价医疗法案下免费预防服务的使用。
Inquiry. 2023 Jan-Dec;60:469580231182512. doi: 10.1177/00469580231182512.
3
Discussing Cost and Value in Patient Decision Aids and Shared Decision Making: A Call to Action.
探讨患者决策辅助工具和共同决策中的成本与价值:行动呼吁。
MDM Policy Pract. 2023 Jan 10;8(1):23814683221148651. doi: 10.1177/23814683221148651. eCollection 2023 Jan-Jun.
4
Informed Decision-making for Health Insurance Enrollment: Survey Study.健康保险参保的知情决策:调查研究
JMIR Form Res. 2021 Aug 12;5(8):e27477. doi: 10.2196/27477.
5
Poor Consumer Comprehension and Plan Selection Inconsistencies Under the 2016 HealthCare.gov Choice Architecture.2016年医保市场选择架构下消费者理解不足与计划选择不一致的问题
MDM Policy Pract. 2017 Jan-Jun;2(1). doi: 10.1177/2381468317716441. Epub 2017 Jun 28.
6
Shopping on the Public and Private Health Insurance Marketplaces: Consumer Decision Aids and Plan Presentation.在公共和私人医疗保险市场购物:消费者决策辅助工具和计划介绍。
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Aug;33(8):1400-1410. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4483-x. Epub 2018 May 29.
7
Show Me My Health Plans: Using a Decision Aid to Improve Decisions in the Federal Health Insurance Marketplace.向我展示我的健康保险计划:使用决策辅助工具改善联邦医疗保险市场中的决策。
MDM Policy Pract. 2016 Jul;1(1). doi: 10.1177/2381468316679998. Epub 2016 Nov 16.
8
Stakeholders' perceptions of ways to support decisions about health insurance marketplace enrollment: a qualitative study.利益相关者对支持医疗保险市场参保决策方式的看法:一项定性研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Nov 8;16(1):634. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1890-8.