Suppr超能文献

有用但不同:住院医师对跨专业反馈的看法

Useful but Different: Resident Physician Perceptions of Interprofessional Feedback.

作者信息

Vesel Travis P, O'Brien Bridget C, Henry Duncan M, van Schaik Sandrijn M

机构信息

a Department of Pediatrics , University of California San Francisco , San Francisco , California , USA.

b Department of Medicine , University of California San Francisco , San Francisco , California , USA.

出版信息

Teach Learn Med. 2016;28(2):125-34. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2016.1146609.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

Phenomenon: Based on recently formulated interprofessional core competencies, physicians are expected to incorporate feedback from other healthcare professionals. Based on social identity theory, physicians likely differentiate between feedback from members of their own profession and others. The current study examined residents' experiences with, and perceptions of, interprofessional feedback.

APPROACH

In 2013, Anesthesia, Obstetrics-Gynecology, Pediatrics, and Psychiatry residents completed a survey including questions about frequency of feedback from different professionals and its perceived value (5-point scale). The authors performed an analysis of variance to examine interactions between residency program and profession of feedback provider. They conducted follow-up interviews with a subset of residents to explore reasons for residents' survey ratings.

FINDINGS

Fifty-two percent (131/254) of residents completed the survey, and 15 participated in interviews. Eighty percent of residents reported receiving written feedback from physicians, 26% from nurses, and less than 10% from other professions. There was a significant interaction between residency program and feedback provider profession, F(21, 847) = 3.82, p < .001, and a significant main effect of feedback provider profession, F(7, 847) = 73.7, p < .001. On post hoc analyses, residents from all programs valued feedback from attending physicians higher than feedback from others, and anesthesia residents rated feedback from other professionals significantly lower than other residents. Ten major themes arose from qualitative data analysis, which revealed an overall positive attitude toward interprofessional feedback and clarified reasons behind residents' perceptions and identified barriers. Insights: Residents in our study reported limited exposure to interprofessional feedback and valued such feedback less than intraprofessional feedback. However, our data suggest opportunities exist for effective utilization of interprofessional feedback.

摘要

未标注

现象:根据最近制定的跨专业核心能力要求,医生应纳入其他医疗保健专业人员的反馈。基于社会认同理论,医生可能会区分来自本专业成员和其他专业成员的反馈。本研究调查了住院医师对跨专业反馈的经历和看法。

方法

2013年,麻醉科、妇产科、儿科和精神科的住院医师完成了一项调查,其中包括关于来自不同专业人员的反馈频率及其感知价值的问题(5分制)。作者进行了方差分析,以检验住院医师培训项目与反馈提供者专业之间的相互作用。他们对一部分住院医师进行了后续访谈,以探讨住院医师调查评分的原因。

结果

52%(131/254)的住院医师完成了调查,15人参与了访谈。80%的住院医师报告收到医生的书面反馈,26%收到护士的反馈,不到10%收到其他专业人员的反馈。住院医师培训项目与反馈提供者专业之间存在显著的相互作用,F(21, 847) = 3.82,p <.001,反馈提供者专业存在显著的主效应,F(7, 847) = 73.7,p <.001。在事后分析中,所有项目的住院医师都认为主治医生的反馈比其他人的反馈更有价值,麻醉科住院医师对其他专业人员反馈的评分明显低于其他住院医师。定性数据分析产生了10个主要主题,揭示了对跨专业反馈的总体积极态度,并阐明了住院医师看法背后的原因并确定了障碍。见解:我们研究中的住院医师报告称,他们接触跨专业反馈的机会有限,并且认为这种反馈不如专业内反馈有价值。然而,我们的数据表明,有效利用跨专业反馈存在机会。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验