Addington D, Holley H L
Department of Psychiatry, University of Calgary, Alberta.
Can J Psychiatry. 1989 Mar;34(2):89-93. doi: 10.1177/070674378903400203.
In this study two groups of schizophrenic patients are compared on a number of clinical and demographic variables. The first group consists of 52 consecutive admissions to a forensic assessment unit of patients with a diagnosis of schizophrenia. The second is a consecutive series of schizophrenic patients admitted to two open admission units. Significant differences were found between the two groups. Specifically the forensic patients were more often male, single and antisocial as assessed by previous convictions and more often transient or living semi-independently in sheltered accommodation. They were less compliant with treatment. The two groups did not differ with respect to clinical features such as duration of illness and number of hospitalizations. It is concluded that individual patient characteristics may contribute to an outcome of legal involvement among schizophrenics. The implications of this for service delivery and future research on criminalization are discussed.
在本研究中,对两组精神分裂症患者的一系列临床和人口统计学变量进行了比较。第一组由52名连续入住法医评估单元且被诊断为精神分裂症的患者组成。第二组是连续入住两个开放式收治单元的精神分裂症患者系列。两组之间发现了显著差异。具体而言,经先前定罪评估,法医鉴定患者中男性、单身和反社会的情况更为常见,并且更多是临时的或半独立居住在庇护所。他们对治疗的依从性较差。两组在疾病持续时间和住院次数等临床特征方面没有差异。得出的结论是,个体患者特征可能导致精神分裂症患者出现法律介入的结果。讨论了这对服务提供和未来刑事定罪研究的影响。