Slack R, Boorman L, Patel P, Harris S, Bruyns-Haylett M, Kennerley A, Jones M, Berwick J
Department of Psychology, University of Sheffield, Western Bank, Sheffield S10 2TN, United Kingdom.
Department of Systems Engineering, University of Reading, Whiteknights, Reading RG6 6AY, United Kingdom.
J Neurosci Methods. 2016 Jul 15;267:21-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2016.04.005. Epub 2016 Apr 7.
Many brain imaging techniques interpret the haemodynamic response as an indirect indicator of underlying neural activity. However, a challenge when interpreting this blood based signal is how changes in brain state may affect both baseline and stimulus evoked haemodynamics.
We developed an Automatic Brain State Classifier (ABSC), validated on data from anaesthetised rodents. It uses vectorised information obtained from the windowed spectral frequency power of the Local Field Potential. Current state is then classified by comparing this vectorised information against that calculated from state specific training datasets.
The ABSC identified two user defined brain states (synchronised and desynchronised), with high accuracy (∼90%). Baseline haemodynamics were found to be significantly different in the two identified states. During state defined periods of elevated baseline haemodynamics we found significant decreases in evoked haemodynamic responses to somatosensory stimuli.
State classification - The ABSC (∼90%) demonstrated greater accuracy than clustering (∼66%) or 'power threshold' (∼64%) methods of comparison. Haemodynamic averaging - Our novel approach of selectively averaging stimulus evoked haemodynamic trials by brain state yields higher quality data than creating a single average from all trials.
The ABSC can account for some of the commonly observed trial-to-trial variability in haemodynamic responses which arises from changes in cortical state. This variability might otherwise be incorrectly attributed to alternative interpretations. A greater understanding of the effects of cortical state on haemodynamic changes could be used to inform techniques such as general linear modelling (GLM), commonly used in fMRI.
许多脑成像技术将血液动力学反应解释为潜在神经活动的间接指标。然而,在解释这种基于血液的信号时,一个挑战是脑状态的变化如何影响基线和刺激诱发的血液动力学。
我们开发了一种自动脑状态分类器(ABSC),并在麻醉啮齿动物的数据上进行了验证。它使用从局部场电位的窗口频谱频率功率获得的矢量化信息。然后通过将这种矢量化信息与从特定状态训练数据集计算得到的信息进行比较来对当前状态进行分类。
ABSC识别出两种用户定义的脑状态(同步和去同步),准确率很高(约90%)。发现这两种识别出的状态下基线血液动力学有显著差异。在基线血液动力学升高的状态定义期间,我们发现对体感刺激的诱发血液动力学反应显著降低。
状态分类——ABSC(约90%)比聚类(约66%)或“功率阈值”(约64%)比较方法具有更高的准确率。血液动力学平均——我们通过脑状态选择性平均刺激诱发血液动力学试验的新方法产生的高质量数据比从所有试验创建单个平均值更高。
ABSC可以解释血液动力学反应中一些常见的逐次试验变异性,这些变异性是由皮质状态变化引起 的。否则,这种变异性可能会被错误地归因于其他解释。对皮质状态对血液动力学变化影响的更深入理解可用于为功能磁共振成像中常用的一般线性模型(GLM)等技术提供信息。