Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Tianjin Medical University, 22 Qixiangtai Road, Heping District, Tianjin, 300070, People's Republic of China.
Tianjin Binhai New Area Tanggu Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Tianjin, 300451, China.
BMC Cancer. 2018 Mar 7;18(1):261. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4168-1.
We aimed to clarify the feasibility of a community-based screening strategy for breast cancer in Tianjin, China; to identify the factors that most significantly influenced its feasibility; and to identify the reference range for quality control.
A state-transition Markov model simulated a hypothetical cohort of 100,000 healthy women, the start aged was set at 35 years and the time horizon was set to 50 years. The primary outcome for the model was the incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR), defined as the program's cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. Three screening strategies providing by community health service for women aged 35 to 69 years was compared regarding to different intervals.
The probability of the ICUR being below 20 272USD (i.e., triple the annual gross domestic product [3 GDPs]) per QALY saved was 100% for annual screening strategy and screening every three years. Only when the attendance rate was > 50%, the probability for annual screening would be cost effective > 95%. The probability for the annual screening strategy being cost effective could reach to 95% for a willingness-to-pay (WTP) of 2 GDPs when the compliance rate for transfer was > 80%. When 10% stage I tumors were detected by screening, the probability of the annual screening strategy being cost effective would be up to 95% for a WTP > 3 GDPs.
Annual community-based breast cancer screening was cost effective for a WTP of 3 GDP based on the incidence of breast cancer in Tianjin, China. Measures are needed to ensure performance indicators to a desirable level for the cost-effectiveness of breast cancer screening.
本研究旨在明确中国天津市基于社区的乳腺癌筛查策略的可行性;确定影响其可行性的最重要因素;并确定质量控制的参考范围。
采用状态转移马尔可夫模型模拟了一个由 10 万名健康女性组成的假设队列,起始年龄为 35 岁,时间范围为 50 年。模型的主要结果是增量成本效益比(ICUR),定义为该项目每获得一个质量调整生命年(QALY)的成本。对 35 至 69 岁女性的三种社区卫生服务提供的筛查策略,根据不同的间隔进行了比较。
在节省每 QALY 成本 20272 美元(即三倍年国内生产总值[3GDP])的情况下,年度筛查策略和每三年筛查一次的 ICUR 低于该值的概率为 100%。只有当出勤率>50%时,年度筛查才具有成本效益>95%。当转移符合率>80%时,年度筛查策略的成本效益比为 2GDP 时,其具有成本效益的概率可达到 95%。当通过筛查检测到 10%的 I 期肿瘤时,年度筛查策略的成本效益比为 3GDP 时,其具有成本效益的概率可达到 95%。
基于天津市乳腺癌的发病率,年度基于社区的乳腺癌筛查对于支付意愿(WTP)为 3GDP 是具有成本效益的。需要采取措施确保绩效指标达到理想水平,以实现乳腺癌筛查的成本效益。