• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

功能丰富,但用户友好:言语病理学家对基于计算机的失语症治疗的偏好。

Feature rich, but user-friendly: Speech pathologists' preferences for computer-based aphasia therapy.

作者信息

Swales Megan A, Hill Anne J, Finch Emma

机构信息

a Division of Speech Pathology , School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences .

b Centre of Research Excellence in Telehealth and Telerehabilitation Research Unit, The University of Queensland , St Lucia , QLD , Australia .

出版信息

Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2016 Aug;18(4):315-28. doi: 10.3109/17549507.2015.1081283. Epub 2015 Sep 15.

DOI:10.3109/17549507.2015.1081283
PMID:27063672
Abstract

PURPOSE

High-intensity language therapy has been shown to provide greater outcomes for people with aphasia (PWA). Unfortunately, a number of issues including the ageing population and a lack of rurally-based clinicians prevent high-intensity interventions. Computer-based therapies are a potential solution to the issues of intensity and accessibility; however, this service delivery model is not commonly used. A possible reason behind the poor uptake is that current computer-based aphasia therapy (CBAT) programs may not meet the needs of speech-language pathologists (SLPs). This study investigated the preferences of SLPs with regard to the features desired in their ideal CBAT program.

METHOD

Phenomenological research methodology was used to explore the preferences of 10 SLPs. Data were analysed using qualitative thematic analysis.

RESULT

Desired features were grouped into five themes: therapy activities, stimuli, cues, access and progress data. A range of sub-themes were also identified.

CONCLUSION

The wide range of desirable features found in this study may reflect the extent to which current CBAT programs are considered to be useful, but perhaps do not meet the needs of users. The study's findings provide useful information for future CBAT developers to create programs with high clinician usability.

摘要

目的

高强度语言治疗已被证明能为失语症患者带来更好的治疗效果。不幸的是,包括人口老龄化和缺乏乡村临床医生在内的诸多问题阻碍了高强度干预措施的实施。基于计算机的治疗是解决强度和可及性问题的一种潜在方案;然而,这种服务提供模式并不常用。采用率低背后的一个可能原因是,当前基于计算机的失语症治疗(CBAT)程序可能无法满足言语语言病理学家(SLP)的需求。本研究调查了言语语言病理学家对其理想的CBAT程序所需功能的偏好。

方法

采用现象学研究方法来探究10位言语语言病理学家的偏好。使用定性主题分析法对数据进行分析。

结果

所需功能被归纳为五个主题:治疗活动、刺激、提示、访问和进展数据。还确定了一系列子主题。

结论

本研究中发现的广泛的理想功能可能反映了当前CBAT程序被认为有用的程度,但可能未满足用户需求。该研究结果为未来CBAT开发者创建具有高临床医生可用性的程序提供了有用信息。

相似文献

1
Feature rich, but user-friendly: Speech pathologists' preferences for computer-based aphasia therapy.功能丰富,但用户友好:言语病理学家对基于计算机的失语症治疗的偏好。
Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2016 Aug;18(4):315-28. doi: 10.3109/17549507.2015.1081283. Epub 2015 Sep 15.
2
Exploring speech-language pathologists' perspectives about living successfully with aphasia.探索言语语言病理学家对失语症患者成功生活的看法。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2011 May-Jun;46(3):300-11. doi: 10.3109/13682822.2010.496762.
3
Prognostication in post-stroke aphasia: How do speech pathologists formulate and deliver information about recovery?卒中后失语症的预后:言语病理学家如何制定和传达关于恢复的信息?
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2020 Jul;55(4):520-536. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12534. Epub 2020 Apr 29.
4
Barriers and facilitators to meeting aphasia guideline recommendations: what factors influence speech pathologists' practice?满足失语症指南建议的障碍和促进因素:哪些因素影响言语病理学家的实践?
Disabil Rehabil. 2019 Jun;41(13):1596-1607. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2018.1432706. Epub 2018 Jan 29.
5
What do speech-language pathologists describe as most important when trying to achieve client participation during aphasia rehabilitation? A qualitative focus group interview study.言语语言病理学家在试图让失语症患者在康复过程中积极参与时,认为什么是最重要的?一项定性焦点小组访谈研究。
Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2019 Oct;21(5):493-503. doi: 10.1080/17549507.2017.1413134. Epub 2017 Dec 18.
6
Current Australian speech-language pathology practice in addressing psychological well-being in people with aphasia after stroke.澳大利亚目前针对中风后失语症患者心理健康问题的言语病理学实践。
Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2015 Jun;17(3):252-62. doi: 10.3109/17549507.2015.1024170. Epub 2015 May 4.
7
"There are endless areas that they can use it for": speech-language pathologist perspectives of technology support for aphasia self-management.“他们可以在无数领域使用它”:言语语言病理学家对失语症自我管理的技术支持的观点。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2023 Nov;18(8):1473-1488. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2022.2037758. Epub 2022 Feb 15.
8
"Well it has to be language-related": speech-language pathologists' goals for people with aphasia and their families.“嗯,这肯定与语言相关”:言语语言病理学家对失语症患者及其家属的目标。
Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2011 Aug;13(4):317-28. doi: 10.3109/17549507.2011.584632.
9
Language Sample Analysis in Clinical Practice: Speech-Language Pathologists' Barriers, Facilitators, and Needs.临床实践中的语言样本分析:言语语言病理学家的障碍、促进因素和需求。
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2022 Jan 5;53(1):1-16. doi: 10.1044/2021_LSHSS-21-00026. Epub 2021 Oct 25.
10
Speech language pathologists' opinions of constraint-induced language therapy.言语语言病理学家对强制性诱导语言疗法的看法。
Top Stroke Rehabil. 2014 Jul-Aug;21(4):332-8. doi: 10.1310/tsr2104-332.

引用本文的文献

1
A Virtual, Randomized, Control Trial of a Digital Therapeutic for Speech, Language, and Cognitive Intervention in Post-stroke Persons With Aphasia.一项针对中风后失语症患者进行言语、语言和认知干预的数字疗法的虚拟随机对照试验。
Front Neurol. 2021 Feb 12;12:626780. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.626780. eCollection 2021.
2
[Review on the improvements in communication skills among aphasic patients through the use of portable technology.].[关于通过使用便携式技术提高失语症患者沟通能力的综述。]
Rev Esp Salud Publica. 2020 Jun 10;94:e202006044.
3
Refining an Asynchronous Telerehabilitation Platform for Speech-Language Pathology: Engaging End-Users in the Process.
完善用于言语病理学的异步远程康复平台:让终端用户参与其中。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 Dec 20;10:640. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00640. eCollection 2016.