Suppr超能文献

心率监测在能量消耗估算中的应用:一项使用间接全身量热法的验证研究。

The use of heart rate monitoring in the estimation of energy expenditure: a validation study using indirect whole-body calorimetry.

作者信息

Ceesay S M, Prentice A M, Day K C, Murgatroyd P R, Goldberg G R, Scott W, Spurr G B

机构信息

University of Cambridge, MRC Dunn Nutrition Unit.

出版信息

Br J Nutr. 1989 Mar;61(2):175-86. doi: 10.1079/bjn19890107.

Abstract
  1. A modified heart rate (HR) method for predicting total energy expenditure (TEE) was cross-validated against whole-body calorimetry (CAL). Minute-by-minute HR was converted to energy expenditure (EE) using individual calibration curves when HR exceeded a pre-determined 'FLEX' value designed to discriminate periods of activity. ('FLEX' HR was defined as the mean of the highest HR during rest and the lowest HR during the lightest imposed exercise.) Sedentary EE (below FLEX) was calculated as the mean EE during lying down, sitting and standing at rest. Sleeping EE was calculated as basal metabolic rate (BMR) predicted from standard equations. 2. Calibration curves of oxygen consumption v. HR for different postures at rest and during exercise were obtained for twenty healthy subjects (eleven male, nine female); mean r 0.941 (SD 0.04). The mean FLEX HR for men and women were 86 (SD 10) and 96 (SD 6) beats/min respectively. 3. Simultaneous measurements of HR and EE were made during 21 h continuous CAL, which included 4 x 30 min imposed exercise (cycling, rowing, stepping, jogging). HR exceeded FLEX for a mean of 98 (SD 41) min. Mean TEE by CAL (TEE.CAL) was 8063 (SD 1445) kJ. 4. The HR method yielded a mean non-significant underestimate in TEE (TEE.HR) of 1.2 (SD 6.2)% (range -11.4 to +10.6%). Regression of TEE.HR (Y) v. TEE.CAL (X) yielded Y = 0.868 X + 927 kJ, r 0.943, SE of the estimate 458 kJ, n 20. 5. The satisfactory predictive power and low cost of the method makes it suitable for many field and epidemiological applications.
摘要
  1. 一种用于预测总能量消耗(TEE)的改良心率(HR)方法与全身量热法(CAL)进行了交叉验证。当心率超过预先确定的用于区分活动时段的“FLEX”值时,每分钟的心率通过个体校准曲线转换为能量消耗(EE)。(“FLEX”心率定义为休息时最高心率与最轻强度的强制运动时最低心率的平均值。)久坐时的能量消耗(低于FLEX)计算为躺下、坐着和静站时的平均能量消耗。睡眠时的能量消耗计算为根据标准方程预测的基础代谢率(BMR)。2. 为20名健康受试者(11名男性,9名女性)获取了休息和运动时不同姿势下耗氧量与心率的校准曲线;平均r为0.941(标准差0.04)。男性和女性的平均FLEX心率分别为86(标准差10)次/分钟和96(标准差6)次/分钟。3. 在21小时的连续量热法测量期间同步测量了心率和能量消耗,其中包括4次30分钟的强制运动(骑自行车、划船、踏步、慢跑)。心率超过FLEX的平均时长为98(标准差41)分钟。量热法测得的平均总能量消耗(TEE.CAL)为8063(标准差1445)千焦。4. 心率法得出的总能量消耗(TEE.HR)平均低估了1.2(标准差6.2)%(范围为-11.4%至+10.6%),差异无统计学意义。TEE.HR(Y)对TEE.CAL(X)的回归得出Y = 0.868X + 927千焦,r为0.943,估计标准误为458千焦,n为20。5. 该方法具有令人满意的预测能力且成本低廉,适用于许多现场和流行病学应用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验