Lunghi Claudia, Morrone Maria Concetta, Secci Jacopo, Caputo Roberto
Department of Translational Research on New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy 2Institute of Neuroscience, CNR, Pisa, Italy.
Department of Translational Research on New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy 3Scientific Institute Stella Maris (IRCSS), Calambrone (Pisa), Italy.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016 Apr;57(4):1537-46. doi: 10.1167/iovs.15-18419.
Recent studies on adults have shown that short-term monocular deprivation boosts the deprived eye signal in binocular rivalry, reflecting homeostatic plasticity. Here we investigate whether homeostatic plasticity is present also during occlusion therapy for moderate amblyopia.
Binocular rivalry and visual acuity (using Snellen charts for children) were measured in 10 children (mean age 6.2 ± 1 years) with moderate anisometropic amblyopia before the beginning of treatment and at four intervals during occlusion therapy (2 hours, 1, 2, and 5 months). Visual stimuli were orthogonal gratings presented dichoptically through ferromagnetic goggles and children reported verbally visual rivalrous perception. Bangerter filters were applied on the spectacle lens over the best eye for occlusion therapy.
Two hours of occlusion therapy increased the nonamblyopic eye predominance over the amblyopic eye compared with pretreatment measurements, consistent with the results in adults. The boost of the nonamblyopic eye was still present after 1 month of treatment, steadily decreasing afterward to reach pretreatment levels after 2 months of continuous occlusion. Across subjects, the increase in nonamblyopic eye predominance observed after 2 hours of occlusion correlated (rho = -0.65, P = 0.04) with the visual acuity improvement of the amblyopic eye measured after 2 months of treatment.
Homeostatic plasticity operates during occlusion therapy for moderate amblyopia and the increase in nonamblyopic eye dominance observed at the beginning of treatment correlates with the amblyopic eye recovery rate. These results suggest that binocular rivalry might be used to monitor visual cortical plasticity during occlusion therapy, although further investigations on larger clinical populations are needed to validate the predictive power of the technique.
近期针对成年人的研究表明,短期单眼剥夺可增强双眼竞争中被剥夺眼的信号,这反映了稳态可塑性。在此,我们探究在中度弱视的遮盖治疗过程中是否也存在稳态可塑性。
对10名患有中度屈光参差性弱视的儿童(平均年龄6.2±1岁)在治疗开始前以及遮盖治疗期间的四个时间点(2小时、1个月、2个月和5个月)测量双眼竞争和视力(儿童使用斯内伦视力表)。视觉刺激为通过铁磁护目镜双眼分别呈现的正交光栅,儿童口头报告视觉竞争感知。在最佳矫正眼的眼镜镜片上应用班格特滤光片进行遮盖治疗。
与治疗前测量结果相比,2小时的遮盖治疗增加了非弱视眼相对于弱视眼的优势,这与成年人的结果一致。治疗1个月后非弱视眼的增强效应仍然存在,之后逐渐下降,在持续遮盖2个月后达到治疗前水平。在所有受试者中,遮盖2小时后观察到的非弱视眼优势增加与治疗2个月后测量的弱视眼视力改善相关(rho = -0.65,P = 0.04)。
稳态可塑性在中度弱视的遮盖治疗过程中起作用,治疗开始时观察到的非弱视眼优势增加与弱视眼的恢复率相关。这些结果表明,双眼竞争可用于监测遮盖治疗期间的视觉皮层可塑性,尽管需要对更大的临床群体进行进一步研究以验证该技术的预测能力。