DeMazumder Deeptankar, Limpitikul Worawan B, Dorante Miguel, Dey Swati, Mukhopadhyay Bhasha, Zhang Yiyi, Moorman J Randall, Cheng Alan, Berger Ronald D, Guallar Eliseo, Jones Steven R, Tomaselli Gordon F
Division of Cardiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 720 North Rutland Avenue, Ross 844, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
Division of Cardiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 720 North Rutland Avenue, Ross 844, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Europace. 2016 Dec;18(12):1818-1828. doi: 10.1093/europace/euv399. Epub 2016 Apr 4.
The need for a readily available, inexpensive, non-invasive method for improved risk stratification of heart failure (HF) patients is paramount. Prior studies have proposed that distinct fluctuation patterns underlying the variability of physiological signals have unique prognostic value. We tested this hypothesis in an extensively phenotyped cohort of HF patients using EntropyX, a novel non-linear measure of cardiac repolarization dynamics.
In a prospective, multicentre, observational study of 852 patients in sinus rhythm undergoing clinically indicated primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation (2003-10), exposures included demographics, history, physical examination, medications, laboratory results, serum biomarkers, ejection fraction, conventional electrocardiographic (ECG) analyses of heart rate and QT variability, and EntropyX. The primary outcome was first 'appropriate' ICD shock for ventricular arrhythmias. The secondary outcome was composite events (appropriate ICD shock and all-cause mortality). After exclusions, the cohort (n = 816) had a mean age of 60 ± 13 years, 28% women, 36% African Americans, 56% ischaemic cardiomyopathy, and 29 ± 16% Seattle HF risk score (SHFS) 5-year predicted mortality. Over 45 ± 24 months, there were 134 appropriate shocks and 166 deaths. After adjusting for 30 exposures, the hazard ratios (comparing the 5th to 1st quintile of EntropyX) for primary and secondary outcomes were 3.29 (95% CI 1.74-6.21) and 2.28 (1.53-3.41), respectively. Addition of EntropyX to a model comprised of the exposures or SHFS significantly increased net reclassification and the ROC curve area.
EntropyX measured during ICD implantation strongly and independently predicts appropriate shock and all-cause mortality over follow-up. EntropyX complements conventional risk predictors and has the potential for broad clinical application.
迫切需要一种现成的、廉价的、非侵入性方法来改善心力衰竭(HF)患者的风险分层。先前的研究表明,生理信号变异性背后的不同波动模式具有独特的预后价值。我们使用EntropyX(一种心脏复极动力学的新型非线性测量方法)在一个广泛表型的HF患者队列中验证了这一假设。
在一项对852例窦性心律患者进行临床指征的一级预防植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)植入的前瞻性、多中心观察性研究中(2003 - 2010年),暴露因素包括人口统计学、病史、体格检查、药物治疗、实验室检查结果、血清生物标志物、射血分数、心率和QT变异性的传统心电图(ECG)分析以及EntropyX。主要结局是首次因室性心律失常进行的“适当”ICD电击。次要结局是复合事件(适当的ICD电击和全因死亡率)。排除后,该队列(n = 816)的平均年龄为60±13岁,女性占28%,非裔美国人占36%,缺血性心肌病占56%,西雅图心力衰竭风险评分(SHFS)5年预测死亡率为29±16%。在45±24个月的时间里,有134次适当电击和166例死亡。在对30个暴露因素进行调整后,主要和次要结局的风险比(比较EntropyX的第5个五分位数与第1个五分位数)分别为3.29(95%CI 1.74 - 6.21)和2.28(1.53 - 3.41)。将EntropyX添加到由暴露因素或SHFS组成的模型中,显著增加了净重新分类和ROC曲线面积。
ICD植入期间测量的EntropyX能强有力且独立地预测随访期间的适当电击和全因死亡率。EntropyX补充了传统风险预测指标,具有广泛临床应用的潜力。