Felmingham Kim L, Stewart Laura F, Kemp Andrew H, Carr Andrea R
Discipline of Psychology, School of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia.
Discipline of Psychology, School of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia.
Biol Psychol. 2016 May;117:179-186. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2016.04.001. Epub 2016 Apr 6.
A cognitive model of social anxiety predicts that an early attentional bias leads to greater cognitive processing of social threat signals, whereas the vigilance-avoidance model predicts there will be subsequent reduction in cognitive processing. This study tests these models by examining neural responses to social threat stimuli using Event-related potentials (ERP). 19 women with high trait social anxiety and 19 women with low trait social anxiety viewed emotional expressions (angry, disgusted, happy and neutral) in a passive viewing task whilst ERP responses were recorded. The HSA group revealed greater automatic attention, or hypervigilance, to all facial expressions, as indexed by greater N1 amplitude compared to the LSA group. They also showed greater sustained attention and elaborative processing of all facial expressions, indexed by significantly increased P2 and P3 amplitudes compared to the LSA group. These results support cognitive models of social anxiety, but are not consistent with predictions of the vigilance-avoidance model.
社交焦虑的一种认知模型预测,早期的注意偏向会导致对社交威胁信号进行更多的认知加工,而警觉-回避模型则预测随后的认知加工会减少。本研究通过使用事件相关电位(ERP)来检测对社交威胁刺激的神经反应,对这些模型进行了测试。19名高特质社交焦虑女性和19名低特质社交焦虑女性在一项被动观看任务中观看情绪表情(愤怒、厌恶、高兴和中性),同时记录ERP反应。与低特质社交焦虑组相比,高特质社交焦虑组对所有面部表情表现出更强的自动注意或过度警觉,以更大的N1波幅为指标。与低特质社交焦虑组相比,她们对所有面部表情也表现出更强的持续注意和精细加工,以显著增加的P2和P3波幅为指标。这些结果支持社交焦虑的认知模型,但与警觉-回避模型的预测不一致。