van der Meulen Miriam P, Lansdorp-Vogelaar Iris, van Heijningen Else-Mariëtte B, Kuipers Ernst J, van Ballegooijen Marjolein
Department of Public Health, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Cancer. 2016 Jun 1;122(11):1680-8. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29952. Epub 2016 Apr 8.
If some adenomas do not bleed over several years, they will cause systematic false-negative fecal immunochemical test (FIT) results. The long-term effectiveness of FIT screening has been estimated without accounting for such systematic false-negativity. There are now data with which to evaluate this issue.
The authors developed one microsimulation model (MISCAN [MIcrosimulation SCreening ANalysis]-Colon) without systematic false-negative FIT results and one model that allowed a percentage of adenomas to be systematically missed in successive FIT screening rounds. Both variants were adjusted to reproduce the first-round findings of the Dutch CORERO FIT screening trial. The authors then compared simulated detection rates in the second screening round with those observed, and adjusted the simulated percentage of systematically missed adenomas to those data. Finally, the authors calculated the impact of systematic false-negative FIT results on the effectiveness of repeated FIT screening.
The model without systematic false-negativity simulated higher detection rates in the second screening round than observed. These observed rates could be reproduced when assuming that FIT systematically missed 26% of advanced and 73% of nonadvanced adenomas. To reduce the false-positive rate in the second round to the observed level, the authors also had to assume that 30% of false-positive findings were systematically false-positive. Systematic false-negative FIT testing limits the long-term reduction of biennial FIT screening in the incidence of colorectal cancer (35.6% vs 40.9%) and its mortality (55.2% vs 59.0%) in participants.
The results of the current study provide convincing evidence based on the combination of real-life and modeling data that a percentage of adenomas are systematically missed by repeat FIT screening. This impairs the efficacy of FIT screening. Cancer 2016;122:1680-8. © 2016 American Cancer Society.
如果某些腺瘤在数年中都不出血,它们会导致粪便免疫化学检测(FIT)出现系统性假阴性结果。在未考虑这种系统性假阴性的情况下,已对FIT筛查的长期有效性进行了评估。现在有数据可用于评估此问题。
作者开发了一个无系统性FIT假阴性结果的微观模拟模型(MISCAN[微观模拟筛查分析]-结肠)和一个允许在连续的FIT筛查轮次中系统性漏检一定比例腺瘤的模型。两种变体均进行了调整,以重现荷兰CORERO FIT筛查试验的首轮结果。然后,作者将第二轮筛查中的模拟检出率与观察到的检出率进行比较,并根据这些数据调整系统性漏检腺瘤的模拟比例。最后,作者计算了系统性FIT假阴性结果对重复FIT筛查有效性的影响。
无系统性假阴性的模型在第二轮筛查中模拟的检出率高于观察到的检出率。当假设FIT系统性漏检26%的进展期腺瘤和73%的非进展期腺瘤时,可以重现这些观察到的检出率。为了将第二轮中的假阳性率降低到观察到的水平,作者还必须假设30%的假阳性结果是系统性假阳性。系统性FIT假阴性检测限制了两年一次的FIT筛查对参与者结直肠癌发病率(35.6%对40.9%)及其死亡率(55.2%对59.0%)的长期降低效果。
当前研究的结果基于现实生活和建模数据的结合提供了令人信服的证据,即重复FIT筛查会系统性漏检一定比例的腺瘤。这损害了FIT筛查的效果。《癌症》2016年;122:1680 - 8。©2016美国癌症协会。