• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

乳腺钼靶检查中的癌症检测与图像质量测量之间的关系。

The relationship between cancer detection in mammography and image quality measurements.

作者信息

Mackenzie Alistair, Warren Lucy M, Wallis Matthew G, Given-Wilson Rosalind M, Cooke Julie, Dance David R, Chakraborty Dev P, Halling-Brown Mark D, Looney Padraig T, Young Kenneth C

机构信息

National Coordinating Centre for the Physics in Mammography (NCCPM), Level B, St Luke's Wing, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford GU2 7XX, UK.

Cambridge Breast Unit, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge & NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, UK.

出版信息

Phys Med. 2016 Apr;32(4):568-74. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2016.03.004. Epub 2016 Apr 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.ejmp.2016.03.004
PMID:27061872
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4856544/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To investigate the relationship between image quality measurements and the clinical performance of digital mammographic systems.

METHODS

Mammograms containing subtle malignant non-calcification lesions and simulated malignant calcification clusters were adapted to appear as if acquired by four types of detector. Observers searched for suspicious lesions and gave these a malignancy score. Analysis was undertaken using jackknife alternative free-response receiver operating characteristics weighted figure of merit (FoM). Images of a CDMAM contrast-detail phantom were adapted to appear as if acquired using the same four detectors as the clinical images. The resultant threshold gold thicknesses were compared to the FoMs using a linear regression model and an F-test was used to find if the gradient of the relationship was significantly non-zero.

RESULTS

The detectors with the best image quality measurement also had the highest FoM values. The gradient of the inverse relationship between FoMs and threshold gold thickness for the 0.25mm diameter disk was significantly different from zero for calcification clusters (p=0.027), but not for non-calcification lesions (p=0.11). Systems performing just above the minimum image quality level set in the European Guidelines for Quality Assurance in Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis resulted in reduced cancer detection rates compared to systems performing at the achievable level.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical effectiveness of mammography for the task of detecting calcification clusters was found to be linked to image quality assessment using the CDMAM phantom. The European Guidelines should be reviewed as the current minimum image quality standards may be too low.

摘要

目的

研究数字乳腺摄影系统的图像质量测量与临床性能之间的关系。

方法

将包含细微恶性非钙化病变和模拟恶性钙化簇的乳腺X线照片进行调整,使其看起来像是由四种类型的探测器采集的。观察者搜索可疑病变并给出恶性程度评分。使用留一法替代自由响应接收器操作特征加权品质因数(FoM)进行分析。将CDMAM对比细节体模的图像进行调整,使其看起来像是使用与临床图像相同的四种探测器采集的。使用线性回归模型将所得的阈值金厚度与FoM进行比较,并使用F检验来确定这种关系的梯度是否显著不为零。

结果

图像质量测量最佳的探测器也具有最高的FoM值。对于钙化簇,直径0.25mm圆盘的FoM与阈值金厚度之间的反比关系梯度显著不同于零(p = 0.027),但对于非钙化病变则不然(p = 0.11)。与达到可实现水平性能的系统相比,仅略高于《欧洲乳腺癌筛查与诊断质量保证指南》中设定的最低图像质量水平的系统导致癌症检测率降低。

结论

发现乳腺摄影在检测钙化簇任务中的临床有效性与使用CDMAM体模进行的图像质量评估有关。由于当前的最低图像质量标准可能过低,因此应重新审视《欧洲指南》。

相似文献

1
The relationship between cancer detection in mammography and image quality measurements.乳腺钼靶检查中的癌症检测与图像质量测量之间的关系。
Phys Med. 2016 Apr;32(4):568-74. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2016.03.004. Epub 2016 Apr 6.
2
Breast cancer detection rates using four different types of mammography detectors.使用四种不同类型的乳腺摄影探测器的乳腺癌检测率。
Eur Radiol. 2016 Mar;26(3):874-83. doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-3885-y. Epub 2015 Jun 25.
3
Effect of image quality on calcification detection in digital mammography.数字乳腺摄影中图像质量对钙化检测的影响。
Med Phys. 2012 Jun;39(6):3202-13. doi: 10.1118/1.4718571.
4
The effect of image processing on the detection of cancers in digital mammography.图像处理对数字乳腺摄影中癌症检测的影响。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014 Aug;203(2):387-93. doi: 10.2214/AJR.13.11812.
5
Contrast-detail phantom scoring methodology.对比细节体模评分方法。
Med Phys. 2005 Mar;32(3):807-14. doi: 10.1118/1.1862097.
6
Impact of compressed breast thickness and dose on lesion detectability in digital mammography: FROC study with simulated lesions in real mammograms.乳腺压迫厚度和剂量对数字化乳腺摄影中病变可检测性的影响:在真实乳腺钼靶片中模拟病变的FROC研究
Med Phys. 2016 Sep;43(9):5104. doi: 10.1118/1.4960630.
7
Image processing can cause some malignant soft-tissue lesions to be missed in digital mammography images.图像处理可能导致在数字乳腺X线摄影图像中遗漏一些恶性软组织病变。
Clin Radiol. 2017 Sep;72(9):799.e1-799.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2017.03.024. Epub 2017 Apr 27.
8
Dose dependence of mass and microcalcification detection in digital mammography: free response human observer studies.数字化乳腺摄影中肿块及微钙化检测的剂量依赖性:自由反应式人体观察者研究
Med Phys. 2007 Feb;34(2):400-7. doi: 10.1118/1.2405324.
9
Image quality assessment in digital mammography: part II. NPWE as a validated alternative for contrast detail analysis.数字乳腺 X 线摄影中的图像质量评估:第二部分。NPWE 作为对比细节分析的经过验证的替代方法。
Phys Med Biol. 2011 Jul 21;56(14):4221-38. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/56/14/003. Epub 2011 Jun 23.
10
Toward image quality assessment in mammography using model observers: Detection of a calcification-like object.基于模型观察者的乳腺 X 线摄影图像质量评估:钙化样物体的检测。
Med Phys. 2017 Nov;44(11):5726-5739. doi: 10.1002/mp.12532. Epub 2017 Oct 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Predicting the quality of digital mammography from the perspective of detectability of microcalcifications: A Radiomics approach.从微钙化灶可检测性角度预测数字化乳腺摄影质量:一种放射组学方法。
Med Phys. 2025 Aug;52(8):e18061. doi: 10.1002/mp.18061.
2
Exploring the impact of image restoration in simulating higher dose mammography: effects on the detectability of microcalcifications across different sizes using model observer analysis.探索图像恢复在模拟高剂量乳腺摄影中的影响:使用模型观察者分析评估对不同大小微钙化灶可检测性的影响。
J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2025 Nov;12(Suppl 2):S22013. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.12.S2.S22013. Epub 2025 Jun 18.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Breast cancer detection rates using four different types of mammography detectors.使用四种不同类型的乳腺摄影探测器的乳腺癌检测率。
Eur Radiol. 2016 Mar;26(3):874-83. doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-3885-y. Epub 2015 Jun 25.
2
Image simulation and a model of noise power spectra across a range of mammographic beam qualities.图像模拟以及一系列乳腺X射线摄影束流质量下的噪声功率谱模型。
Med Phys. 2014 Dec;41(12):121901. doi: 10.1118/1.4900819.
3
The effect of image processing on the detection of cancers in digital mammography.图像处理对数字乳腺摄影中癌症检测的影响。
Quality assurance in Mammography: An overview.
乳腺 X 线摄影中的质量保证:概述。
Eur J Radiol. 2023 Aug;165:110935. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.110935. Epub 2023 Jun 19.
4
Automated Assessment of Breast Positioning Quality in Screening Mammography.乳腺钼靶筛查中乳房定位质量的自动评估
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Sep 27;14(19):4704. doi: 10.3390/cancers14194704.
5
Image Quality Comparison between Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Images and 2D Mammographic Images Using the CDMAM Test Object.使用CDMAM测试物体比较数字乳腺断层合成图像与二维乳腺钼靶图像的图像质量
J Imaging. 2022 Aug 21;8(8):223. doi: 10.3390/jimaging8080223.
6
Validation of a mammographic image quality modification algorithm using 3D-printed breast phantoms.使用3D打印乳房模型对乳腺X线图像质量修正算法进行验证
J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2021 May;8(3):033502. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.8.3.033502. Epub 2021 May 20.
7
On the relevance of modulation transfer function measurements in digital mammography quality control.调制传递函数测量在数字乳腺摄影质量控制中的相关性
J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2021 Mar;8(2):023505. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.8.2.023505. Epub 2021 Apr 27.
8
An investigation into the validity of utilising the CDRAD 2.0 phantom for optimisation studies in digital radiography.关于在数字放射摄影中使用CDRAD 2.0体模进行优化研究的有效性调查。
Br J Radiol. 2018 Sep;91(1089):20180317. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20180317. Epub 2018 Jul 5.
9
Quality assurance target for community-based breast cancer screening in China: a model simulation.基于社区的中国乳腺癌筛查质量保证目标:模型模拟。
BMC Cancer. 2018 Mar 7;18(1):261. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4168-1.
10
A review of mammographic positioning image quality criteria for the craniocaudal projection.乳腺头尾位投照的乳房X线摄影定位图像质量标准综述。
Br J Radiol. 2018 Feb;91(1082):20170611. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20170611. Epub 2017 Dec 5.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014 Aug;203(2):387-93. doi: 10.2214/AJR.13.11812.
4
Comparison of direct digital mammography, computed radiography, and film-screen in the French national breast cancer screening program.法国国家乳腺癌筛查计划中直接数字化乳腺 X 线摄影、计算机放射成像和屏片的比较。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014 Jan;202(1):229-36. doi: 10.2214/AJR.12.10419.
5
Technical and clinical breast cancer screening performance indicators for computed radiography versus direct digital radiography.计算机放射摄影与直接数字放射摄影的技术和临床乳腺癌筛查性能指标。
Eur Radiol. 2013 Oct;23(10):2891-8. doi: 10.1007/s00330-013-2876-0. Epub 2013 May 21.
6
Digital compared with screen-film mammography: performance measures in concurrent cohorts within an organized breast screening program.数字与屏片式乳腺摄影比较:在有组织的乳腺筛查计划中的同期队列中的性能测量。
Radiology. 2013 Sep;268(3):684-93. doi: 10.1148/radiol.13122567. Epub 2013 May 14.
7
Effect of image quality on calcification detection in digital mammography.数字乳腺摄影中图像质量对钙化检测的影响。
Med Phys. 2012 Jun;39(6):3202-13. doi: 10.1118/1.4718571.
8
Conversion of mammographic images to appear with the noise and sharpness characteristics of a different detector and x-ray system.将乳腺 X 光图像转换为具有不同探测器和 X 射线系统的噪声和锐度特征。
Med Phys. 2012 May;39(5):2721-34. doi: 10.1118/1.4704525.
9
Pathological and mammographic prognostic factors for screen detected cancers in a multi-centre randomised, controlled trial of mammographic screening in women from age 40 to 48 years.在一项 40 至 48 岁女性乳腺 X 线筛查的多中心随机对照试验中,对筛查出的癌症进行病理和乳腺 X 线摄影预测因素分析。
Breast. 2011 Dec;20(6):525-8. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2011.05.008. Epub 2011 Jun 21.
10
Evaluation of clinical image processing algorithms used in digital mammography.数字乳腺摄影中临床图像处理算法的评估
Med Phys. 2009 Mar;36(3):765-75. doi: 10.1118/1.3077121.