An investigation into the validity of utilising the CDRAD 2.0 phantom for optimisation studies in digital radiography.

OBJECTIVES

To determine if a relationship exists between low contrast detail (LCD) detectability using the CDRAD 2.0 phantom, visual measures of image quality (IQ) and simulated lesion visibility (LV) when performing digital chest radiography (CXR).

METHODS

Using a range of acquisition parameters, a CDRAD 2.0 phantom was used to acquire a set of images with different levels of image quality. LCD detectability using the CDRAD 2.0 phantom, represented by an image quality figure inverse (IQF) metric, was determined using the phantom analyser software. A Lungman chest phantom was loaded with two simulated lesions, of different sizes/placed in different locations, and was imaged using the same acquisition factors as the CDRAD 2.0 phantom. A relative visual grading analysis (VGA) was used by seven observers for IQ and LV evaluation of the Lungman images. Correlations between IQF, IQ and LV were investigated.

RESULTS

Pearson's correlation demonstrated a strong positive correlation (r = 0.91; p < 0.001) between the IQ and the IQF. Spearman's correlation showed a good positive correlation (r = 0.79; p < 0.001) and (r = 0.68; p < 0.001) between the IQF and the LV for the first lesion (left upper lobe) and the second lesion (right middle lobe), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

From results presented in this study, the automated evaluation of LCD detectability using CDRAD 2.0 phantom is likely to be a suitable option for IQ and LV evaluation in digital CXR optimisation studies. Advances in knowledge: This research establishes the potential of the CDRAD 2.0 phantom in digital CXR optimisation studies.